| | | |
| 60 minutes Time lapse 3200-fold speed
Question of artskuz: April 2006
Hello,
I just wanted to bring a little something in experience.
I aufgzeichnet behind my house an hour clouds, until the tape in my Canon MVX4i was full.
Subsequently captured in Premiere Pro 2.0 (Pal standard) and time-lapse to about 1 minutes 42 seconds.
In the first experiment, I've got several effect placed on it, (lighting, rgb color correction, Difference Key dust, and scratches) that I have reversed, since the rendering process would have taken 24 hours otherwise.
Now I put effect on it for effect and then render each time, then no longer just taking so long.
My system:
Dell Dual Core 2.8 Ghz 1 GB Ram 250 giga hard drive and windows XP Media Center Edition
Am at the moment as only the lighting effect s.Rendern on it, which lasts 3 hours!
Or, the program calculates all the new effect in the current rendering process, ie, the previous rendering process again ineffective, because the effect a new effect on the prior Effect?
I try to teach me as much as possible myself, but here I do not know next, especially the video will be yes only 1 min 42 sec long.
The starting material was an hour long, I've got it now gestrecht, but I feel as if the Calculator (Premiere), the material after treatment as before as if it were one hours
Is it normal that it takes so long?
Or you can save with a few tips that precious time?
Can you help me there?
thanks in advance
artskuz
Reply prem:
So I would make it very simple:
First you make the material to the desired length, so only the Time Lapse Effect, then you play from the timeline as an avi. In the same codec, as you've recorded.
Then start a new project and the short avi reinladen again.
Then, all effects should be applied only to the short version and the rendering time would be acceptable.
Reply artskuz:
Dankeschön
which would then try some when I have time
Gruss
| |
| |