|  |  | |
| HD data volume and computing time normal?
Question of webwerner:
Mai 2010
Hi, I now have a Canon HFS10. This weekend I once made some test shots.
The nearly 42 minutes in full HD show almost 8GB on the card. In Final Cut (imported AVCHD -> Pro Res) then there are already about 40 Giga.
I have now cut a 4:30 min film from it and the render in Full HD 1 hours and the render in a suitable Vimeo video with Compressor lasted almost 2 hours long.
Are the traffic and the times normal for this material?
I have a MacBook Pro with 2.53 GHz and 4 GB of RAM and an internal hard drive with 7200 rpm.
Thank you
Reply Paul*Berlin:
I would say yes.
save more video on the SD card to be able to cut you in the camera, the bit rate.
On average, word won in Pro Res altered, so that you can cut smoothly, which makes a lot less fun!
Only then just delete the project files after editing, if the hard drive capacity is limited.
Generally speaking yes, compression strength and processing time related to each other more or less proportional, while file size and compression (and thus Processing) is inversely proportional to each other behave more or less ...
Have you then a 5 min HDV footage in the AVCHD codec and a 5 min HDV footage in MPEG2 format (if we go out of the same bit rate), then the MPEG2 file is indeed very many more, but can be easily cut.
Well, it actually synonymous logically:)
Reply srone:
I'm a big fan of axels brühwürfelvergleich (thanks, vivid GEHTS cut no more), each compressed harder ;-)
lg
SRone
Reply Jott:
With ProRes needs to go smoothly, is not normal. Without screenshots of all your settings remote diagnosis will always be a guessing game.
Reply Paul*Berlin:
But when he turns back again in AVCHD will be the lasted awhile. Question is whether he has already packed when rendering in AVCHD.
The Brühwürfelvergleich is great!
Reply webwerner:
So the camera takes on even AVCHD. I have found in 1920 x 1080 / 25p filmed. With imported log, and transferring or Final Cut Pro.
My Final Cut Pro settings are:
Simple configuration: Apple ProRes 422 Sequence (HQ) 1920 x 1080 25p 48 KHZ / Format: HD / Rate: All rates / settings: Custom / data limit: No / No fixed keyframes / Quality: 100
The first film I have on Export -> Export as Quicktime with H.264 in 1920 x 1080 / 25p / Optimal quality / PCM audio ausgerendert burn to which a good DVD. Render time 1 hour
The second Film I've spent the specifications on Vimeo Send To -> Compressor. H.264 / 1280 x 720 / data rate max. 4500 / AAC sound with 128 Kb / s It took about 2 hours.
The film has a length of 4:37 minutes.
Reply Paul*Berlin:
So you have exported as AVCHD. then it is logical that it takes that long. for a DVD, you need this resolution but not at all DVD only has a resolution 576 x Of 720th
and if you see the film then render again, of course, needs the long synonymous again. Since it would be better to convert the movie already created simple.
Reply Jott:
"With Quicktime export as H.264 in 1920 x 1080 / 25p / Optimal quality / PCM audio ausgerendert to burn Of a good DVD."
How do you get that idea? DVD has to do with H.264 times nothing, which is MPEG 2 For this you take the compressor, rausrendern before you need anything.
And ProResHQ is overkill, because what the. Take next time the normal ProRes, a difference can not you see. Do one of them for Masterfile's archive, so exporting as quicktime with sequence settings. It only takes a few minutes. mp4s this for video or YouTube s.besten you doing with MPEG Streamclip, which is clearer than the compressor and is generally synonymous faster. DVDs with Compressor / DVD Studio. All in a few minutes made.
Reply webwerner:
OK, let me tell you as I should not do bad stuff of other people ... :-(
Reply Jott:
Right. The art is to recognize the nonsense.
Reply webwerner:
I'm learning still.
Have your suggestions garde times "just trying", which is really much faster and above all simpler.
Thanks for your help!
Follow-up question: Would you use your 50i or 25p?
| |
| |
