Frequent firmware updates obstacle for Blu-ray?Of heidi - 11 Apr 2009 11:05:00 Blu-ray as a distribution format for high definition movies of consumers will remain reluctant adopted. The market share of DVD, which remain above 90% (according to a recent, of us verlinkten Studie This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von ed-media:
Then you take hold a media player and it is good.
I think that the Media Player with responsibility, that the sale of Blu-ray is stagnant.
Antwort von Heinz07:
I think it has more synonymous other reasons. If I were a movie with action ever in a good quality DVD've seen, there is no reason for me again this should be on BD. This is usually boring. So come rather only new movies in question. Since the prices are still somewhat high, so just get in the video goes. Exceptions are imho since the only real movie lovers and collectors and alone does not bring into the mass market roles.
You should have the DVD can slowly fall asleep and / or worsen the quality that would probably be more migrants. But we want it? Where a well-made DVD already very close s.eine average BD rankommt. The quality jump is simply not in any case large enough for the price surge to justify.
Gruß Heinz
Antwort von MK:
"Heinz07" wrote:
and / or worsen the quality
Make some major studios already ... Color, soft picture, artifacts, despite a high bitrate, and the Blu-ray looks like geleckt of course ...
Antwort von Axel:
"MK" wrote:
"Heinz07" wrote:
and / or worsen the quality
Make some major studios already ... Color, soft picture, artifacts, despite a high bitrate, and the Blu-ray looks like geleckt of course ...
If such a thing with intent deducted, it would be for me a reason to protest boycott. BTW: Have you ever watched a (good) to a DVD (also good) BD applies, if the player does 1080p upscaling via HDMI and TrueHD s.einen TV is? Perhaps even more one of the newer 200Hz devices?
Who as a significant quality boost sees a specially cultivated retinal implant have and will probably synonymous to the real environment say "color, soft picture, artifacts, despite high bitrate" ...
Antwort von Quadruplex:
"MK" wrote:
Make some major studios already ... Color, soft picture, artifacts, despite a high bitrate, and the Blu-ray looks like geleckt of course ...
Ui! Conspiracy! Evil industry!
Sorry - that's what is nonsense. There are in practice all possible constellations: The Master of the DVD is already a few years old; for Blu-ray is the new film with the state of the art sampled (sometimes even restored) - clearly sees the Blu-ray better. Conversely, there's enough films in which the Blu-ray version of Money is really kicked out, because providers do is the same modest cinema copy of the Blu-ray Disc had as for the DVD. Ergo: We see little difference. Good and bad image quality was synonymous's already on DVD. Who wants to know whether 'ne disc's worth, you must stop times previously in' ne reliable magazines or on the 'look its website ... It is also interesting: 12 years ago, nobody has excited that DVD looks better than VHS ... And if the manufacturer customers toward Blu-ray crowd, there's a much simpler way than the quality to deteriorate: The film appears first on Blu-ray - or is no longer on DVD.
"Axel" wrote:
Get ready for a (good) to a DVD (also good) BD applies, if the player does 1080p upscaling via HDMI and TrueHD s.einen TV is? (..) Who as a significant quality boost sees a specially cultivated retinal implant have
Ne - 'nen good television - and a little denser rang deal. FullHD worth living room with the usual distance from the screen until s.einer screen diagonal of 1.27 meters (50 inches) or more. Who with 'nem 40-inch four meters away looks, do not be surprised if he sees nothing.
And, yes: In good mastering good player and DVDs already look damn good - that is synonymous with security the main reason that it does not bang and all still only buy Blu-ray. But sooner or later will be at least the so-called A-brands only Blu-ray player to offer - s.DVD players deserve nothing but the more ... And the Blu-ray discs are synonymous cheaper.
Antwort von MK:
"Quadruplex" wrote:
Ui! Conspiracy! Evil industry!
Sorry - that's what is nonsense.
Of course, it is parallel to recent publications, and if it does not intentionally made worse by the people to Blu-ray to push, then stop because the production of DVD Money is saved (cheaper Authoring Studio, etc.).
I can tell you that in any case we already had such requests with the notice that the DVD is not reference quality to have ...
Antwort von Quadruplex:
"MK" wrote:
Of course, it is parallel to recent publications,
Then nenn but a few titles.
"MK" wrote:
and if it does not intentionally made worse by the people to Blu-ray to push, then stop because the production of DVD Money is saved (cheaper Authoring Studio, etc.).
It will certainly result in many ways to the DVD. But at least for the major studios is usually a high-resolution master created, then of the DVD as Blu-ray will be produced. I am happy to teach a lesson, but how can we have to consider both the technical boundaries of the quality can be foul, it is unclear to me.
If a provider decides, however, for the DVD production ten-year-old master and provided exclusively for Blu-ray can produce a new, sees the matter differently. That may happen - very clever but it is not not. And so far, unfortunately, is really still the case more often the reverse: the absence of better presentation, the Blu-ray is little better than the DVD. What really where it is, it depends of many factors (including the exploitation rights for the country, access to quality (or even synonymous shitty) copies that a general statement is hardly possible. Either you are 'ne way, the quality before purchase to check out - or the magazine / website of his confidence.
Antwort von Axel:
So around stimmts. When the first DVDs came out, were now all agree that VHS could no longer see, so much better was the quality. But: Even VHS was better by leaps and bounds if it were the same movies, the synonymous parallel on DVD.
So I bought a few DVDs (so about 20) of my favorite movies. In between there was incidentally DVDs that looked like VHS (The English Patient, The Fifth Element, Taxi Driver, Boogie Nights) and only partially re-mastered again appeared.
When Toshiba abandoned HD, I got an HD player almost a gift. My first washer was Shining, synonymous I already have on DVD. This was again a difference of VHS to DVD, particularly via HDMI. But the newly produced synonymous Additional material was fat and had five times the price is justified.
But: The Movie synonymous got a new DVD edition, in which he also, as in the specialty magazines to read, looks better than ever, with the same extras. What Quadruplex 'thesis based on the fact that behind all this is no bad intention.
Antwort von MK:
"Quadruplex" wrote:
It will certainly result in many ways to the DVD. But at least for the major studios is usually a high-resolution master created, then of the DVD as Blu-ray will be produced.
A title which is great Gemecker about the quality of the DVD as there was Pan's Labyrinth (artifacts, noise in dark areas, blurring), the HD version, however, were in order.
If you look at the big DVD forums around happens more frequently in recent times that the DVD version of recent blunders at Picture films which - maybe synonymous is the easy s.Authoringstudio ... at least one major label, I know that the cheap DVDs in France are mastered, the Blu-rays but in another studio in Switzerland.
And it's already priced a difference whether one single pass VBR or VBR with several rounds notes. There may, depending on the image content the best synonymous HD Master no longer optimally mapped on DVD.
In addition to various parameters on the source material. Since then even more times a stronger lowpass upstream to the encoder simple coding "feed" to serve.
