She has recorded 16:9, then imported into iMovie (in the 16:9 format) and then processed as they are on a MiniDV dubbed, was at once to 4:3. Where is the problem? And how can the 16:9 format beibehlaten?
've Heard that Dv is basically 4:3.
Thanks for the quick reply
Best regards
Marc
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"Medienfalle0028" wrote:
've Heard that Dv is basically 4:3.
DV can be 4:3 to 16:9 as synonymous, HDV, however, is always 16:9.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von WoWu:
DV governs the so-called "blue book" and is only specified for 4:3. Some companies actually stretch but the square pixels in specified rectangular pixels and achieve a 16:9 Effect, in which, however, vertical resolution is lost. (Anamorphic resolution) Also HDV2 is actually a 4:3 format from the MPEG specification with H14 and originally specified 1440x1152. (Constructed: 1440 / 4 * 3 = 1080) Only through the "trick" the distortion of the rectangular pixels, the sensors Resolutionveränder.Leider but not these rectangular pixels.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
"Medienfalle0028" wrote:
(...) And when they have a MiniDV dubbed, was at once resulting 4:3 (...)
Is there 4:3 on the DVD or is "only" to the Television doof? I have here today a 4:3 SVCD created in my LCD, it is 16:9 dar. same me recently with a DVD purchase happens (4:3 displayed: 16:9). Maybe not 100% clean set the burning program? BG Andreas
Antwort von WoWu:
that comes on a few things ... whether the FS Häder generally only reads or takes his preferences. He reads the header from the program flows, they must of course along with the authoring of the content set. 4:3 So when I work with square pixels and 16:9 if I am with artificially drawn rectangular work content. In between is then synonymous nor any other combination of possible ... 4:3 rectangle and naturally leads to long necks, etc. It is so distant from the difficult to say what it is ...
