External Micro for interviews with 3,5 jack searched
Frage von Addie: August 2009
Hello,
I'm looking for a suitable micro Interviews with 3.5-plug for the Canon HG20.
I once had a dynamic directional microphone of Audio-Technica, I think ATR55 or something, but I found her very weak on the input level, so I s.PC in post hochaufreißen had always right, what with the noise floor increased.
On the other hand, it was extremely sensitive to touch - that is, when holding and moving (: what indeed happens in the interview situation) was every little movement, synonymous to the cable, with added super annoying.
Therefore, I thought the one s.ein (a condenser microphone due to the higher input level, is it ever right?). On the other hand s.ein vocal mic, because I think that to somehow touch must be better shielded when singers hold the mics in their hands and do not synonymous contortions! ;-)
Furthermore, it should have a reasonably useful windbreak (; the fact of my old brought NOTHING AT ALL), or you can buy sowas synonymous in retrospect?
Do you have any recommendations? There must be a best choice, I really want to stay under 100 ¬. Or do I overlook something important?
Antwort von Johannes:
Auja, T.bone Em9600 with Rodedeadcat And this e815S or a Sennheiser E822. Take in for surveys, because the real stability during the times you fall down and still go. These are dynamic, so do not need power and thus synonymous good for a spark gap. A Windschutzt get the foam for a few cents a Windfell I think $ 10. This then an XLR adapter and Kline, you're pretty well equipped.
Antwort von Addie:
What is Rodedeadcat?
So you think in any case, a micro with XLR connector and then a adapter for the jack? Really wanted the deal, but if that does not make any problems (; wobbling, quality loss or anything), then I watch the time on.
Antwort von Johannes:
When located at a Sennheiser E815s and the adapter is really high quality. XLR is very robust and stability during use. At a micro where the cable is already off, it can happen quickly through the transportation by a Wackelkontak ensteht, you simple change the adapter, otherwise the whole path would Microsystems. I myself have been working with a fairly cheap adapter 1 years with the t.bone em9600 and had no noise. So you can only make it bedenklos times. However, the cable should not be too long.
Antwort von Addie:
Okay, thanks for the advice. Rode Deadcats I have now synonymous strapped ... ;-) The t.bone Micro looks almost exactly like the Audia-Technica what I had, but that is not synonymous t.bone so sensitive to "touch" noise?
Otherwise: it would be an external micro video like this of Rode
http://www.thomann.de/de/rode_videomic.htm
synonymous suitable or is it already too far away (from the caller, can not very well with the lens to go s.seine nose ...)?
Addendum: Sennheiser E815s not it seems (; more? Give) to not, at least at Thomann.
Antwort von Johannes:
404ERR
Antwort von Addie:
All clear. In the 822 adapter does not there when I understand it is, then I guess sowas here?
As Windfell for e822: http://www.thomann.de/de/beyerdynamic_wj_82.htm
Although I had never been in this Microphone problems with the wind. I have (a foam protection; Popscreen) from the transmitter on it and never problems. They're just not as sensitive.
Antwort von Addie:
Aaah, great, I've searched this, thank you.
Now only time one thing: why 2 mics? I suppose, because each in a given area is more suitable. What do you take for what?
I tend at the moment tend to Sennheiser.
Antwort von Johannes:
An atmosphere for the camera, I have a directional microphone for interviews I'll take the e822. Take the 822 and you are on the secure page. If it is not the right thing you can do it within 30 days of return. Otherwise, you will report to me then I'll take it;)
Antwort von Addie:
Alright, so the t.bone as a kind of appreciation of the camera's internal microphone. I had s.der HV20 synonymous doing this, and on the supplied flash shoe holder for the tape drive, the vibration was so so withübertragen, even louder than the internal Micro, so I still had to buy an extra spider. This small Beyerdynamic of the hot shoe for 25 EUR ...
Antwort von Johannes:
If you have a HV20 have the t.bone is not the right vll. So in a camera with XLR Recommend this already. Otherwise, as an alternative for the Inter micro Rode VideoMic could http://www.thomann.de/de/rode_videomic.htm
or Sennheiser MKE400 http://www.thomann.de/de/sennheiser_mke_400.htm
go. These will be here very often been said, and next. From this you can Freiauswählen one of them, without you a thought about making serious mistakes in the choice to have to.
Antwort von Addie:
No, no,
Did I have a HV20 ... now HG20.
Antwort von Johannes:
By size only. That leaves as described above.
Antwort von Addie:
Why do you then meant that the t.bone the right one? Because it is so long? Was the ATR55 synonymous, but not bothered in the Picture. Only problem was the noise of the tape drive.
Antwort von Johannes:
Primarily because of the length. The Rode VideoMic is out of very well-coupled and therefore well suited. If you are larger, but does not bother then take it.
Antwort von Addie:
The Sennheiser 822 is now come with the cable. However, the cable is apparently broken, the front is a ring on the jack somehow lose, so I could not even plug the cable into the HG20 is. Stupid. I must return again and order a new one. At the moment so I can not give feedback.
The t.bone I have now pushed back erstmal. Maybe later.
Antwort von Addie:
Hi John,
Now I have to annoy you again, I do not know if I make it all really. I know there is not any, absolute Micro layman!
So now I have the Sennheiser 822 and the adapter, XLR to 3.5 jack, which you have recommended to me. When I connect the so s.3 ,5-jack, but the HG20 is no signal. Although I am not quite sure if I have not the cable broke with this stupid screwing s.diesem ring, which was not in any way, thread seems to be in the bucket. Now I have again because of what phantom power that is needed and must be connected between Micro and cable (and if I have correctly understood it), first.
So now I still need something extra? I just want to connect only one external micro without an additional part in between. Is that mti the Sennheiser and the simple adapter cable at all? I probably synonymous a board in front of the head ...
Then it struck me: The t.bone probably synonymous falls away, because I can not place them on the HG20. Since this is in fact stupid mini-advanced-connection, since you can not place them popular bracket or spider, is probably only original Canon accessories, if I understand it.
Sorry, I am turning a bit s.Wheel grad ...
Antwort von Johannes:
Hi, Thus, the e822 is a dynamic ball micro and needs no phantom power. I have tested it and I just went, so it could be just s.deinem cable. I do not know the HG20, but it is possible to set the input level a little higher? The Dynamic microphones have a very low input level.
Antwort von Addie:
Okay, thanks, I wanted to know.
Then I look again. At Micro s.Hinweisen was completely nix / description, etc. here, that is really the ONLY naked in Micro Thomann board, so I was unsure. Thought there would still clean as a battery in my old, but found no subjects ...
Maybe I'll get a cable or again let the time of check out a buddy here ...
Antwort von Johannes:
For me, it was then only the Micro synonymous with nothing. Seen what you want to describe it synonymous large. Now I have to ask even stupid, you had it turned on?
Antwort von Addie:
Yes, was on ... ;-).
've Rausgefunden, was actually s.Kabel that Jack was gone. Now I can get. The input signal is not superhoch, but the background noise compared to the internal micro to small worlds. Must we now play around a bit: how low / high you set the input level, how close the speaker goes to the Micro to get the best result. Thanks for your help!
