| Royalty Music
Question of Melbert:
Januar 2009
Hello!
How you can get your music Royalty? you have good tips for Royalty Music?
VG
Mel
Reply snakenic:
Times the search effort.
The issue was already addressed umpteen times.
I do not believe that you still learn something new which you do not synonymous over the search itself would have to find out.
Reply Pianist:
There are no tips for Royalty good music, because it's not a good Music Royalty there. All good composers are in the Gema, because it is for an individual composers would be far too expensive, even the extent of usage of his works to control and to ensure reasonable income. I are still waiting for someone to use examples of Royalty Music returns. So far, however, are those who say that there is synonymous Royalty good music, any evidence stayed guilty.
Synonymous irgendwovon composers must live, but they have very many years a powerful accounting organization, and this should be welcome.
Matthias
Reply meister hubert:
So zich of the film composers I know - including me - is ninth in the Gema. Why synonymous? Bring me no advantages.
Reply Alikali:
So far, however, are those who say that there is synonymous Royalty good music, any evidence stayed guilty.
http://www.bluevalley-filmmusik.de
Reply Pianist:
Oh my goodness ... You probably do not know what someone wants to express, if it after listening to a piece says: "Sounds like Blue Valley"? That is an insult, a kind of synonym for bad Royalty Music. Exactly these CDs are the ones immediately in the trash include.
Matthias
Reply benedika:
Try it with Music of "creative commons" (google)
Reply Gysenberg:
In my view there are two recommendations:
Stack Traxx of Digital Juice:
http://www.digitaljuice.com/products/product_volumes.asp?pvid=8
and Cinescore of Sony:
http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/cinescore
Reply Pianist:
People, what have you for a taste? That's all terrible. What should the film be something where you can use? Such things can really be any movie foul.
I'm saying: There are no usable Royalty Music.
Matthias
Reply Gysenberg:
Synonymous irgendwovon composers must live, but they have very many years a powerful accounting organization, and this should be welcome.
Matthias
From the powerful billing organization live mainly the powerful payroll organization itself and the heirs of the composers who have less than 70 years died. Today living composers feel rarely represented.
Reply Pianist:
From the powerful billing organization live mainly the powerful payroll organization itself and the heirs of the composers who have less than 70 years died. Today living composers feel rarely represented.
Can you find these general statements synonymous with concrete figures show? About 85 percent of Verteilungssume be entitled s.die distributed, only 15 percent for the administration on it. And whether heirs of composer get much distribution, which depends mainly depends on the extent to which the relevant pieces synonymous still be played. Why should living composers today do not feel represented? Whose music is used a lot, gets a lot of distribution, and whose music is little used, receives little. S.sich is quite simple, right? And who with the rules of distribution is not satisfied, can the members' amendments, which then either accepted or rejected. This happens every year.
Matthias
Reply Gysenberg:
Can you find these general statements synonymous with concrete figures show? About 85 percent of Verteilungssume be entitled s.die distributed, only 15 percent for the administration on it. And whether heirs of composer get much distribution, which depends mainly depends on the extent to which the relevant pieces synonymous still be played. Why should living composers today do not feel represented? Whose music is used a lot, gets a lot of distribution, and whose music is little used, receives little. S.sich is quite simple, right?
Matthias
So, slowly, the OT subject here.
Nevertheless, I note the following: The issue seems you aufzuregen what can only be due to that you're personally involved. Then I can understand that. Any discussion is always from a personal perspective and experience led. My experience is that all the composers that I know of GEMA are annoyed. As a producer, I am more than just annoyed because my Organistaion Picture of this experience has shown some of the authority in the wonderful film "Brazil" is. I experience as things that the "Brazil" presented fantasies nor credit would. If GEMA least would be co-publishing rights, the organization still had one for the customer comprehensible existence. And then the word "client" rather than curse is manifested. But that would be a long and interesting discussion is certainly outside of this forum.
Apart from this: Music is always a matter of taste. Basically, it is a problem with that success is equated with quality. Consequently, reflecting the music charts so high again. Pffff ....
