My question, I've read almost everything to 720/p/50 or 1080i/p/50
Frage von lassecam: Dezember 2008
My question, I've read almost everything to 720/p/50 or 1080i/p/50
We want to come in the year a documentary shoot. Much landscape, water, etc.! Obviously, the material for the ÖR in top quality. My question s.euch which format should we take. Cam of Sony EX3! We thank you very much for info posts!
Antwort von Debonnaire:
"lassecam" wrote:
Cam of Sony EX3!
Why you ask, the answer if you already own hinschrei (b) st?
Antwort von domain:
Will probably actually not much different than 1080i remain. Every P50-format would be obviously better, but is currently with the exception of 720p50 hardly feasible and this format is even a joke s.sich, because of the "alleged" progress. In that case you can forget HD equal times, practically zero real progress compared to PAL. Those are synonymous, incidentally, the most recent messages in Konsumerzeitschriften: Why people buy on HD Television? The offer is extremely modest and the date is displayed rather worse than the old CRT televisions.
Antwort von lassecam:
Yes what nu! 720/p/50?
Antwort von meawk:
"domain" wrote:
Those are synonymous, incidentally, the most recent messages in Konsumerzeitschriften: Why people buy on HD Television? The offer is extremely modest and the date is displayed chlechter rather than on the old CRT televisions.
How right you have. That makes me wonder synonymous for some time, even though I already has two of these boxes have purchased. Good a 37 "LCD I use now synonymous for the PC - so far...
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"Debonnaire" wrote:
"lassecam" wrote:
Cam of Sony EX3!
Why you ask, the answer if you already own hinschreist?
To view the camera as it gets, but the format, with just the camera that should s.besten record. My favorite would be 720p50, as the public broadcaster HD broadcast in this format and be at least the ZDF synonymous for as an acquisition format choice. If you already know whom you want the material to offer, I would ask the sender what format you prefer.
Antwort von lassecam:
"Bernd E." wrote:
"Debonnaire" wrote:
"lassecam" wrote:
Cam of Sony EX3!
Why you ask, the answer if you already own hinschreist?
To view the camera as it gets, but the format, with just the camera that should s.besten record. My favorite would be 720p50, as the public broadcaster HD broadcast in this format and be at least the ZDF synonymous for as an acquisition format choice. If you already know whom you want the material to offer, I would ask the sender what format you prefer.
Ok, that is yes times ne statement. I know of course, the ARD and ZDF have the format. Only stelllt the question, a year and then shooting the wrong format? Therefore the question here is so synonymous to money and the day after tomorrow. (After 2010)
Antwort von beiti:
"domain" wrote:
with the exception of 720p50 hardly feasible and this format is even a joke s.sich, because of the "alleged" progress. In that case you can forget HD equal times, practically zero real progress compared to PAL.
You can quietly synonymous again to stop this "wisdom" to spread; s.Ende there are still a few unsuspecting beginners who you believe. The Resolutionvon 720p/50 is at least 2.2 x as large as that of PAL (1280x720 to 720x576), and comes to the recording rather than half full. On a HD screen that is a very significant progress towards quality PAL - and that you know very well. ;)
That you with the decision of the ÖR're not happy, we know now synonymous. Does not change the fact s.der. And if "lassecam" his film for the under Örs wishes, it is with direct recording in 720p/50 achieve a better quality than with a subsequent conversion 1080i/50. Schön 1080p/50 would of course, but that does not yet exist. Dreaming does not help next, if we now must turn.
Antwort von wolfgang:
So 720 is still 50p a full HD format, as well as 1080 50i. The format is roughly equivalent, simply because in 1050 50i deinterlaced by the flicker so much about losing that one at the Resolutionvon 720 sits 50p.
PAL differ quite considerably both formats, this is just so.
In the case of the EX1's still obviously the additional option of 25p in 1080 to film - what is particularly good if you do not have much moving scenes. Or yet in 1080 50i.
Antwort von lassecam:
So, I am now smarter werd not? I think that I am probably the EX3 to 720/p/50 run. Certainly there are some info of you. I thank you in advance for any further advice!
