Frage von Gast:
If using a digital stabilizer (eg, the NV-GS75), a deterioration in image quality to be expected?
Greeting
Wolfgang
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
in principle, not because the required net 414,720 pixels for a good picture actually Pal of almost all models is achieved. The GS 75 has approximately 1.6 million gross pixels after deduction of the digital stabilizer is still plentiful. Since then synonymous with SD models (eg GS 75), the film only in Pal (And no more) on mini DV tape is recorded is sufficient.
Unfortunately, some anti bobble circuits or circuits to produce anti-noise and increased artifacts are thus eliminated as needed if possible.
Off with a tripod so no bad idea of the stability.
LG
January
Antwort von jens:
The GS 75 has approximately 1.6 million gross pixels after deduction of the digital stabilizer is still plentiful. Since then synonymous with SD models (eg GS 75), the film only in Pal (And no more) on mini DV tape is recorded is sufficient. In 16:9 mode, there could be possibly synonymous difficulties ...
Or?
Best regards,
Jens
Antwort von molch:
The GS75 has cs420.000 pixel active. may (we are not at 3ccd mal3) take
pixel when switched stable only 390,000.
because there is quality loss, because the cam needs to interpolate images for pal.
should generally but all the other cams that have switched to building more stable than 410,000 active pixels have no quality losses.
Antwort von Jan:
Hello you,
naja since opinions differ as in our Comparison 1CCD vs. 3CCD.
Ok, in principle, one can not simply adieren, but it can definitely divided say a 3 CCD model with a 1 per 400,000 Net pixels CCD model with approximately 500,000 in more than one image is superior assessment models.
In the photo section has been around Stress with Fuji's Super CCD (also a pugnacious field) where the company simply takes the megapixel times 2nd For a 3-megapixel model is then a 6 million Model (synonymous Relates to the camera) The reviews from the 3 MP Super CCD models certainly could not compete with 5 million Normalo's.
The anti-jelly or anti-noise circuitry circuits (why is the Samsung VP D 351 with anti-noise circuit is not better than a cause Sonyohne HC eg 17,22,32) increased artifacts was confirmed by a number of magazines.
I think with one tripod, and the GS 75 and switched digital stabilizer to conjure up an even better picture. Ok there's probably nothing free-hand, although the stabilizer of the GS 75 in some Mag's is considered deficient or sufficient.
Since some models with the digital stabilizer (I do not mean Sony) jerk strong to very fast with swiveling left immediately to counteract by electronics, could already be achieved by an improvement to eliminate in certain situations.
Why can eliminate almost all consumer models, the stability synonymous else?
LG
January
