or - that is the question!

wrote

> When someone finally knows the standard for DVD's is fixed?

Is it already:

Standard 1: DVD-R
Standard 2: DVD R

Everything clear?

--
Gruß, Rainer Ostmann

Please only reply in the NG. My mail here
Address rarely do I get from. If you look to be:
RpunktOstmannBindestrichDetmoldatgmxpunktnet ;-)





Reply Michael Spahr:


"Rainer Ostmann" wrote in news post
Re: + or -, that is the question! # # #
>
> "Michael Spahr" wrote
>
>> When someone finally knows the standard for DVD's is fixed?
>
> Is it already:
>
> Standard 1: DVD-R
> Standard 2: DVD R
>
> Got it?
>
Huh, I thought either / or.
Is it basically nonsensical maintain both!






Reply Gerhard Kolbe:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 17:38:050200, "Michael Spahr"
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> when someone finally knows the standard for DVD's is fixed?
>

Good question!

Although the group with nothing to do, but my point of view, a
similar question: ;-)

New Car

Gasoline?
Diesel?

Gerhard

--

Please only reply in the group. The email address is valid,
But questions and answers may be because of spam flooding overlooked
will. Otherwise http://www.gerhard-kolbe.de




Reply Lars Mueller:

Gerhard Kolbe wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2004 17:38:050200, "Michael Spahr"
> wrote:

>> When someone finally knows the standard for DVD's is fixed?

> Did Although the group with nothing to do, but my point of view, a
> Similar question: ;-)
>
> New Car
>
> Gasoline?
> Diesel?

Is it just ontopic, as the other question. :-) Somehow, I have
feel that the diesel price is the price of oil more and more
approaches.

Gruß Lars




Reply Marcus Doering:

"Michael Spahr" wrote in news post
+ Or -, that is the question! # # #
> Hello,
>
> When someone finally knows the standard for DVD's is fixed?
>
> Gruß Michael

The standard had been established: DVD-R/RW!

Just thought Philips and Ricoh, they urgently need a second variant
invent (DVD R / RW) to the license fees are not paid to the consortium to
must, therefore, there are now 2 versions, of which the pro version NOT
the official of the DVD consortium.

Basically, this is absolutely no preference because both varieties in the DVD-recorded
Condition as a standard DVD purchased behave. The difference
exists only in the write strategy. What comes out the back is always a
DVD that plays everywhere (at least the R-variants, in RW looks bleak
off).

A similar theater, there were already in the DVD-Audio. SONY has once again
cook his own soup and SACD invent. Unfortunately, these
Systems are not compatible, leading to None buy the stuff.

Gruss
Marcus






Reply Winfried Wolf:


"Marcus Doering" wrote

> The standard has already been set: DVD-R/RW!
>
> Only, Philips, and Ricoh said it urgently needed a second variant
> Invent (DVD R / RW) to the license fees are not paid to the consortium
to
> Must


How do you know?
Incidentally cost-Cons unlock code for the new BenQ drives grad
times 50 cents (VAT) and I can not really synonymous recognize that the
now numerous available / burners have become much more expensive than
einformatigen their predecessors.

Gruß,
WIWO.






Reply Lars Mueller:

Winfried Wolf wrote:

> Incidentally cost-Cons unlock code for the new BenQ drives grad
> Times 50 cents (VAT) and I can not really synonymous recognize that the
...

The entire discussion is already hyperactive fluid, since almost every
Brenner writes both formats.

Xpost F'up2 suitable group.

Gruß Lars




Reply Lutz Bojasch:

Michael Spahr wrote:

> Huh, I thought either / or.
> Is it basically nonsensical maintain both!

Welcome to reality!
It's not a question of industrial customer satisfaction and clear
Conditions to create it's only about profit maximization.
That is why many prefer to cook their own soup. Why did you
well then in that, of all technically Videoaufzeichnunggssystemen
zweitschlechteste and the superior Betamax or more
less to die? For the customer that was not a good solution for
The industry is already the VHS machines are much more "simple crocheted"
and above all the license fees were lower than in Betamax.
Wait a little, it is already waiting for the other format
Silver in the starting blocks. Soon there and then - still synonymous
each as double-sided, blue-ray and god knows what else.
Gruß Lutz





Reply Carla Schneider:

Marcus Doering wrote:
>
> "Michael Spahr" wrote in news post
> + Or -, that is the question! # # #
>> Hello,
>>
>> When someone finally knows the standard for DVD's is fixed?
>>
>> Gruß Michael
>
> The standard has already been set: DVD-R/RW!
>
> Only, Philips, and Ricoh said it urgently needed a second variant
> Invent (DVD R / RW) to the license fees are not paid to the consortium to
> Need, so there are now 2 versions, of which the pro version NOT
> The official of the DVD consortium.

R is a technical progress synonymous gegenueber-R. It allows the
Burner after a break exactly at the center continue
was stopped at the. When-R is the only loss with something like
CD-R. Basically a long-R should be dead, because technically obsolete
and not cheaper, but market power still keeps it alive.
Both formats are used in the next 5-10 years anyway extinct because
DVD R s with higher capacity (blue ray, etc.) they will displace.

