| Use of optical image stabilization for VX2100
Question of Kornhaas:
Mai 2009
Hello,
There is practical experience in film with a very good tripod (; eg Manfrotto 503/525), Focal s.welcher the use of the optical image stabilization is necessary and when not.
How much s.Qualitaet money on camera standing by the use of the optical image stabilizer?
Gruss
roko
Reply Bernd E.:
Experience with ... ... .. ... s.welcher Focal tripod, the use of the optical image stabilization is necessary, and if not ...
That will depend strongly on how fast your subject is moving and how strong you nachführst the camera there. Normally it takes s.besten if the stabilizer of a tripod is simply switched off.
... how much s.Qualitaet money on camera standing by the use of the optical image stabilizer? ...
An optical stabilizer s.sich not affect the image quality, but in this case, however, an unsightly side effect: If the camera is fixed on a tripod, namely, it can happen that the stabilizer attempt to compensate for a movement that is not there -- And just so he brings a small but disturbing movement into the picture. Therefore, the Recommendation synonymous him off on such recordings.
Reply tommyb:
When the camera is fixed on a tripod, it can happen that tried the stabilizer to compensate for a movement that is not there
But this applies only to electronic image stabilizers, for analyzing the motion vectors in the Picture.
An optical image stabilization compensates the other hand, the movements of the camera with the sensors are measured. For long focal lengths, it can even make sense to switch off is always advised, however, because on a tripod, it should not wobble, yes.
Thus, the picture remains as calm as possible, it is advisable to have a tripod with a large, heavy head.
Reply Kornhaas:
Thanks for the quick reply.
Specifically, to make recordings of plays, sometimes up to 5 meters away s.rechten edge of the stage and then with wide-angle converter (, 0.7 x), sometimes behind the last row of seats and 20 meters off of the stage. Lighting is rather sparse at both locations.
Thanks and greeting
roko
Reply Bernd E.:
... But this applies only to electronic image stabilizers ...
Of course, true! I probably write better again until what if's out there is no longer so hot ;-)
... Photographs of theatrical lighting ... ... ... rather sparse
In this case, I would not use the stabilizer (; have to avoid the risk of tightening in pans), but because its effect is immediately seen in the viewfinder, you can do it easily even before the filming time to test.
Reply WideScreen:
Synonymous Remember that the image stabilization produces the pan strange effects, since he wants to ruhighalten the Picture erstmal. So Toggle.
Reply Meggs:
But this applies only to electronic image stabilizers, for analyzing the motion vectors in the Picture.
Not true. My XM2 has an optical stabilizer. To me it has already happened when the camera long stood on the tripod that the sudden jerky picture, although there was no shock. However Passiert rare. Since I turn off the stabilizer when using a tripod, it happens no more.
Reply tommyb:
Then the stabilizer of your XM2 will probably work synonymous electronical. A completely skip the camera on a tripod stands and optical stabilizer has a really should not wobble.
Maybe yes vorbeigetrampelt someone?
Reply Meggs:
The stabilizer of the XM2 is definitely optical. As the bobble effect arises technically accurate, I do not know. I've read on several occasions this effect especially in times of optical stabilizer. He is with me appeared a total of only 2 times, after about 1 hours to film from Tripod. Vorbeigetrammpelt is no one there was a horizontal herwackeln pretty strong out-and.
| |
