| Image stabilization problems
Question of Mike2010:
Januar 2010
Hello, as a new member once all a friendly "hello" and much success in 2010!
And now to my question. - I, because often it's just no other way, with my XH-A1, a number of recordings made without a tripod. And who knows the camera, knows how hard it is. Accordingly, the recording part, very restless.
Meanwhile I tried the Bildstabilisationsprogramme of Magix, Pinnacle and Deshaker. Only the tracking program of After Effects (; trial version), but I do not want to buy, we found reasonable results.
Is it possible to fix with DadMercalli (; Magix) or Deshaker the motif, which is vertically and horizontally as synonymous in the axis (in the Picture; moving slowly), to? And if so, with what settings? Is there another program that works like the image stabilization of After Effects? - Thank you in advance!
Reply derpianoman:
... Have, because often it's just no other way, with my XH-A1, a number of recordings made without a tripod ...
Howdy!
For the future: I am a big fan of the monopod. Since there really is no excuse that does not always have this, right??
VG Klaus
Reply B.DeKid:
As a little tip - if you want to use a tracking as it provides stability s.eine example Aufloesung of screws 1920 x1080 down to 1280x720 for example ;-)
See VideoCopilot and imagine it in 1920x1080 and movies but give out only in 1280x720!
MfG
B. DeKid
PS: You can still synonymous with Virtualdub to test plug-ins ... ner but with additional "Letter Box halt kaschierst s.besten something ;-)
Reply domain:
Should you have the Deshaker tested with the default settings, then surprised me thy unsatisfactory test results do not. You can set the parameters in pass 2 but so that the picture is horizontally, vertically and nailed synonymous with rotations.
One thing all these Programs have in common: they can choose to pan and "Shaken differ. If the unwanted motion in the picture of you, then, is correspondingly slow, then of course, is not Deshaker.
Reply Mike2010:
Hello
Do I have to thank me now for the clever contribution of Derpianoman?
But you Domian thank you, for your answer covers exactly my problem. The fast "camera" has even the camera's own image stabilization has largely neutralized, but the unintended Schwenker are a real problem. Theoretically, the control of their neutralization synonymous Deshaker would allow, I would imagine, but I do not know how. I'm sitting on a very long time now and do not come next. A good tracking program like After Effects would be the solution.
VG mike
Reply domain:
Do you have increased during the time the Deshaker Panningwerte in Pass 2 of 400 to 40000 and also set the Edge Compensation on fixed zoom (no boarders)?
Basically all of these Programs are always just a workaround. I use almost always at least a monopod, so much time and formality to be.
Reply Mike2010:
Hello Domian,
I know that with a monopod, but I now have time to make these recordings (without) and would be happy if I somehow have to Beka.
Incidentally before I had my question formulated diligently researched and tried some settings - so far without the desired success. Thanks for the effort.
Reply Mike2010:
Hello DeKid example,
thank you - your info helps me at the moment but not quite, because I have no tracking program, but if you know any other tracking programs that would be a great help.
VG mike
Reply Clemensch:
Syntheyes is a great tracking program. Costs, however, stop what synonymous, although not as expensive as AE but a little bit.
Sg
Reply derpianoman:
Do I have to thank me now for the clever contribution of Derpianoman?
Nope, You can blur everything next.
Reply derpianoman:
... Have, because often it's just no other way, with my XH-A1, a number of recordings made without a tripod ...
So when you have new eingezickt you so quickly here ". :-)
Then it writable times, why you - unlike the rest of the filmmakers --
FREQUENTLY can not use a tripod. In a real tripod so I could understand it. But a retractable monopod firmly have s.der Camera to draufzustützen and during the shoot somewhere - that should be possible. Or? And if your film situations are SO DIFFERENT (parachute jumps, etc.) - then a small (smart) mention would have done well! :-)
MIR had to buy a lottery with the monopod times very well done.
Sorry that I wanted to help you somehow ...
Reply Meggs:
All Entwackel Tools Free Resolutionund image quality. If you have shaky irretrievable shots willy-nilly, one must resort to such a tool. But I would not intentionally take blurred images in Purchase with the Entwackel tool in mind. When shaking indeed come, for example synonymous motion blur in the picture. After stabilizing the picture is indeed quiet, but blurred.
With the A1 can be relative, precisely because of their weight. Relaxed filming. Except for a 3-foot or 1-leg stand, you can use a breast synonymous tripod, a shoulder support or the like.
I think it's just a shame if the great picture quality of the A1 is botched by such tools.
Reply domain:
... that with the monopod, I know, but I now have time to make these recordings (without) and would be happy if I somehow have to Beka.
This is not always necessary, however, dependent of the shooting situation.
Even on TV you can see that especially current disaster reports must in principle be blurred to emphasize the timeliness and the nature of life and local stattffindenden recordings.
Do not worry about it, the Gewackle now become an integral part of our viewing habits, and it belongs in difficult situations easy to mandatory.
Reply domain:
- --
| |
