Frage von sFriend:
Hello,
with the new Panasonic SD9, I have read that the HD-Resolutionnur by pixel shift is achieved and it is therefore geschummel.
When one remembers the shooting and playback, whether it is via the pixel shift is doped or real?
Greeting
Antwort von miku:
That is not so easy to recognize right away, because eventually recorded picture anyway until the product is complex electronic manipulations.
But in general, camcorder with Pixel Shift Prospektbeteuerungen preclude all but a lower resolution than those with full-resolution sensors on
Antwort von Axel:
That is not so easy to recognize right away, because eventually recorded picture anyway until the product is complex electronic manipulations.
But in general, camcorder with Pixel Shift Prospektbeteuerungen preclude all but a lower resolution than those with full-resolution sensors on And what Cam "Full HD" pixel has? See
this
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Hello,
with the new Panasonic SD9, I have read that the HD-Resolutionnur by pixel shift is achieved and it is therefore geschummel. zzzzzzzzzzzz ...
How often because there's this discussion yet? Pixel Shift is a completely legitimate manner to achieve a certain Resolutionzu. That is so synonymous with comfortable corresponding test image templates check.
Even if the somewhat lagging Comparison: To view the performance of an engine to increase, you can naturally increase the engine capacity. You may instead but synonymous with more valves per cylinder, improved injection technique, etc. are working. The power is in both cases objectively increased.
As always, but there's limits: The FullHD mode is currently eyewash - after all, what one reads and hears, improves the quality compared to 1080 is not 1440 times.
Antwort von Meggs:
Even if the somewhat lagging Comparison: To view the performance of an engine to increase, you can naturally increase the engine capacity. You may instead but synonymous with more valves per cylinder, improved injection technique, etc. are working. The power is in both cases objectively increased.
Still strange that the high definition models of Panasonic fewer pixels on the chips than the standard definition models.
Or order from your Comparison to stay:
It would be strange if a car with 200 hp only half as large engine capacity would be than the 50 hp model from the same manufacturer.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
It would be strange if a car with 200 hp only half as large engine capacity would be than the 50 hp model from the same manufacturer. Hardly ... Look at some of our full-Ami to sled - which some have three, four or more liters - but just as much or less horsepower than a BMW blöder with two liters.
Antwort von Meggs:
Hardly ... Look at some of our full-Ami to sled - which some have three, four or more liters - but just as much or less horsepower than a BMW blöder with two liters. ... if a car with 200 hp only half as large engine capacity would be than the 50 hp model
from the same manufacturer
Antwort von miku:
Still strange that the high definition models of Panasonic fewer pixels on the chips than the standard definition models.
That is strange, video quality in favor of modest "megapixel" photos to sacrifice was never (or rarely?) Deny.
Thank you to the consumer, for the "megapixel photos" the crucial argument for buying a camcorder are. : P
Antwort von Meggs:
When the Pixelwahn a few years ago was going on was a different argument: Preferring many pixels on the chip were synonymous for Pal video correctly and important as the runterkonvertierte Picture demonstrably richer detail was recorded as a 1:1 picture.
Now reads: factor 4 hochjubeln, no problem, thanks to Pixel Shift.
Pixel shift was already established 5 years ago.
I think that even for a muck of consumers. 3 years ago there was a halt only SD format, as was the consumer with the mega-pixels on the chip curls. Now he is with the Full HD format lured, and the amount of pixels on the chip are trivial.
Antwort von miku:
I think that even for a muck of consumers.
Tja. Perhaps the consumer will be verarscht.
How else can this constant "Preisnachlaesse to 50% on everything except pet" explain. If yes nothing more synonymous with real 'schnaeppchen' to do when you only the price to 20 euros raufsetzt, then 10 Euro runterzugehen.
... and the amount of pixels on the chip are trivial. Probably they are das
The Van Gogh was synonymous no preference viewiel his images have pixel. : D
Antwort von Quadruplex:
... if a car with 200 hp only half as large engine capacity would be than the 50 hp model from the same manufacturer I have understood you. Since I am not the engines of all car models and auswenidg may have better things to do than look for you, I was the most obvious comparison is limited. But it would be written as possible. Check it out yourself to see if such a golf GTI not a few more ponies utner than the hood of a thick Audis ...
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Tja. Perhaps the consumer will be verarscht. Gaaaanz again slowly: In this case, Verarsche of the question.
