I have been employed longer an issue. Maybe you can help me yes.
I want my website to a film portal films for my own setup. With the goal that every website visitors without the preinstall a particular program to watch movies instantly online can be.
How can I create my own movies on my web page, so that of the visitors by clicking on "Play" now online in a very good quality on the site can be viewed? How should the film be compressed so that it does not consume as much webspace?
About your suggestions and your help I would be very happy!
Sincerely,
Julius Schindler
Antwort von Eugen von ...:
You can download the movies unload synonymous with Youtube (for some time been synonymous with better Resolutionals usual), which saves space and - more importantly! - Traffic (the latter may be a popular website by going into the eye, if the wrong contract = cheap). In the website, you can at any time, with movies at the Youtube available HTML snippets integrate. This works with the other portals as usual.
Antwort von derfilmemacher.de:
Thanks for the quick reply.
I had ever been in my video google video uploaded on youtube because you only up to a maximum of 10 minutes can upload.
Then I am but decided against. I want my movies to external server does not upload, where I do not know what it happening.
I want my movies on the web my website upload. The only question is how. (see above)
About more help I would be very pleased.
Thank you very much!
Liebe Grüße
Julius
Antwort von Wiro:
"derfilmemacher.de" wrote:
How should the film be compressed so that it does not consume as much webspace?
Hello, the most popular Web format are currently - Flash (strongly increasing) - WMV (very widespread and is still standard for many websites) - Quicktime (less common, but very flexible)
You know but certainly a website, which offers about what you like in mind. First review just as it did. It helps to start. Greeting Wiro
Antwort von derfilmemacher.de:
If I get my film in one of the three had compressed format. How can it be to play immediately on the website provide?
As an example as I hoped, I introduce the Final Cut of Apple Page. Here's the link: http://www.apple.com/de/finalcutstudio/
Approximately in the middle of the Page, there are movies (QuickTime) to watch in immediate top quality.
Suppose I have my film in a mov file converted. How can I get such a player in the homepage?
Liebe Grüße
Julius
Antwort von B.DeKid:
What to take for a program in order to tinker with the site .... have unknowing about all of Websites?
Antwort von beiti:
Quote:
With the goal that every website visitors without the preinstall a particular program to watch movies instantly online can be.
Sowas gibt es nicht. None of the browser can only play movies, the user must always be at least a suitable plug installed (which, depending on the browser more or less automated, but in any case take time).
The best jump you to the most frequently used to train and take the Flash video format, because the required Flash player, most users are likely already installed someday have (consciously or unconsciously). Without Flash installed, one could, for example, no YouTube videos (and many other programmed in Flash website elements) seen.
For Flash video works like this: The user must satisfy the Page Flash installed (it is, as I said, most of the case). You then tie your homepage programmed one in Flash Video Player (Flash file in SWF format), which in the actual video (in FLV file format) will play.
For the encoding, I recommend Riva-Encoder (Freeware). Welche Datenrate Du wählst, ist eine Frage des zur Verfügung stehenden Webspace; of der Datenrate hängt aber synonymous ab, with welchem DSL-Zugang man die Videos problemlos sehen kann. Ich würde derzeit - trotz der Qualitätskompromisse - nicht über 500 kbps gehen. Einfache Player, die Du kostenlos in Deine Homepage einbinden kannst, gibt es u. a. here.
Of course, that you with enough web traffic have enough - and that costs money, if it is worth what. Mega Web Traffic with flat helps you nothing, if the provider to many customers per server and then host your videos on the peak just run smoothly.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
"beiti" wrote:
None of the browser can only play movies, the user must always be at least a suitable plug installed
Beiti - You of course, technically speaking, quite right. But the fact is: In a current system running Windows - because of the installed media player - World Cup videos without that the user must deliberately install something, would be on a Mac because of the standard Quicktime Movs without further action of the user running. Media such as Quicktime player would incidentally synonymous MPEG-1-videos into web pages without murmuring play.
