| Many beginners questions
Question of Dagonator:
November 2008
Hallo erstmal, ich bin in sachen Digital Shooting fairly new and will have a few general questions which are not only synonymous but the recording playback concern.
1. In what resolution are now perfectly normal films shown in the movies? I speak now not of any high-end cinema somewhere in Hollywood but from the movies around the corner.
2. I own a Full HD Television (Recently purchased) and will now begin with the shooting.
If I now record a movie with a Resolutionvon 1920x1080 pixels, how can I then s.Television watch?
Is a DVD and a DVD player or does it mandatory for full-HD Blu Ray? Can a DVD player to read data fast enough or can it come to Rucklern?
3. Is Full HD movies to DVD movies? (Probably not, or?) Blu Ray player in my eyes outrageous prices.
4. Which cameras use the professionals in Hollywood, for example, if a new big blockbuster is filmed? And what resolution are such "blockbuster" recorded? (No, I do not want me to buy a camera, I am interested only for technique)
5. 1080p stands for Full HD yes. 780p for the "Halbformat". So the Height of the image. zb 1920x1080 = ca 2:07 megapixels.
What is 4K? About 4 million pixels? or is the Picture 4000 pixels high?
I know, questions about issues but I'm really Beginners and try me a little to incorporate into the matter.
Reply B.DeKid:
Hi
zu1: 2K - 4K (8K)
zu2: By connecting your camera s.das TV
zu3: No - DVD (756 x 576) 720 x 576 format
zu4: http://www.arri.de/
http://www.red.com/cameras
http: ... SonyF35
zu5: Wiki 2K - 4K film format table *** grr because the bracket does not click the link http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/2K_ (film) and select the entry "2K_ (film)" - sorry
zu6: * Ah yes, the gabs not ;-) *
Alla what I wish
MfG
B. DeKid
Reply Axel:
At 1) is mistaken as DeKid. Here Man, the TV is blurred but today again!, And how often have you thought of in the movies?
Since there are so many factors, especially for analog recording, with the resolution (with)-decide it is worthwhile but not with great numbers to chuck.
In this forum sleeping dogs, for full resolution Everything lacerate what else dares to say "beep. So better quiet, shallow breathing ...
I whisper to you what so directly in his ear:
Resolutionist relative. Relative to what, you ask. At ALL. The figures are completely meaningless unless they comply with the other parameters be related. What is that?
Shall I enumerate about EVERYTHING?
Whenever we do - just for the moment - Further, the highest Resolutionwäre synonymous with the best and most beautiful images, which, for the cuckoo, wilt thou then with thy popel "FullHD"? Is it not at all. There are negatives to 35mm, up to 11k resolution creation of IMAX quite silent. The Consumer formats are scrap.
The moment is over, the finding is still hope. You like beautiful pictures and they want to do? Then forget the drivel on High, Full, True and "k", and make it easy. Beautiful pictures, there's not only since the last fair camcorder.
Keep's for you, let the others dance around the golden calf. Hats s.dein the wisdom to death camps, and they whisper synonymous worthy then only one ear ...
Reply Dagonator:
To point 2, there must have an HDMI cable ...
For the text of Axel:
The Resolutionist certainly not Egal.
I realize that there is always something better with even higher resolution. I photograph a lot and am therefore begeisteter amateur photographer. I know myself with technology pretty good and I've been because of my attitude with many people in forums and argument.
For a nice video or still image theory extends VGA resolution. For films less. The video is the same as Full HD or of me 11k or more.
But why not buy the product which most capture details as long as it can afford? The videos are not better but the picture quality is increasing.
Comparison with time of photography. In a photograph of a Forum has given me a message if I find it normal that I with a ¬ 15,000 to the equipment in my grandpa's birthday pictures. He would favor a compact camera and its equipment is used only for photo orders he gets paid.
I am someone who is annoyed when he was a Still Image recording and it is not in the highest possible quality.
It is no preference whether it was a Still Image or a video. The more details that are there the better. Whether family video, amateur film-film, or a James Cameron film.
A film by Innhalt lives, but a very poor image quality can pass the film synonymous very quickly do not do.
Pick times a full HD movie trailer out. The Internet's enough and then you look at the same trailer on Youtube.
And frankly, I am no preference with which Resolutionein movies running. I'm interested in is only for purely technical reasons. Since I'm fairly Technikvernarrt and I would be interested in how far the cinemas in Germany / Austria / Switzerland really are.
Reply Alan Smithee:
@ Axel:
Thank you for your wise words!
@ Dagonator:
A film by Innhalt lives, but a very poor image quality can pass the film synonymous very quickly do not do.
Pick times a full HD movie trailer out. The Internet's enough and then you look at the same trailer on Youtube.
Then the film does not live through the story that he tells, but by its technical qualities. S.sich This is nothing bad, but the really great movies (I mean those who write film history), the film with funds with a really good story telling.
Reply raymaker:
I am someone who is annoyed when he was a Still Image recording and it is not in the highest possible quality.
It is no preference whether it was a Still Image or a video. The more details that are there the better. Whether family video, amateur film-film, or a James Cameron film.
A film by Innhalt lives, but a very poor image quality can pass the film synonymous very quickly do not do.
Pick times a full HD movie trailer out. The Internet's enough and then you look at the same trailer on Youtube.
Has always been famous photographers trying to photographs from the'50s and'60s to imitate. Walking on the same mountain, looking for the same angle, and shoot her with the 1D Mark III Picture - and upload it to Flickr. And it just looks shit out.
And you know why? The good man had no digital processors that only simple 35mm cameras. The picture is in the head, and not on high-quality extra-Glare photo.
Reply Axel:
I am someone who is annoyed when he was a Still Image recording and it is not in the highest possible quality.
It is no preference whether it was a Still Image or a video. The more details that are there the better. Whether family video, amateur film-film, or a James Cameron film.
I did not realize that you have so much experience through photography searched. Resolutionverteufelt Am I high?
Would you have an older Nikon or Canon DSLR with Vollformatsensor and, say, 3 megapixels (because I know less), a new Ixus with 6 megapixels do not prefer?
And here, you know some of the parameters needed for a good image of nursing is crucial, from your experience.
Let us look at the question of the content aside, synonymous the truism that a Stradivarius in the hands of Andre Rieu is not so nice sounds like a cheap fiddle in those of Yehudi Menuhin.
You have a Full HD Television. Can he represent synonymous 1080p natively? This difference, there is still synonymous. 1080i is not better than 720p (which I do not say that this is bad). About half full and regularly entbrennen heated debates. But it is indisputable that only the 1080p resolution of the best side-panel TV ausreizt really. For you, when the resolution will make no compromises, it is only a single camera under ¬ 10,000 in Question: The SonyEX-1 (or EX-3). And the real HD purists here ever again doubt that this camera enough. They doubt even 4k Camera "Red", arithmetically probably rightly so. Perhaps that is something for you.
I hope you let us participate times s.deinen works.
A film by Innhalt lives, but a very poor image quality can pass the film synonymous very quickly do not do.
Pick times a full HD movie trailer out. The Internet's enough and then you look at the same trailer on Youtube.
More than that: I see I like your movie then click on the big screen. Is not it wonderful that modern, affordable camcorder technology is of the Resolutionher with the distribution of "Titanic" can? If your pictures in addition to the technical sharpness synonymous still carry a movie, I do not count on HD-addiction victims, but to the inspired Könnern ;-)))
| |