Stacktraxx of Digital Juice offers - what the area Gema-free Music - can be partially (I repeat: Partial!) For my taste perfectly usable at. The things are in places musically bold, elaborately recorded in layers and can be dismantled in the correct context for my tastes better than all of the usable scrap in the Top 50. Most things are far away of the industry standard Kaufhausdudeltechnoambiente and just an aside: I have been to many productions for ö-r sender used and so far only received positive inquiries.
I hope to one day in the fortunate position I, for my productions a composer can finance (which is not too expensive, I know). Then there are only one or two people, with whom I could imagine to work together. For what - of composers specifically for individual projects produced TV - roars through the airwaves, I think for at least as large as the scrap-Gedudel this Schubidudida GEMA-free manufacturer. That, incidentally - we are of one mind - is almost completely unbearable. But many composers Gedudel is not less tolerable. Are synonymous by the profession since the same authors.
And that is precisely the point where your reasoning is wrong.
Reply Eggerd:
Hello
Royalty Good Music is obviously very subjective.
See times in http://www.highland-musikarchiv.com/home.htm
pure. Since I had never been what to grumble.
@ Pianist
_Rund 85 percent of Verteilungssume be s.die entitled _ausgeschüttet, only 15 percent for the administration on it.
If that's you really need is so mistaken You have relations with Gema. For the people I know is the ratio 85% for management and 15% smaller and for the beneficiaries.
mfG Eggerder
Reply MarcBallhaus:
I'm saying: There are no usable Royalty Music.
Matthias
Full consent. As a longtime member of GEMA, I think you look at the pole. Without exception, all the writers I know are in the GEMA. Without Gema is a general interest as a professional musician and composer ernszunehmender is not conceivable.
The claim that a composer GEMA nothing brings true exactly only if a composer has no commercial distribution, such as radio, TV, record publishing etc, ergo if he is so bad that it wants to hear None.
Once known as a composer in demand, there is absolutely no way s.der GEMA over, because otherwise the grounds of all expenses payable institutions avoid it. Neither does the individual authors settle, neither a channel nor a label. So you can basically out of the following formula: Bottles are not the GEMA.
On the other I find the use of Royalty Mukke super, because then you can hear a movie in the first seconds s.ohne level it is quite to watch them.
_Rund 85 percent of Verteilungssume be s.die entitled _ausgeschüttet, only 15 percent for the administration on it.
If that's you really need is so mistaken You have relations with Gema. For the people I know is the ratio 85% for management and 15% smaller and for the beneficiaries.
mfG Eggerder
This is Gelaber. GEMA distributes even 97%, which is not true of course, if the margin hardly the membership fee of $ 100 a year. That is apparently when your buddy is the case.
MB
Reply tillbaer:
So now what do I want to get rid synonymous.
1. I am a member synonymous Gema
2. Mich nervt s.der much synonymous Gema
3. Nevertheless, I need the Gema
It is still surprising how much most of the copyrights and the rights s.einer complete music production muddle up.
Ok, I get as an author by consumers on the Gema money for my work. But just for my work as a composer! The fact that many say you get only scrap Royalty is a bit exaggerated. But the effort to me as a 3 - 5 minutes piece makes, namely an average of 60 - 100 hours for composition, text and arrangement, and would like to do I get paid somehow synonymous. And if I know that I write for an Act may, of which I expect sales figures may take me more time. And for the money, what I get with Royalty titles could, I would take less time viiiel. So with a master worse outcome can be expected.
But this is true I do not think the core of your problem with Royalty Music. It is much more clever about arranging and producing. This makes the sound. The difference of good artisan artisan bad music. And for an arrangement and the pre-production of a single plane I approximately 200 hours. This much I will have paid more. Therefore, I would be angry if they work still synonymous in my Gema-royalties should be included.
What would you say because if someone you for the script to a movie like 500, - ¬ would give you and then he would hold for outrageous, because your in the production of your film synonymous still want to have money. You can but the movie just to see your costs and turn him away. The bit Rotate and Postpro would surely in the 500, - ¬ with his inside.
Who really good and popular music, it must also negotiate with the publishers and are friends with the Gema. Finally, the music is not immaterial to the success of a film, but to whom I say das
Who for good music does not want to pay, which must be bad or just do not use music.
