| Wide Angle Converter for bigger picture?
Question of Joey_Moose:
Juli 2007
Hello together: you may forgive me the question, it is probably most people here to bring smile ...
Following concerns: I have recently completed a NV-GS320 acquired on the date I can not complain. However, I had to find that the picture is relatively small, particularly by the 16:9 format. So for a shot very far away to the desired object, especially for interior shots is difficult.
Is it by a wide-angle attachment enlarge this picture, ie at the same distance on the image to - particularly the top and bottom? If this car then distorted picture? And what makes regarding the distance from? How much can I Angle0 with Wide, 5x ran closer if I want the same picture?
Vorneweg: I would not be too much to spend and would at the moment to 0.5 x Kenko (SGW-05Hi) tend to the man for about 35 euros erstehen can. Sure, a lot I did not expect, but more, I would not actually spend.
What "mess" should I expect?
Reply PeterM:
Basically, it is difficult and therefore synonymous good Weitwinkelvorsätzte expensive to construct.
From an intent to approve 0.5, I would advise against. In addition to the geometric distortion, which is necessary, nor correct s.Computer are the lack of sharpness and color in the Randbreichen a big problem.
My tip a little more money and in all cases is 0.7 with an intent satisfied.
Reply Joey_Moose:
See a wide-angle attachment more than gadget for recordings in which the claim s.eine high quality always lower, for example, shooting at parties, in the car on trips, etc.
Because I find it meaningful that "more" instead looks with high quality is just half the picture in the header to have: o)
Times I'm going assume that such an essay synonymous rather quickly and can break down again. For beautiful pictures in the telecommunications field, he then comes down.
Is there a formula, with the man to gain the screen out, or is it even a factor in the wide angle?
Reply wasy2:
See a wide-angle attachment more than gadget for recordings in which the claim s.eine high quality always lower, for example, shooting at parties, in the car on trips, etc.
Because I find it meaningful that "more" instead looks with high quality is just half the picture in the header to have: o)
Times I'm going assume that such an essay synonymous rather quickly and can break down again. For beautiful pictures in the telecommunications field, he then comes down.
Is there a formula, with the man to gain the screen out, or is it even a factor in the wide angle?
if you have a weitwinkel intent with factor 0.5, then your focal length is halved. the smaller the focal length, the greater the extracts.
at half the focal length you can say that you are about 50% more picture in your viewfinder reinbekommst, so the left and right about 25%
with a factor 0.7 with it's right and left about 15% more, etc..
but you must be careful that your factor is not too small. because the smaller the factor, the more synonymous your image distorted.
should mean that you are in bad weitwinkelvorsätzen a fish-eye effect and get the image s.den sites glubschig, as will be rounded down.
Although there are special lenses, with the intention, which then are called synonymous fish-eye and is also sometimes used for effects, but in your case is rather not the case
Reply Meggs:
However .... I had to find that the picture is relatively small, particularly by the 16:9 format. ....
... Can you through a wide-angle attachment enlarge this picture, ie at the same distance on the image to - particularly the top and bottom? If this car then distorted picture? ....
Can the GS 320 is not 4:3? If you are above and below what is missing but would possibly solve your problem.
Reply Joey_Moose:
Yes, the GS320 is synonymous 4:3 format and the image is magnified even a little synonymous in the Height. But still need to be a fairly large bay. In addition, the 16:9 format meaningful (corresponding to my Television) - and the format switch permanently, I would not actually synonymous.
Incidentally, I was already surprised that when you switch to 4:3 actually magnified image of the vertical - ie, the chip but that the "normal operation" in 16:9 is not optimal and Pixel ausgenutz will be wasted. Thought the camera with "true 16:9" as advertised would be optimized chips and only 4:3 would cut ...
Bie Ebay a wide HAMA "37 HTMC HR 0,5 X digital" offered - because someone has experience? The part will cost about 100 Euro MSRP was often offered by the dealer and went 15-30 for the euro over the table. What do you - a Fake?
Reply Joey_Moose:
Experience with Kenko wideangle
Mitllerweile I am the owner of a 0.5 "SGW-05Hi" Wide essay of Kenko. The initial trouble with the thread, only with much patience and some risk to the 37mm of my GS320 camcorder recording could be screwed, is now dissipated. I wanted the tower no longer have to miss him and constantly in use. You get much more simple "more thing" to the Picture - that is naturally the quality suffers and the camcorder is a bit unwieldy, but the bitter aftertaste.
For me to understand why Panasonic and probably most others as a modest Wide Anglemitbringen. During the next camcorder purchase will be for me an important sales argument for free!
Reply Hänschen 255:
Hi from Kiel.
The Kenko is SGW05HI top. I'm also excited.
0.5 x is simply perfect for interior spaces.
Johnny
| |
