Hello! I'd like to buy a cheap camcorder. The fact that these things at a price range of under 400 EUR no clever shots in poorly lit areas that I have now learned. The only question is can a camcorder with 3CCD (NV-GS180) better shots in poor light than with a 1CCD (NV-GS27)? Or I can save the money, because they both have poor picture quality, then I would be cheaper for Panasonic NV-GS27 access. What is actually with Canon Sonyaus or how many euros you have to expect to make a 3Chip to get? Because what can you recommend (better / worse than Panasonic up?)?
Thank you!
Antwort von Axel:
"Joe77" wrote:
... no clever shots in poorly lit areas that I have now learned. The only question is can a camcorder with 3CCD (NV-GS180) better shots in poor light than with a 1CCD (NV-GS27)?
Bad light is bad light. A 3CCD makes for even better low light colors. But the whole situation wischi-waschi, so the recordings are not a useful Deut. This is synonymous for the oft-Lowlight capabilities. The only exception is a documentary recording of such explosiveness (the arrest of the drug boss is filmed with a hidden camera) that the quality of the recording is totally uninteresting. In cases of intentional use of low light (night driving, the driver is allegedly only illuminated from the cockpit, but synonymous a tape on a stage) is then of course: 3CCD is better.
Antwort von Norge:
Moin, Light is good only to be replaced by one, by even more light. Anyone who ever used a photo camera knows that without proper light does not come out good pictures. But of the super-high-tech troops camcorders is expected that they synonymous in complete darkness or as pictures in the midday sun. Sorry if I do I always read a thick neck. If someone wants to film in the dark, he / she is a residual light amplifier or a night vision device to buy. However, since it is not synonymous with the colors satisfied. For good images / pictures belongs nunmal synonymous proper lighting.
Mod's love, if I now had something rude then you are free to delete this post. I write, the air but made.
Many greetings! Norge
Antwort von ipscripted:
I have with a Canon Elura 70 and a Panasonic MiniDV camera in a church ienen MultiCAM shot done, and the canon had a lot more light, which is synonymous to ligt that it has a bigger objective. The color I can not compare because I do not pre-white balance could make both, but the panasonic (PAL) were saturated than the Canon (NTSC).
To be added: Image sharpness, the image of the Panasonic was a bit softer than the Canon, although Panasonic synonymous still had slightly higher resolution (576 lines instead of the Canon 480).
Antwort von birdie:
Clear Case! 3CCD videos are usually worlds better, speaking from experience, had some years with a 1CCD filmed, after the conversion is absolutely better, when I must send you each 2 sec video
Antwort von Markus73:
"Joe77" wrote:
The only question is can a camcorder with 3CCD (NV-GS180) better shots in poor light than with a 1CCD (NV-GS27)?
Hello,
I had this time a GS27 and GS180 own use, can be good to compare. What are the colors: The GS180 differentiate better, delivers more realistic colors, while the GS27 is sometimes a bit muddy or synonymous exaggerated tones produced.
The main difference is, in my observation, but the resolution, the Picture of the GS180 is a lot sharper than that of GS27.
What Lowlight is concerned, the GS180 is a little better, yes, but not much. The performance in low light is mainly of CCD pixel size and number of states but not of whether 1 or 3 CCDs are available.
Generally speaking, I have the feeling that the GS27 for a 1 - CCD Camera is quite good, because I have seen much worse. On the 180 it comes but in no case approached.
Gruß, Markus
Antwort von ipscripted:
yes, scho clearly, but the optic ne synonymous plays major role here. Large, light optics and a large sensor (1 or 3 ccd) are important in low light, low noise, and possibly light amplification.
Antwort von Jan:
It was already almost everything said.
The GS 180 has at least one accessory shoe, which then "in contemplation" a light on it can be set at the GS 27 must then be an extra track purchased.
For the GS 180 are synonymous zb mitglieferte SW with the USB cable, remote control, headphone output, microphone input, S-video output, camera data einblendbar (exposure).
At the 0 Lux Nachtprogamm and the 16 / 9 mode, the GS 180 outer me now not because it is not actually a real advantage for the model is.
But even the cheap 27 GS even has advantages of less high zoom, the more good wide. Degrees inside the film are 36 mm Focal love GS 180 has 3 CCD due in class only 47 mm - without a converter which then can be a pain.
Test pictures GS 37 (GS 27 same image) and GS 180 of VAD
Mod's love, if I now had something rude then you are free to delete this post. I write, the air but made.
No problem, you were very objective and have basically just write what everyone experienced user thinks when he reads such questions. ;-)
"An unnamed guest wrote:
3CCD videos are usually worlds better, speaking from experience, had some years with a 1CCD filmed, after the changeover absolutely better ...
Are synonymous different eras compared (for years with a 1CCD filmed, then switch to 3CCD)? - How can I see synonymous: My 1CCD recordings (CCD-F250) were forming far technically not as good as my later 3CCD recording (DCR-TRV900). Who knows these two models, know what I mean. ;-)