Sorry for the novel, but this measure many filmmakers with a different scale for filmmakers than for musicians.
Greetings - Til.
Reply Eggerd:
Hello
GEMA and GEZ start with G at both. I do not think the two organizations to ensure the protection of their members goes. One wants to secure its own existence. With those who had to do should they occur over time to reflect. Of course, this is my subjective opinion.
mfG Eggerder
Reply tillbaer:
Police and the Pope begin with P on both. An equally perverse Comparison. The Gema informs its members with an open Annual Report, from which all the figures are accurate picture. It is one of the most effective companies, since they percentage with a lot less money for the government as auskomt eg health insurance companies, or banks. Finally Gema not deserve the money, but it manages on behalf of artists. There may be something they like to consume themselves, as long as there is as little as before.
What are the occurrence, I can not say. I have always received friendly information, synonymous when I had questions, which with my membership had nothing to do. I think not synonymous, that when the Gema s.meiner phone sees that I am a member.
The GEZ is sort of fundamentally different to Gema that there is only this one offers Comparison: They both start with G at. In Eggerder "are synonymous, incidentally two grams, can I assume that you have for the GEZ and Gema for work?
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Hello
GEMA and GEZ start with G at both. I do not think the two organizations to ensure the protection of their members goes. One wants to secure its own existence. With those who had to do should they occur over time to reflect. Of course, this is my subjective opinion.
mfG Eggerder
LOL .... The smartest contribution since the invention of the wheel. Beer, the Bundestag, Bambi, Blöd, Banal, Berlin and gifted, everything starts with "B" at. Following your logic is then synonymous Bumsen already so stupid because Bavaria synonymous with "B" begins ... I think that is too high for me.
One should Aufnahmetests in forums and make at least the basic intelligence of a bag of chips require to become a member.
Good night;)
MB
Reply Pianist:
If that's you really need is so mistaken You have relations with Gema.
For cuckoo again - but it's absolutely not about what has relations with Gema and especially those relationships have no influence on the distribution. The results only and solely on the distribution plan, and the will of the General Assembly decided by the Board and then implemented.
The annual reports of Gema are also public, so everyone can picture them, as much has been captured there and how much of it again s.die members will be distributed. And that is a value of above 85 percent.
People like Klaus Doldinger and Stefan Waggershausen therefore do not receive such high dividends because they are on the supervisory board of Gema sit, but because their music so much is used.
If someone is so little payout is that hardly covered his membership fee, then this happens for the reason that his music is hardly used anywhere, but the others here have already mentioned.
I'm saying: The Gema is a prime example of how a professional group of mostly weak individual fighters in order to safeguard their rights together and has thus in a better position brings, because these people just share their legal rights much more effectively.
Matthias
Reply Pianist:
Sorry for the novel, but this measure many filmmakers with a different scale for filmmakers than for musicians.
That surprises me always synonymous. We, as movie people are synonymous but the author, but often seem a disturbed relationship to the other authors to have their music in our films, we integrate it and even only a complete work to appear.
I will always be synonymous breakfast high, when a great authority in a tender film asks that Royalty Music is to be used. Then I will discuss with those until they realize that they're totally on the wrong are. That would be about as if in a tender is that you can only employ people who are in union None ...
Matthias
Reply DWUA:
@ Melbert
Did you audition times reasonably?
Under the above mentioned links can be found sowas:
www.digitaljuice.com/products/products.asp?pid=331 # tabs
(Schmerzensgeld unfortunately there's not)
;))
Something sounds better as this one:
www.highland-musikarchiv.com/anspieler/S-100100.mp3
But what it cost:
www.highland-musikarchiv.com/freigabe.htm
A lot Anekdötchen (both positive and negative experiences
with GEMA) in the field of electronic music would have to tell;
Although it would be too much OT.
Therefore, should suffice to note that the core of the statements
of a pianist, MB, tillbaer is nothing to add.
@ Gysenberg
Sure, because you have to pay as a producer.
But the liable, not you!
:)
Reply Melbert:
Well, really great, I found the highland music not synonymous ... I myself have Music of Raven Studio http://www.gemafreie-musik.de/index1.html
I know not synonymous soo tingly ...
