I'm glad I found this forum here, because I have the past few weeks, wanted to make clever about a NEW DIGITAL CAMCORDER. But the market has indeed become almost impenetrable ...
Since 1990 I have only video with 8 and then filmed with Hi8. My cameras have always been the extent of Sonyand was quite satisfied. Now I wanted to switch to digital.
The recordings are s.Ende played on a PC with Magix and / or other premiere perfect little family film with effects, sound, title, etc processes. My calculator is of the end of 2006 Dual Core 2.66 GHZ 3GB RAM, 750 GB hard drive, Windows XP Media Center. Firewire port.
I think SD, HDD and Mini DVD comes out well so that only the alternative cassette again moves forward ...
Which cameras because there is still recommended. Maximum price would be $ 500 OK, if more is synonymous net bad ... If yes keep!
Thanks for tips Regards Wayne
Antwort von Markus:
"WayneD" wrote:
... If yes keep!
This aspect makes the matter is currently not so easy. The tape drives are more and more of repressed memory cards and hard disks, with the optional memory is still a deficit in the Nachbearbeitbarkeit and possibly synonymous archiving of the recordings have (bad compression format for current job s.Videoschnittprogrammen).
Your desire, synonymous with poor lighting conditions to film, today, a camcorder up to 500 ¬ less than able to meet your old Hi8 unit (depending on model of course). In the case of high-resolution video is the sensitivity to light once again worse than the previous standard resolution.
A practical tip, I have unfortunately not, because my camcorder this segment is currently not interested.
Antwort von jokol:
Hi Wayne. Search synonymous for a long time for something better or newer equipment. Have similar requirements as synonymous holiday and everyday images. When party pictures will be problematic, since it is already cut in the quality suffered with a price of less than 1000, - Euro for the device. My current idea of a new device: no HD but normal DV device such as the Panasonic GS500. Greetings: Jokol.
Antwort von kowi:
I would greatly appreciate if I lay still a DV-Cam would buy -> "If so hold!" However, the price of ¬ 500, - something very close! To 1000, - ¬, there are good HD or AVCHD Cams -> see here in the forum! I would use a HD Cam, eg SonyHDR-HC9 or Canon HV30.
Antwort von jokol:
Hollo kowi! In principle, fair enough what you write. But as far as I know until now could bring: 1 for HD bigger problems in low light. 2. Recordings from vehicles (cars, railways, etc.) synonymous problematic. 3. If you are in HD Cams (eg HV30) times synonymous with SD (DV) wishes, you get worse quality than with SD (DV)-Cams. Please correct me, should do something for my 3 shall score wrong. I'm ready to gather new insights. Greetings: jokol.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Especially in the HV20's so - and this is perhaps synonymous with the HV30 so - that some users have reported that an SD recording is slightly better if you record in SD.
But under normal circumstances you filming with HDV HDV devices, and converts some of the output from the camcorder to SD. Better still, cut it in HD, and converted only at the end.
The advantage, if you take an HDV device, is that you are now a very good, get high-resolution qualities.
Lowlight is a sensitive issue - and actually costs around 3000 euros. Synonymous but please make sure that SD camcorder here, not all are strong! The reduction of chips gabs synonymous with SD devices.
Incidentally, the SR11 is more light than the HC1, maybe then it would be synonymous an election (but careful, AVCHD content is much harder to cut than HDV).
