principles I have a problem, with whom I have long been fighting and that now in my new film, a film very much wedding day to be found: namely, the building tremble especially with movements!
I cut my videos are still with Adobe Premiere 6.5 (pinnacle pro one), then I for authoring a dvd pinnacle mpeg2 will output and with adobe encore 2.0 edit.
finished and burned in various players abgespespeilt are the movements in the film strongly jerky. is perhaps the most used data s.der? The video has soeine max. data rate of 8 Mbit / s, the ton max. 1.5 Mbit / s (pcm) (that is actually still under the dvd standard of 9.8.) could be the problem by reducing the data rate be fixed? bittte for your help ... maybe yes at times you have such a problem appeared!
many many thanks! mfg alex
[/ b]
Antwort von thekloi:
Your Fields disagree. Either they are confused or you have them because you somehow wegrechnen the export settings wrong amchst. The data is synonymous problematic. 8Mbit is hirnrissig. Even good commercial DVDs "with a lot of air" is barely over 6 Mbit. synonymous, of course, another rethink. Could be that performing players are otherwise overwhelmed.
Mylenium
Antwort von alex 1984:
many thanks for the quick response!
what do you mean with fields ???????
thanks veil lg alex
Antwort von alex 1984:
another question:
what data would be optimal for deinermeinung after medium or max. Data?
medium and max. Data at 6?, or medium to maximum 6 and higher?
Thank you for your reply!
Antwort von Markus:
"Mylenium" wrote:
8Mbit is hirnrissig. [...] Could be that performing players are otherwise overwhelmed.
* sign * Better to stay with the overall data rate (audio and video together) at 8 Mbit / s.
"alex 1984" wrote:
what do you mean with fields ???????
Field = Field. Perhaps the true Halbbildfolge not.
"alex 1984" wrote:
what data would be optimal for deinermeinung after medium or max. Data?
The lump sum can not say, because the result is not only used by the encoder, but synonymous depending on material. What data still provide useful results, one finds s.besten with a small test set out. This compressed a brief but critical video sequence with different data rates and burn them in succession on the same DVD (critical = lots of details and plenty of exercise). Then you can give the individual sequences s.Television compare and look for specific artifacts.
One thing you will be the same as first noticed the increase in the data provides some advantage when no longer visible.
For more info you can find in the following discussion:
Antwort von alex 1984:
Hello thanks for the info!
but I'm currently already completed!
been trying since about 7 days, about 80 min film on dvd to get stupid. with adobe encore 2 with auwämdigen transitions and menus.
the two movies, one 10 min and the other 70, I have the pinnacle with one section per card with adobe premiere 6.5 cut and with the pinnacle mpeg2 codec compresses and then imported into encore. therefore nothing more needs encore transcode.
my big problem (synonymous to 6 mbit / s data rate bild + 0.2 mbit / s ton): Strong quake in building movements. Therefore my question: could it be that the mpeg2 codec pibnnacle of truth is to blame and encore with this rather older codec not cope. it would be much better light, the films in encore as a pinnacle avi file to import, and then using this in an encore to convert MPEG 2?
ask for your help, I'm completely ratlods and s.ende my knowledge .....
many many thanks!
achja: because of the fields: I have always set to field first, otherwise nothing Gints yes cease?
lg alex
Antwort von Markus:
"alex 1984" wrote:
achja: because of the fields: I have always set to field first, otherwise nothing Gints yes cease?
Why do not you try just with a different setting? Otherwise they can not exclude errors.
Antwort von Markus:
Then again one can not wait. Here, the discussion next (!):
