Sports encode / poor quality

///

Sportaufnahmen encoden / schlechte Qualität

Sports encode / poor quality

Question of Holgi2007:

Oktober 2007

Hi Everybody

I started as a rookie a problem with encoding of sports:
When recording of fast motion sequences, the coming of a SonyDCR record despite noise due to low light (tripod exist ..) for the purpose quite satisfactorily. I then with video deluxe 2007/2008 Magic DVDs burned and had even at maximum quality setting (CBR 8000 KB, quality factor 15 (of 15) from jedemal flicker filter s.oder a huge problem: The encoder generates each of the fast-moving athletes a sort Schattenumriß . Thus, the recordings on DVD for the intended purpose (movement analysis) completely unusable.
Is there a possibility to avoid Magix or another (easy and fast to use) program that can do that better? The important thing is that it is easy to use, because I had no time for 10 minutes of video 3x per week hours before zuzubringen PC, unfortunately, must go quickly, within a short time do I need the DVD, without SCHNICK-Schnack.

Thank you for tips!

Reply Mylenium:

"Holgi2007" wrote:

This are the recordings to DVD for the intended purpose (movement analysis) completely unusable.

Na for the purpose of DVD in general is likely the wrong choice ... The blocks do not have any optical flow analysis from the course. Your "Schattenumriß" are probably just disturbances in the P-frames because the Bewegunsdifferenz between the frames are too large and then the signal is easily refilled. This can only be done by tinkering s.den matrices of transcoder or multi-pass VBR really get to grips with.

Anyway, for your purposes, you should consider what hardware, eg 'ne Canopus card, MPEG-II (I-Frame only) native captured and then converting to MPEG-II DVD in real time creates multiple. Then just the M2V in Encore or Nero and import ferdich ... Otherwise, I see relatively little as possible, because good MPEG-II and great hurry to conclude (at least in low-end) somehow mutually exclusive, and software solutions as well bring no improvement.

Mylenium

Reply thos-berlin:

I wonder, as always when I hear of shadows, not whether the final product has been viewed s.PC us and the "interlaced problem" strikes again.

So: Do you have the video on your television viewing?

Reply Mylenium:

"thos-berlin" wrote:

I wonder, as always when I hear of shadows, not whether the final product has been viewed s.PC us and the "interlaced problem" strikes again.

So: Do you have the video on your television viewing?

Could of course be synonymous ... , O)

Mylenium

Reply Holgi2007:

"Mylenium" wrote:

"thos-berlin" wrote:

I wonder, as always when I hear of shadows, not whether the final product has been viewed s.PC us and the "interlaced problem" strikes again.

So: Do you have the video on your television viewing?

Could of course be synonymous ... , O)

Mylenium

Jepsen, obviously I'm exactly in the case reingegangen:
I burn the CD and which is exclusively viewed on the PC, when I encode progressive Magix leave, the shadow seems to me to be away. I try another bissl rum.

Danke schon mal for the tips!

Answers to Similar Questions:

Adobe Premiere Smart Encode

AVCHD video trimming without re-encode on Mac OS 10.6?

more topics:
Special Topics

AVI
Adobe Encore DVD
Adobe Premiere Pro
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
DVD / Blu-ray Disc
ENG
Editing
Effect
Effects
Encore
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formats
HDV
Help
Image
JVC
Lighting
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Premiere
Question
Recording
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Time
Video
Video Editing

slashCAM

News
HD Camcorder database
One-on-One Cam comparison
About our tests
About us

update am 29.April 2013 - 18:00
slashCAM ist ein Projekt der channelunit GmbH
*Datenschutzhinweis*