Is it a rumor that the Mixed Media Music Tapes of Mercedes-Benz may use as it looks with bands who are not in the Gema, but make good music?
Mel
Reply tillbaer:
@ Mel:
Perhaps you should inform yourself first, whom the Gema about what rights and represent you for the use of music must obtain.
Reply Ficeduld:
People, what have you for a taste? That's all terrible. What should the film be something where you can use? Such things can really be any movie foul.
I'm saying: There are no usable Royalty Music.
Matthias
I stick to it, except from Hollywood film comes not usable
Reply akira23:
An interesting and extensive sound range can be found here:
Reply MrMoneypenny:
Synonymous irgendwovon composers must live, but they have very many years a powerful accounting organization, and this should be welcome.
Matthias
From the powerful billing organization live mainly the powerful payroll organization itself and the heirs of the composers who have less than 70 years died. Today living composers feel rarely represented.
+1
GEMA is cash distribution of bottom to top, so unequal and unjust composers of different genres will be addressed.
Payroll sheets by mail to 1 x per year, a bow, the musicians do not understand or will understand.
Pop music takes 1 / 100 of symphonic music, no joke.
Reply Pianist:
Pop music takes 1 / 100 of symphonic music, no joke.
It is true that works of different genres differently evaluated. The hat was in solidarity with the distribution system. Whether your hundredth now just a flat-rate correct, I only have to check. But even if it were: This is the pop song but synonymous 100.000 times played as often as the symphonic work. Still remains a significant advantage for the pop song.
I give you another example: At some point, the majority of composers complaining that all the many jingles and signature tunes, the day on television is heard, the composer unjustifiably bring much dividend. Then, the members decided that works daily at a fixed time to listen, so typical signature tunes only one tenth to be distributed.
Meant as a criticism of your statement is exactly the other way, therefore, to understand: The Gema attempted to greater equity between members, so for example synonymous a composer of classical works can pay his rent.
Matthias
Reply MrMoneypenny:
It is true that we used with pop music was able to earn more. Today, most (95%) used pop songs rarely played on the radio.
It is true that the live-GEMA fees has increased (eg, to EUR 300 per gig). Hardly any club can afford, let alone the artist, his own songs and wants to present itself as a contractual reasons organizer occurs, so that he gets the gig.
THIS IS NO EXCEPTION, THIS IS UNFORTUNATELY VERY OFTEN PRACTICE.
Who gets the higher dividends? The authors of the 95% pop songs that are hardly played or the authorship of classical music, which just played, but by up to 100-fold of the assessed GEMA?
Will time that GEMA gets competition from foreign collecting societies, thereby more transparency (opaque slips GEMA) and an alternative to pop musicians, who clearly represents their interests.
Reply robbitobbi:
Suggest me for 4 months with GEMA rum.
A requested (SmartSound) Title search will be classified as gemapflichtig. I ask that this be examined again. Upon request in the USA (ASCAP) states that the documentation of agency: "It looks but after Music from Royalty." I will refer s.einen "expert" then the following wording:
"There is music, the composer whose mechanical right collecting society is a member and then in Germany by GEMA would be. Because of the rights assignment in the U.S., Germany (sub-) publishers are usually calm."
Did the title now logged in 4 weeks, and yesterday my phone (because it gave no feedback) to the state of things inquired. Yesterday so the info: "The search in the database has revealed that the title is gemapflichtig."
What remains today is a rise in blood pressure, sinister eyes flicker and an irrepressible urge my hands to use as a vise.
Here is a link tip.
Since I come from the graphics, and like always Still Image offers of iStock zurüchgreife, I was very surprised that iStock since a few days now synonymous audio tracks offers. Lt. Lizensbestimmungen Royalty.
http://deutsch.istockphoto.com/index.php?view=full
.
Reply kili:
jamendo.com
creative commons music.
Fortunately, it is not that high quality music always have to be settled gema. there are enough good bands, their music under creative commons bill ...
is similar to software. there is great software (like Blender) that are freely available.
Reply VidUser:
How does it because Youtupe, Vimeo and Co.? Even here in the forum to present their people (private) works on those platforms. And I can not really think of the musical accompaniment of some footage is always accompanied with music Royalty.
| |