Antwort von domain:
Well I do not know really how are you in various photographs taken. For me, the only material Resolutiondes an increasingly important role when the content is rather weak, as for example in my own videos or photos ... Otherwise, I can still synonymous today, the quality of SD on television in Phoenix as well for documentation thrill. Private and typical in this matter was also synonymous to Mitfilmerei an uninvited "cameraman" in our camel trip in the Sinai with an ancient SVHS Camera. Good, I have the "factory" for ¬ 10 - bought out of compassion, viewed and ultimately even used. Has a really bad quality and I could therefore only be used as 20% PIP in my own video racks. Oddly, however, the sequences did for my partner, maybe more than my own recordings, Arabic sentimental because they were cut and they therefore had almost wept at the pictures of the tea with bombastically rührseeliger Music and sunset in the desert in Bedouin tents. Since I know only the ignorant can even pixel value to specify the sense of mediation, if synonymous only dimly hinted in the picture is obviously much more important. In any case, the female sex in humans is the pixel quality unimportant, it is mainly a feeling being ......
Antwort von deti:
If a camera does 720p50, then I would prefer this mode, because without significant optical losses 1080i50 it can do. But filming 1080i50 is the transformation in 720p50 less advantageous, because no deinterlacer works perfectly.
Of course, many people actually see the difference to be there and perhaps a small number of the actual interview. However, this synonymous ideal conditions, which you rarely find at home (broadcast data, decoder, display) - and there sits nunmal the target group of broadcasters.
I would not presume 1080i50 with absolute certainty of 720p50 between them, although I professionally every day to do so.
Deti
Antwort von PowerMac:
"domain" wrote:
Well I do not know really how are you in various photographs taken. For me, the only material Resolutiondes an increasingly important role when the content is rather weak, as for example in my own videos or photos ... Otherwise, I can still synonymous today, the quality of SD on television in Phoenix as well for documentation thrill. Private and typical in this matter was also synonymous to Mitfilmerei an uninvited "cameraman" in our camel trip in the Sinai with an ancient SVHS Camera. Good, I have the "factory" for ¬ 10 - bought out of compassion, viewed and ultimately even used. Has a really bad quality and I could therefore only be used as 20% PIP in my own video racks. Oddly, however, the sequences did for my partner, maybe more than my own recordings, Arabic sentimental because they were cut and they therefore had almost wept at the pictures of the tea with bombastically rührseeliger Music and sunset in the desert in Bedouin tents. Since I know only the ignorant can even pixel value to specify the sense of mediation, if synonymous only dimly hinted in the picture is obviously much more important. In any case, the female sex in humans is the pixel quality unimportant, it is mainly a feeling being ......
HD to use, does not reverse, the story to forget. This is a stupid accusation polemical and profoundly illogical. As it ran like this: "Come we now have an HD Camera and play with the rum! Main HD, we have an end in itself. So we forget the story and the film detriment of HD." Anyone who thinks so ran it, which is extremely naive. It could be any history synonymous with SD transport, or in HD and then better. Progress means that we do not stand still, but new use. Moreover, I think of your statement that women would be the picture quality unimportant, nothing. That is a totally unsubstantiated allegation. You can of an emotional extreme example s.deiner woman not to 51% of humanity close. What a folly! In extremely gefühlsduseligen shots you can synonymous with a mobile-resolution Satisfied be inflated s.Television want anyway nobody (neither male nor female) seen. Picture Test (HD versus SD) at the EBU were very well that almost every man at the right viewing distance provides a better picture. When next you want to view, women would have no preference image, then you may feel free to try to prove experimentally. Until then, this claim will land on the manure pile at Krause Bauer in Herxheim or in the land of fairy tales. That you can choose.
Antwort von domain:
This is my little Christmas gift with a deliberately provocative announcement, I could PowerMac times from his eiszeitllich frozen Utrakurzansagen thereof. Wishes you a Happy Christmas PM, you and appreciate your comments very dahier and of course you're right, but a little pause for thought my experiences in the last 6 months been synonymous, I probably times with myself represent .... ... Of course, it is so that images are not intentionally blurred and grieselnd and Shyce must be to effect, but conversely may 4K super-sharp images synonymous generate no particular impression, if the contents and transport are not right .......
