I have the following question: I have 16:9 material recorded and edited with Premiere Pro, in a 16:9 project in which the auto correct pixel aspect ratio is selected and the Picture squashed accordingly been synonymous with the export.
But now I have the following problem: individual scenes because I had something upscaling, because things disappear s.Bildrand should jump the bars now (partly because reingezoomt was) With a 4:3 project, I would now a mask in Photoshop tinkering, the extra cache on the Picture sets so that the beams remain uniform.
How do I do it but when 16:9 material in Premiere Pro? Because the mask would then yes again "mitgestaucht" are ... I had to hire over with, the finished cut into After Effects to import and then export as 4:3, then in Premiere normally an extra mask drüber define them. But it should be easier to go but synonymous.
I hope you can help me!
Antwort von robbie:
hääää? Now I have 4x read your post must ... And I understand it is still not a lot.
I guess times you have your material is not 16:9 but in 4:3 letterbox, so that you are above and below have a black bar. But that is not 16:9, but 4:3 with two bars. In true 16:9 did you not these bars.
When exporting I get now is not what you mean by that that your masks beam would then be moved ..???
Antwort von Wiro:
"robbie" wrote:
I guess times you have your material is not 16:9 but in 4:3 letterbox recorded
That I suspect synonymous. Greeting Wiro
Antwort von Tobi23:
Sorry if it was difficult to understand.
No, I do not have a letterbox material, but 16:9, I believe they call it anamorphic, 4:3 in the "stretched" look and then editing program correctly interpreted. The material is therefore in the editing program auto squashed, and so are the bars.
And if I now that in several individual scenes reinzoomen the needs and then export the finished cut, "jump" beams in the exported movie.
Antwort von Markus:
"Tobi23" wrote:
With a 4:3 project, I would now a mask in Photoshop tinkering, the extra cache on the Picture sets so that the beams remain uniform.
Similarly, the synonymous with 16:9 material. If that is what I think, do you mean then that the first (and perhaps synonymous the last) line image flickers. These lines can you with the Photoshop mask and cover up is good. As long as you the PSD file lay no zoom, the mask during the video unchanged.
Antwort von Tobi23:
The flicker, I know synonymous, but it is not in this case.
In the exported movie to see scenes in the reingezoomt was just so out as if in a picture with letterbox reingezoomt was, so the bar is narrower than usual.
The material, however, is anamorphic.
Antwort von robbie:
Screenshots?
Antwort von Tobi23:
The scenes in the reingezoomt was simply the narrow beam. As if to complete the picture, including bars would have been zoomed.
Antwort von Markus:
"Tobi23" wrote:
The scenes in the reingezoomt was simply the narrow beam.
The catch is that those with this information the anamorphic 16:9 odds. It would place a screenshot s.dieser helpful, so we really synonymous speak of the same thing.
Antwort von Wiro:
"Mark" wrote:
The catch is that those with this information to the contrary anamorphic 16:9
It does it in fact. The described representation occurs when a 16:9-PAR Project with 1,067 (4:3) are exported. Prevention can be zoomed by using the above scenes and below the percentage cuts to the zoom was.
Or, the exported video in a 4:3 project and then import the famous black bars above and below drüber basket ;-) Greeting Wiro
Antwort von robbie:
For anamorphic 16:9 allowed you to just have no bars.
Maybe you like us anyway provide a few screenshots?
Here are some examples of how material in Premiere should look when it is correctly recording, recordings, etc. .. we apologize to the poor resolution, for illustrative purposes reichts, and the bandwidth is geschohnt;)
Antwort von Tobi23:
"Wiro" wrote:
The described representation occurs when a 16:9-PAR Project with 1,067 (4:3) are exported. Prevention can be zoomed by using the above scenes and below the percentage cuts to the zoom was.
Or, the exported video in a 4:3 project and then import the famous black bars above and below drüber basket ;-) Greeting Wiro
Thank you for the tips! I look, tonight if I can create screenshots.
Antwort von Tobi23:
"robbie" wrote:
For anamorphic 16:9 allowed you to just have no bars.
Maybe you like us anyway provide a few screenshots?
Here are some examples of how material in Premiere should look when it is correctly recording, recordings, etc. .. we apologize to the poor resolution, for illustrative purposes reichts, and the bandwidth is geschohnt;)
thanks for the screenshots. Your material looks when cut in Premiere 169.jpg exactly like yours, so 16:9-windows, no bars, and stretched from the original anamorphic material. If I then export it and the Windows Media Player on 4:3-format "pull", we see that the bar just jumps. Tonight I will look at the tips of Wiro try.
Antwort von robbie:
"Tobi23" wrote:
... and stretched from the original anamorphic material.
If it is 16:9, then it is here but not be squashed. Because my screen shot, so to speak, is synonymous anamorph. If it is stretched, then it is either 4:3, or you've got in with a 16:9 anamorphic lens included, then the picture would be something in the direction of Cinemascope. I think not. And why exportierst you are in 4:3?
Antwort von Tobi23:
I now have just exported in 4:3 and beams created in Photoshop and drübergelegt has worked flawlessly.
Antwort von robbie:
If you want to have it so ... the optimal solution, it is not ...