>
> Basically, this is absolutely no preference because both varieties in the DVD-recorded
> State as a normal DVD purchased behave. The difference
> Only in the write strategy. What comes out the back is always a
> DVD that plays everywhere (at least the R-variants, in RW looks bleak
> From).

Exactly. Much worse is that some DVD-R PlayerR and although you can read,
but problems with the recorded format. Either they give
the interlaced video DVDs is not correct, or they remain
shall depend on where 2 MPEG files to a VOB has been processed
are neighbors, etc.


--
http://www.geocities.com/carla_sch/index.html




Reply Alexander Noe':

Carla Schneider wrote:


> R is a technical progress synonymous gegenueber-R. It allows the
> Burner after a break exactly at the center continue
> On the left was.
> In-R, the only loss with something like CD-R.

What do you mean with loss? For CD-Rs are the LÃ ¼ cken so small
daÃ
x a player who dara ¼ ber stumbles, as defective characteristics.

Ã
Sbrigens DVD-RW has been in a defect management
¤ eligible functional state, whereas, according to Philips C'T 10/04
the development of DVD MRW (which defect management with
should include) has put on hold ...


mfg
Alexander




Reply Bodo Malo:

>
> New Car
>
> Gasoline?
> Diesel?
>

Wrong
Wrong

Hybrid Car






Reply Bodo Malo:

Certainly not what this is nonsense:

http://www.mediamarkt.de/produktwelten/dvd-rekorder/dvd-formate/

The DVD standard.
DVD RW has the greatest chance to be a standard for DVD recording enforce. The fact that companies like Dell, HP,
Memorex, Mitsubishi, Philips, Yamaha Sonyund on the format DVD RW / R set suggests that the acquisition of a
the burner is no misjudgment.

With Microsoft, the DVD-RW Alliance company above another Giants brought into the boat. The software manufacturer announced that
this standard will be supported.

However, the struggle to raise standards in the second round, because at the moment, two new formats developed in parallel: The
DVD successor "Advanced Optical Disc" and its rival "Blu-ray."






Reply Jochen Kremer:

Bodo Malo wrote:

>> New Car
>>
>> Gasoline?
>> Diesel?
>>
>
>
> False
> False
>
> Hybrid Car
>
>
Hybrid car is dual-standard burner

supa. wär but boring with just one standard.

Jo "NEC-1300A" chen




Reply Alexander Noe':

Bodo Malo wrote:

> Microsoft has the DVD-RW Alliance company above another
> Giants brought into the boat. The Software Manufacturer kà ¼ ndigte to
> The standard of future kà ¼ ¼ to Assisted tzen.

If this works as good as M $ s trying to burn CDs,
then SpaÃ
x so much ...


mfg
Alexander




Reply Ralf Fontana:

Marcus Doering wrote:

> The standard has already been set: DVD-R/RW!

sik!

> Basically, this is absolutely no preference because both varieties in the DVD-recorded
> State as a normal DVD purchased behave. The difference
> only in the write strategy. What comes out the back is always a
> DVD that plays everywhere (at least the R-variants, in RW looks bleak
> from).

Quad eros demonstrandum (or something similar)

Kennwood DVF-3530

DVD-R - Nothing
DVD-R - Nothing
DVD-RW - Nothing
DVD RW - he plays

So practice test ever spoke against it, which is the R-variants
as a DVD can play anywhere.

There remains the theory. The others clearly speaks of
Reflection behavior, it is based on a pressed DVD
catastrophically low-light laser diode of an R-variant
when Emfänger to. But hardly any of the current half
Players from the text is, if the customer otherwise elsewhere
purchase would come to reflect Sonyund Co.



--
We know that "extreme" is not part of the name but Nvidia wants
have to use something to distinguish this super extremely
expensive cards from its normal just extremely expensive ultra -
cards. (The Inquirer for Geforce Ultra Extreme)




Reply Detlef Wirsing:

Ralf wrote on 27 Fontana May:

> Quad demonstrandum eros (or something similar)

QED.

For the initiated:
Quod erit demonstrandum.
:-)

Yours sincerely,
Detlef Wirsing





Reply Marcus Doering:

> How do you know?

Because I'm in this business and earn my money with the production of
CDs and DVDs busy synonymous and therefore the emergence of
Media formats must follow.

> Incidentally cost-Cons unlock code for the new BenQ drives grad
> times 50 cents (VAT) and I can not really synonymous recognize that the
> nzwischen numerous available / burners have become much more expensive than
> einformatigen its predecessor.

So Lizzie Muller is Big Business before. It is not a
Burner and a blank, but a million!

Regards
Marcus






Reply Bodo G. Meier:

On 28.05.2004 00:38 wrote Detlef Wirsing:
> Ralf wrote on 27 Fontana May:
>
>> Quad demonstrandum eros (or something similar)
>
> QED.
>
> For the initiated:
> Quod erit demonstrandum.
> :-)

Romani eunt domus!
(For the even inaugurated ... ;-)))

Salve,
Bodo
--
Bodo G. Meier * dr. rer. nat. Trondheim, Norway * *
URL: http://home.c2i.net/bmeier




Reply Lutz Bojasch:

Bodo G. Meier wrote:

> Romani eunt domus!
> (For the even inaugurated ... ;-)))

Jewelcase alea est

(and now it's in the anus)