Frage von Lawrence:
Aloah,
I have read all the available posts relating to their remuneration and polarizing filters, it had two questions:
1. Which is the better multi coated? HTMC (8 layers) or MRC (how many layers is this?)?
For I have the choice between B + W MRC or Hama HTMC.
2. Most of the filter, for example, in this case polarizer are indeed available for cameras. Hama yes synonymous specifically to provide filter for digital 'camera' (as synonymous camcorder digital SLR). Are there differences or it is in principle no preference?
I've already have a 43mm polarizing filter for my Panasonic NV-DS29, but by New Year's Eve (of 2 years ago) is still pretty advised affected ^ ^. Therefore, I will buy me a good (!) Polarizing filter for my NV-GS400. According to the opinions that are circulating here (and elsewhere synonymous), B + W is said to pretty much be the market leader, with regard to quality. If this is not entirely true, please correct me.
Antwort von Stefan:
Ad 1 Older test:
http://www.hama.de/webresources/service/test_results/2004/00072772tur_FoMa_0901.pdf
http://www.schneiderkreuznach.com/knowhow/mrc.htm
C
R C I think is not important, or in "wet" photographic situations, even counterproductive. On the other hand - who starts at Nebel-/Regenwetter a polarizer?
In http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/pdf/B%2BW_filter_handbook.pdf is 56/57 s.Page to the point. "The MRC coating for polarizing filters do not exist, but the coating is adapted to the respective filter.
Ad 2 There are differences
"It should be used (especially in digital cameras and analog autofocus cameras) circular polarizing filters, as components (particularly in a camera TTL exposure metering and autofocus) to evaluate themselves and polarized light sensors so they could provide false readings."
(
Antwort von Lawrence:
Aloah,
Thanks for the replies.
Ah, so this is the real difference is whether or not for digital equipment: If the filter is linear or circular. OK, I'll take a circular filter, was clear to me.
For additional question;)
I had the filter on it, because I wanted to protect my lens. But actually, you can unscrew synonymous think that I had forgotten after copious consumption of alcoholic beverages, because I already s.hellichten days had filmed. I also wanted to prevent s.Objekten reflections.
But I have the polarizer tried once with my new cam today and must say that still works very well, despite little outward darker spots. This can be seen but not properly recorded Picture! For now, I will therefore use this next erstmal yet.
Antwort von Markus:
... despite the darker outer small spots. This can be seen but not properly recorded Picture! For now, I will therefore use this next erstmal yet. These "spots" is called vignetting. And the reason why you do not see the shadows on the television has to do with the overscan too.
Now you have two words for the search function. ;-)
Antwort von Lawrence:
Aloah Mark
Both concepts are familiar to me. I do not think that this is a vignetting, so I used the word 'town'. I would imagine that these small spots are the result of Sprühfunken sparklers. Because the spots are not s.Bildrand, but the middle of it and everywhere;). By 'external' in my last post I meant the outer layer of the lens, that is out there, get close where environmental influences, not the inner page, the s.Gewinde is screwed. 've Described a little ambiguous.
I have nowhere synonymous 'mentioned Television'. And on my PC TFT, there is no overscan area, up from Premiere / After Effects as a display option;)
Antwort von Markus:
Well it is if you do not have specific information and are dazudenkt his part. PC-TFT You're synonymous had written anything ... ;-)
