Frage von Endymion:
Hello dear community,
I am looking for my next U.S. vacation an HD camcorder the consumer class. I am absolute beginners, it will be my first camera ever!
So far I've only been on holiday photos (and thought the only synonymous with cheap cameras in automatic mode [casio exilim series]) and moved me this time to record some memories.
Thus, only 0815 are filmed weeks for tourist behavior. What is the average Touri halt so everything takes for the local archives.
All the stuff I would then piecing after the holiday in a beautiful film, with inferior music and text and then play the hunchbacked relatives in demand (I find any better than the 2000 photos taken all see on TV).
I read on now for a few weeks, eager dangerous half-knowledge from the Internet. However, I could not decide, for any camcorder.
Some things are still unclear to me synonymous.
The following criteria are important to me now for the Purchase of Camera:
[List]
+ Hot Videos synonymous with the daylight on a 52 "is still a good figure.
+ Good optical stabilizer offer a
+ The camera should be used in automatic mode.
+ Save to SDHC, this evening I will always be a netbook or external hard drive transfer.
+ There is no external micro are used, the recordings will nevertheless be useful (synonymous with light wind)
+ The cheaper the better, really is the SD66 is already above the planned budget of 300 ¬
+ LowLight, Wide & Zoom criteria are for me [/ list no: u: 68f4c88bab]
Since I use the internet only video on Youtube as a reference, but yes, at least not too much optical-looking statements, the moment I vacillate between 3 cameras. I hope there are some people who do so could expose their experience.
Panasonic SD66 + Cheap
+ Touchscreen
- It is all of a dither effect written
- In many videos Picture is very restless (I have no idea whether or s.der conversion is the Schomberg in RAW format looks like this)
- AVCHD codec 17 Mbit limited to (a disadvantage?)
Canon HF200 + Good reviews
+ Picture quality looks great very much (despite YouTube)
+ Stabilizer seems to work great with
+ 24 Mbps AVCHD codec (an advantage?)
- No touchscreen (focussing a problem?)
- Microphone seems susceptible to wind
Canon HF M306 + Super Picture, very quiet
+ Touchscreen (Touch Focus)
+ 24Mbit
- Expensive
- No info about Microphone quality found (only a couple of Japanese videos of the M31
From her price is of course the SD66 my first choice. However, I can tell the difference with Canon poorly. I'd like to sometimes not be able to compare videos on YouTube: (
Even me these horror stories about making this trembling fear.
When asked 17Mbit vs. 24Mbit I am at a loss. In my youthful folly, I assume that more synonymous must be better. Is that true? The advantage of 17Mbit would certainly require less memory. However, I would be quite prepared for the significant increase in quality ¬ 100 to invest more and to Cano
Antwort von Büschel:
So I faced a similar decision as you, the HF200 and the SD66 I've used both myself tested. My experience:
The HF200 is great in Mist Comparison. What bothered me:
- Extremely over-sharpened, soft hail it synonymous terribly during daylight
- Klackernder optical stabilizer is switched off
- Lowlight disastrous (ok, is not so important for you)
The SD66 is the better choice. Why?
- Much more efficient stabilizer
- A bit more wide angle (synonymous if you do not feel about as important, I think, in practice, it looks a little different ...)
- A better display that flickers noticeably and the HF200 does not look so good
- The feel better than I SD66 processed, both are indeed not "cars", but the HF200 is particularly the controls sometimes very shaky
The 24MB actually bring any visible benefits to a 16GB card, so about 90 minutes, with 17MB fit about 120 minutes.
The image quality of the SD66 is better, despite a greater zoom range.
On my FullHD Television, the HF200 pretty rustling (all these ugly sharpening artifacts), the SD66, however, looks quite good.
A UV filter is nonsense and does nothing (Attention, the smell again after policy debate). The lack of filter threads of the SD66 can I find a little pity, but if you want to rotate anyway just "plain vanilla Touri-Videos", you will need no filter.
Some kind of a tremor, I have not been in the SD66 can find.
The SD66 is not a high flyer, but in the price range I think the first choice - especially since your budget eh was a bit exceeded.
What should be synonymous mentioned yet: The HF200 has a true 25p mode, but is fürn Bobber, because no true progressive recording, but only for interlaced images calculated dung.
The Panasonic has no remote control, the Canons have. In my experience, these remotes are usually pointless but anyway, since they have little in the open range. I had almost reinquetschen in the camcorder until it responded times. The receivers are usually placed unfavorable and sunlight does the rest, in order to worsen the reception.
With test clips, I can not serve you first, I plan the day, however, some trips with the SD66, of which some will land safely on Youtube.
Memory: The Canon was a Class 4 card, these I have tested with 24MB and it worked without problems. In the Panasonic then that is certainly not an issue. I have been using an SD9, which also dominates maximum 17MBit there an older Class 4 8GB card came with and a relatively current 16Gb Class 6 card is used without any problems.
Wind: This is for internal mics before such a thing, usually can bend the Windcut options. With both cameras, the Micro is sitting in front, I would be in doubt, apply adhesive skins, they should do their duty.
Hope you have helped so on. For further questions: Go ahead.