I think that is what the questioner with "without Preinstalling" meant.
Antwort von Wiro:
Quadruplex, you of course - technically speaking - is also right when you bashfully to MPEG-1 refers. But let's face it: who still MPEG-1 offers makes is easy to ridicule, not only with colleagues. It's just outdated and out.
But it must be every webmaster to decide what his audience is good. Greeting Wiro
Antwort von beiti:
Quote:
I think that is what the questioner with "without Preinstalling" meant.
I had the question more so interpreted that there is a smooth and widespread standard is. That really on all Windows PCs in the default browser WMV is playable (and all Macs MOV), I would not want to leave. Solo of WMV, there are so many versions, and not any older Media Player creates it own the necessary codecs message.
My idea was just that everyone who is synonymous only s.Rande Web Videos interested ever on YouTube or similar platforms, and was therefore now has Flash installed. (Of the whole animated Flash sites, which also require the plug and modem users desperation drive, I will not talk.) This is true then the browser and system and is across from my point of view s.Ende the better choice in terms of compatibility. You can then say: "My videos can be easily played on any computer on which synonymous YouTube videos to run."
Antwort von mov:
In today's time and in any case, the flash player to play, (google "jw flv player"). Since synonymous Flash now supports H.264, you can now synonymous H.264 quicktime files play without Quicktime on the system to require, and the file can be synonymous still be offered as a download.
I am hosting my videos on blip.tv, as I do the videos in the format to upload, as I want, and it is converted as a flash, but the original file, unlike Youtube synonymous displayed. The file can then even without hacks directly into a player eigebettet own, or with the blip player on their own site to be integrated, without their logo or name on its own website to have them.
Antwort von beiti:
"derfilmemacher.de" wrote:
As an example as I hoped, I introduce the Final Cut of Apple Page. Here's the link: http://www.apple.com/de/finalcutstudio/
Approximately in the middle of the Page, there are movies (QuickTime) to watch in immediate top quality.
Is a fine example of what I mean. It works only so easily if the system is already the Quicktime plug-in installed. On my own system under WinXP and Firefox 3 hooks it somewhere, the plug has been previously installed, but Firefox crashes when I play Quicktime videos will. If I were there with the (me of otherwise seldom used) Internet Explorer open, I get the video instead of a reference "Quicktime 7 Required.." The same thing all the other Internet Explorer users who have never been with Quicktime had to do. When I click on it, I will for Quicktime homepage and can download the plug, so very clearly is that for computer-Daus did not.
What I'm saying is: Take prefer Flash video. ;)
Antwort von raymaker:
[quote = "beiti"]
Quote:
My idea was just that everyone who is synonymous only s.Rande Web Videos interested ever on YouTube or similar platforms, and was therefore now has Flash installed. (Of the whole animated Flash sites, which also require the plug and modem users desperation drive, I will not talk.) This is true then the browser and system and is across from my point of view s.Ende the better choice in terms of compatibility.
Small Note: Flash has in Germany and in other western countries as regards the spreading of Internet PCs upwards of 99.5%. In some "rural countries is around 96%. Average of over 98%.
So no reason to grits as the Quicktime player anzutun. Flash is the answer, only right since H.264
Antwort von Quadruplex:
"Wiro" wrote:
But let's face it: who still MPEG-1 does offer slightly ridiculous
Why? Just because the format a few years old has? MP3 is already synonymous ancient ... I see MPEG-1 "only" a problem for the Webmaster: For good quality you need Yeah, higher data rate (and thus pay more for the server) than for comparable quality with newer codecs.
But this is' ne theoretical discussions - I see synonymous, that for most users Flash now no longer a hurdle. Personally I like the format is not - and because it is within the off-line video zoo and an exotic is hardly a flash program can process directly. For many webmasters, but even this will be an advantage ...
Antwort von beiti:
Quote:
synonymous I can see that for most users Flash now no longer a hurdle. Personally I like the format is not - and because it is within the off-line video zoo and an exotic is hardly a flash program can process directly.
