| Latest camcorder to unsexy?
News from slashCAM:
Oktober 2008
Latest camcorder to unsexy? Of rudi - 25 oct 2008 12:38:00
Stu Masch joke writes in his blog again very aptly about why many classic Camcorders Filmmakers simply not more of stool can tear. According to his view is actually generated by the new DSLR videofähigen initiated a paradigm shift, the major synonymous Manufacturer hardly ignore or miss but you can. This is an excellent fit to the persistent rumor that that Nikon may in 2009 semi embarking camcorder market wants.
This is an auto-generated entry
Reply Spaceman:
Great, so next! Full rules! Finally makes shooting fun ....
Reply Christian Schmitt:
Nikon and Canon both have not lost, so no professional track.
However, I do not think the Nikon is too much of a consumer solution is removed, the market is bigger and not so demanding.
Canon, however, it could really tear. The glass for 2 / 3 "build it anyway, missing only the body. And by EOS lens adapter was always yes s.der XL Series ...
To wirs NAB will hopefully learn ...
Reply Valentino:
Great, so next! Full rules! Finally makes shooting fun ....
What is clear is the absolute hammer, when in a Full chips then besides sound and Co synonymous nor the sharpness to deal with.
What fun it will still be I do not understand.
I'm just in a 16mm production and rotate it a couple of night scenes with focal lengths of 12 to 150mm with a aperture of 1.3 to 2.0. Because I would like a semi times see the times then so relaxed from the sharp hand can provide. Especially in hand-held camera is almost an impossibility.
But who needs Full necessarily, let it get quiet, I would be a camcorder with 2 / 3 "already complete enough.
I make the side for this 16mm production Makingof that I turn with a DVX100. The picture looks very much like movies tortzdem which is not really s.den 25p or Cinegama lies, but rather s.hervoragenden the game and the actors very well geleuchteten 120kW s.Licht.
Reply wontuwontu:
Great, so next! Full rules! Finally makes shooting fun .... What is clear is the absolute hammer, when in a Full chips then besides sound and Co synonymous nor the sharpness to deal with. What fun it will still be I do not understand. I'm just in a 16mm production and rotate it a couple of night scenes with focal lengths of 12 to 150mm with a aperture of 1.3 to 2.0. Because I would like a semi times see the times then so relaxed from the sharp hand can provide. Especially in hand-held camera is almost an impossibility. But who needs Full necessarily, let it get quiet, I would be a camcorder with 2 / 3 "already complete enough. I make the side for this 16mm production Makingof that I turn with a DVX100. The picture looks very much like movies tortzdem which is not really s.den 25p or Cinegama lies, but rather s.hervoragenden the game and the actors very well geleuchteten 120kW s.Licht.
@ Valentino
You want to really tell us that it is not enough a CameraLink with a huge great chip to have? It takes so much more synonymous other things, so you s.Ende perhaps could even say that the size of the chip only a minimal proportion of production has s.einer horny? Is that really you serious? You must be completely mad.
The mere fact, as the people on the new DSLR react, but already shows, the market for what these devices are built. And the semi is really the limit.
Is it not that the D90 than 5 minutes to record it? I think there will be some time before we here of "the market" can speak.
Reply Spaceman:
Man but here are many concerns on the carrier ...
What you guys think why the Red One is selling so well? - Well, perhaps because of the large sensor? As people browse more than 20,000 to only $ für nen larger sensor? - For the least important and nebensächliste the world ...
Others pay up to EUR 10,000 for so-NEN adapter 35 of a large sensor is trying to imitate .... tststs crazy world ...
People wake up, it is just a new video era eingeleutet .... A bissel exercise, then klappts synonymous with the sharpness Pull!
For my part, I still bring after my HD video camera to the included adapter scrapyard ;-)
Reply Axel:
@ wontuwontu: You've totally misunderstood Valentino. He does not write, a large chip was not good enough for him, he writes that he, if he uses to full effect, which rotate much more difficult. Nix Auto Focus, and HD-sharpness is critical anyway, but with a very small DoF really no Zuckerschlecken.
@ Spaceman: Today Captagon with random speed and stirred with espresso runtergespült? If a bit manic over thy cheer.
Reply WoWu:
@ Wontuwontu
Look at some of our demos on the Internet due to the sharpness of it is really in the majority wrong.
Valentino has absout Law, Full (more than 35mm film) for video is really quite dementia and also for most genres are not to be used. Now I come from the docu-corner and need really sharp images. Material, as shown in the demos, we would not fall television ... Then there is the Latest ... what should be so well? And what do you mean, like "ordinary consumers" to deal with it goes?
The Full-parts are thus likely to niche product, and maybe something for VJs.
What would be great if, in fact, 3 x 1.8 "(7mm focal in 2 / 3" I would be somewhat less) with a reduced number of pixels, but with larger pixel areas and more for GS transistors on the chip.
If you have the edge pixel area that is in the new codecs anyway for the (global) Bewegungsprädiktion outside the active image still needs synonymous Viewfinder represents, without any image content, had not only a good use for the pixel quantities would be found but a reasonable step in terms of ergonomics next come to us by the film technology is still in the Optics is ahead.
Reply Spaceman:
@ Axel: a little humor can not hurt, then you ironically meant the contribution of WontoWontu synonymous clear ;-)
Reply wontuwontu:
@ Wontuwontu
Look at some of our demos on the Internet due to the sharpness of it is really in the majority wrong.
Valentino has absout Law, Full (more than 35mm film) for video is really quite dementia and also for most genres are not to be used. Now I come from the docu-corner and need really sharp images. Material, as shown in the demos, we would not fall television ... Then there is the Latest ... what should be so well? And what do you mean, like "ordinary consumers" to deal with it goes?
The Full-parts are thus likely to niche product, and maybe something for VJs.
What would be great if, in fact, 3 x 1.8 "(7mm focal in 2 / 3" I would be somewhat less) with a reduced number of pixels, but with larger pixel areas and more for GS transistors on the chip.
If you have the edge pixel area that is in the new codecs anyway for the (global) Bewegungsprädiktion outside the active image still needs synonymous Viewfinder represents, without any image content, had not only a good use for the pixel quantities would be found but a reasonable step in terms of ergonomics next come to us by the film technology is still in the Optics is ahead.
Ok I'm sorry, I will mark meant ironically Posts and FAT RED. Covered it as I wrote it clear enough.
 |
Reply WoWu:
Well at least I'm with Axel in the best company of those who have not understood it ...
Alles klar, danke ...
Reply PowerMac:
I think Axel has been well understood ...;)
| |
