Frage von KrischanDO:
Hello,
Forum search without results, search on Vimeo synonymous, yet no response from Vimeo support, therefore I am asking this out:
Did Vimeo synonymous as a lump-Deal with the GEMA, as it has Youtube?
Or do I have if I have a small test video with derEX-1 at Vimeo RESTRICT, with Music of the Amsterdam Klezmer eg tape, GEMA so happy?
Regards
Christian
Antwort von Axel:
Since 90% of Vimeo clips with background music are 99% of the "repertoire" music is, I assume that this is so massive rights violations committed, that a bill scatterer occurs as a ghost rider in a traffic jam. As synonymous here in many threads to read, protects the individual but not from prosecution.
The sympathetic nature of Vimeo to deal with it, is the obligatory reference to "guidelines" that abuse must be reported, especially in several areas as formulated self-understanding: "Vimeo exists to provide you with a space to showcase your
creativity and share your life. As such, we do not allow you to upload videos that you did not make yourself. "
For musicians certainly angry that their creative output is so poorly protected. I think a video that is a strange painting "needs" can not even suck a lot. The maker itself discredited Do the Right Thing!
Antwort von KrischanDO:
I think a video that is a strange painting "needs" can not even suck a lot. The maker itself discredited Do the Right Thing! It reads so, as would a good video without live music.
Or as if the video maker synonymous nor the music itself should be aware of.
The stop-motion video, that I with my school interns have gebastelt (A stack of dishes in the dishwasher moves), would not totlangweiling without music, but with music it is nice. That nothing short film for the next few days, it is clear to me already.
Or do you mean the garnicht so purist?
Regards
Christian
Antwort von Axel:
Imagine you seist himself a musician, and a piece on which you're proud of, is emerging of a lively accompaniment to the dishes on the network. Maybe you like the way your music is used. Almost certainly you do not suffer financial losses. But s.der fact that you were not asked, that nothing will change. With purism has nothing to do, not even at all with Gema. The legal page is an aspect of respect for a non-creative power is another. Many movies have a nice musical accompaniment. Most movies are bad, but still have foreign music. The one who should decide whether the use is appropriate, is m. E. of authorship. Or you can see the different synonymous? Obviously.
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Hi,
I've been on the management of the Amsterdam Klezmer tape contact with the label up and am curious.
Since I synonymous photos on photo agencies sell, I am accustomed to it that photos (okay, rarely what, to which I am incredibly proud) may be used elsewhere. I think a musician who has the respect of his rights to use the GEMA has, synonymous to live with can (or must) that his music s.Orten or used in contexts that do not like him.
The movie is expected to underpin my image no harm to the musicians mean synonymous if not I will get for this price.
Let's see what the Amsterdam Klezmer tape which holds ...
Regards
Christian
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Apparently it seems that the magic s.sich GEMA anything to have. After these four letters may no longer read or even think. So once again for everyone:
GEMA-free does not mean rights-free! This alleged freedom of GEMA some video portals means
only that the GEMA flat rate fee for the publishing unit and receives the uploader question (and
just about!) No need to worry.
Whether the rights holder s.dem piece (ie, usually the record label) of into a more or less ghoulish Videoclip agrees, is
not to say! This approval would be
extra to be (and is nearly 100% of the clips being shown there with security not issued).
BG, Andreas
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Hello Andreas,
GEMA clearly has something magical. From where do you get such great information zBsTelefon like "at your private birthday celebration for you need the Music GEMA fees. Besides there are all cousins." When asked what the "used" to be understood, how many generations back were, was just "I do not synonymous." But "s.ungefähr 40 people" must be paid. What "about 40" were synonymous was not conclusively answered.
Since it is not surprising that the simple people of strange feelings about the GEMA developed.
On the subject back:
Meanwhile, I have an email from the record label. My Clip like them, they would like to use on their website synonymous and have nothing to publish on my part.
There's stuff ...
Regards
Christian
Antwort von petsch:
Apparently it seems that the magic s.sich GEMA anything to have. After these four letters may no longer read or even think. So once again for everyone:
GEMA-free does not mean rights-free!
This alleged freedom of GEMA some video portals means only that the GEMA flat rate fee for the publishing unit and receives the uploader question (and just about!) No need to worry.
Whether the rights holder s.dem piece (ie, usually the record label) of into a more or less ghoulish Videoclip agrees, is not to say! This approval would be extra to be (and is nearly 100% of the clips being shown there with security not issued).
BG, Andreas 100% correct! Most films go through the synchronization license, which means the license a song for a film to use.
but have ne coole seite discovered: www.filmersclub.de great music archive, music songs sound pretty good, tweak it you can download music (and of course gets the license synchronization). So if downloading music because you can be video in youtube so safely and are purely None can give you something! I can only recommend.
Antwort von beiti:
The people who complain about, for an event s.die Money GEMA to pay, have no idea how hard that for (law abiding) Filmmakers is. Most film makers would be glad if they just use some Music and Money for GEMA s.die transfer could. Because the collection of law, the music in the film to use, in most cases considerably more difficult and more expensive than the GEMA settlement.
Nevertheless, is frightening how careless with user rights on the network is handled. In Still Image-forums, there are more and more demands, such as a legally effective copyright notice really did, apparently prevailing view, images on the Internet without an explicit indication that auto freeware. YouTube & Co. contributed so synonymous not just to improve the situation, it would be the duty of YouTube, unsuspecting amateur users pointed out that the big advertised GEMA contract not to use the auto music allowed.
Recently someone stated in e-book portal XinXii several volumes of "Harry Potter" one and wanted s.Download each earn a few Euros. Is this sheer effrontery, incredible ignorance or simply boundless stupidity?