Since Flash version 9.irgendwas can be synonymous with Flash h.264 format in other containers as FLV play, such as MOV or MP4. However, I know not yet integrated into websites freeware player, which support this.
Moreover, I fear that only older versions of Flash have really wide spread and thus compatibility of facial points today only FLVs in Sorenson encoding are recommended. This will only change if the major portals (especially YouTube) to completely change h.264 and thus the user to force update.
Antwort von derfilmemacher.de:
Thank you for the many hints and suggestions. I will be trying times with Flash. Let's see if everything works out. Bin gespannt.
Thank you for your efforts and a nice and relaxing weekend.
Since Flash version 9.irgendwas can be synonymous with Flash h.264 format in other containers as FLV play, such as MOV or MP4. However, I know not yet integrated into websites freeware player, which support this.
The jw flv player to play H.264 files in. Mov or. Mp4 format, and is free for private use. http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=JW_FLV_Player
"beiti" wrote:
Moreover, I fear that only older versions of Flash have really wide spread and thus compatibility of facial points today only FLVs in Sorenson encoding are recommended. This will only change if the major portals (especially YouTube) to completely change h.264 and thus the user to force update.
Bislng This is the biggest problem, but since flash is a small download, and even little flash apps, which they can be and ask the user whether they want to upgrade, the upgrade very easy.
The information that is outdated in my opinion, in the last 2 years have seen enormous changes in the online video done.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
A rather interesting discussion relating to just run in another forum: http://forum.hochzeits-video.at/index.php/topic,1952.0.html
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Eugen von ...:
"Bernd E." wrote:
A rather interesting discussion relating to just run in another forum: http://forum.hochzeits-video.at/index.php/topic,1952.0.html
Gruß Bernd E.
Here:
"that linked forum wrote:
The security risk of flash is in all respects to be large, as that of commercial users would be accepted, with the result that many, very many companies Flash on their computers do not allow.
should be synonymous as private users to write behind the ears. In companies, the Marvel of movie clips no preference which format anyway - like us - usually via employment contract expressly prohibited. Except flash are disabled Javascript synonymous and other potentially harmful gateways. We have firewalls synonymous already seen the usual video portals and ad-server block. This means that on ebay, Youtube & Co. to get there anyway. We are working strictly synonymous computer off. What the Indians need to network, only on a "lock computer" and checked into multiple LAN.
Antwort von Wiro:
Well, what is computer company is an entirely different site. I know in my circle know anyone who would not be able, on its Internet computers at home to watch YouTube. And all are still alive ;-)
I got me the website of the Threaderöffners views (www.derfilmemacher.de). It is given to films of about 20 minutes in length. For this reason alone, I tend to flash because of the very sophisticated streaming longer movies. Since Flash is currently unbeatable. And by embedding the object tag is not more complicated than in WMV or MOV, if you mastered HTML. Greeting Wiro
Antwort von mov:
"Wiro" wrote:
And by embedding the object tag is not more complicated than in WMV or MOV, if you mastered HTML. Greeting Wiro
but has a disadvantage of the legal background, that only one click to activate the plugins is needed by the embedding of Javascript can be deceived if a script like swfObject used. makes the whole usually synonymous easier.
Antwort von darklord77:
So I would like my videos here in the thread mentioned above as a Flash video available. The, in my opinion, the most outstanding advantage is the people then the file can not download on the website but need to get the Filn view. Keyword User bond and warung your rights s.den shooting.
Meanwhile, Microsoft has indeed synonymous the Silverlight system on offer. But is not yet widespread. This will, in my Anschätzung after, but in next time. Possibly. yes it would be interesting for you synonymous. This presupposes, however you're the topic with the Silverlight programming and sets apart a little deeper.
Antwort von Reimer Reimer:
Flash videos are synonymous on the calculator. You can see them with a few clicks to copy. Since many do not know, this is in fact a Type copy.
