|  |  | |
| Music and date reports
Question of joe11:
November 2009
The performer here is not a problem is the intangible, and one often gets the question a positive answer.
It is more difficult with the composer and lyricist.
Example 1: An interview situation and in the background trötet unintentionally in between the brass band - that would be heard softly in the interview.
Example 2: A film and sound recording of a live tape, for example, 39 seconds of a 3-minute song Gema. Here, the music is intentional, but is alluded to only briefly.
For example 1, I've read (and it can not find again) that this freedom of information outweighs the copyright. The music is just an afterthought to be unrelated to the content. You pay nothing s.Komponist, Gema, or others. (!?)
Example 2 appears continuous, but is the Gema-taxable? A colleague recently said "40 seconds are not synonymous Gema-allowed charges". I do not believe it, think it is also illogical and could synonymous investigate any written confirmation of this.
Again to clarify: I mean reporting - not movies or something. To Music of a commercially available audio CD is not synonymous.
Reply FabeX:
So points to above, I can give you no information synonymous (synonymous when I'm 95% sure as it is here legally) looks like .. But I'll still not because I am not a lawyer. And before I stop what I prefer to write down the wrong door:)
But what I never did quite evident .. you write of reporting.
That means you do it for broadcast. (times like this I go out)
The transmitter would therefore have before a contract with the AKM / AustroMechana (if you have) in DE GEMA. Thus, no problem.
If it concerns the field of WEB, which is (at least in Austria) is a loosely sache affordable .. I have not thought of myself until I've heard that ..
lg
andi
Reply PowerMac:
I think that at current reporting, the information outweighs the interest. If an interview Music runs quietly in the background, that would be legally valid for me.
| |
| |
