Frage von berndi:
hello, I have the panasonic SDR-H250EG and SDR-S-S-H20EG closer in my choices made.
So there are some differences:
SDR-H250EG-S
has a receptive but little illumination optical zoom!
SRD-S-H20EG
Unfortunately, no recording, but make it a lighting otischen megazoom!
the rest is quite the same!
my question:
is a receptive lighting important? because both have a super NIGHTSHOT!
bringest the NIGHTSHOT überhaupt?
I can, if necessary for the SDR-S is a H20EG receptive lighting to buy? namely've seen them in separate receptive panasonic synonymous lights offer, but the fit at all on the SDR-H20EG-S?
I thank you already now for your help!
mfg
Antwort von Jan:
I wanted to contribute not really answer a lot of info can be found at Panasonic.de. The other users were probably similar.
Well a few differences - the H 20 has not:
-3 CCD system (sharper picture (generally) - more structured and meaningful bright colors
- Tele Macro (naheran go to the object and with the zoom)
- AGS (Anti Ground Shooting - no accidental "ground films)
- Battery CGA DU 12 (H 20 has only small Battery CGR du 6 supplied)
- Leica Optics (no huge differences to the original Panasonic, even a trace of sharpness in a better performance)
- Remote control included
- 3 million pixel photos
The inclusion of lighting brings nothing anyway, at least a small built-Funzel illuminates only a few cm.
An anamorphic (enhanced 16 / 9 mode), both the H 20 has even more and better Tele Wide Angle With 1 chip technology.
If what I forgot to look again at Panasonic.de pure, this was just quick off the cuff.
None comes with NightShot Panasonic, Nachtprogamm therefore synonymous with the movement for popular amateurs. Panas night program called usually Nightview and with all models used a longer shutter speed (the picture is brighter) - ca 1/3-1/6 sec motion display is clear but that's not possible.
For light, they have no shoes, sometimes bad.
So a rail her, nimm SonyHVL zb 10 nH - with 4 standard batteries and a track (this is with). 10 Watts is just a beginning. Fang but please not with the Ledlampen to ...
VG
Jan
Antwort von berndi:
So the rule is in the 250, it was better.
how is the zoom mitn because one has 10x optical zoom and the other 32x optical zoom.
as far as it zooms really, so how many cm? white perhaps coincidentally who?
mfg
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
hello, I have the panasonic SDR-H250EG and SDR-S-S-H20EG closer in my choices made.
So there are some differences:
SDR-H250EG-S
has a receptive but little illumination optical zoom!
SRD-S-H20EG
Unfortunately, no recording, but make it a lighting otischen megazoom!
the rest is quite the same!
my question:
is a receptive lighting important? because both have a super NIGHTSHOT!
bringest the NIGHTSHOT überhaupt?
I can, if necessary for the SDR-S is a H20EG receptive lighting to buy? namely've seen them in separate receptive panasonic synonymous lights offer, but the fit at all on the SDR-H20EG-S?
I thank you already now for your help!
mfg The most important of all is yes, as my predecessors have noted the difference between 1CCD and 3CCD technology.
A Camera s.Zoom compare is just as if you have a car just after the PS indication buy!
Antwort von Jan:
Hi, were you still are not at the Pana or Page?
SDR H 20 SDR H 250 With the focal lengths are indicated in cm can be rather bad to calculate (or rather, represent).
At best you look on the net after a focal length comparison, take zb
Antwort von sabine111:
I am interested synonymous for the Panasonic SDR-H250 eg-s but I had read an article about this cam at the photo quality is not very good and the autofocus is a bit too slow to be
Color, sharpness and contrast to be in good light conditions to be okay, but inside there are slight visual recordings rushing.
agrees that all?
maybe someone has the cam and what can I say about the quality?
I would actually not only film and photograph!
Thank you
Antwort von Jan:
Hi,
I think you get with the H 20 & 250 two good cameras with a maximum of only minor weaknesses, such as not Editable in the camcorder.
The image noise problems have actually all consumer models, a little more than the others.
You as a company synonymous any problem, you're holding, as usual, small sensors - the Bildrauschanfällig are, especially at high DB figures. What can you do?
The rather harsh anti-noise (usually likes of Panasonic fabricates) makes stop in fine detail only mud, the surface of wood looks like as of metal. A very tough picture processing provides for increasingly synonymous artifacts in pans can still tend to be seen.
Other companies behave in image processing and with anti-noise filtering back something that is rather greater brightness and especially the even more annoying color are increasingly concerned.
But I think with time is even more out of the sensors that would be bad only if the company still would use smaller sensors ....
Panasonic is known for their 3 CCD models, depending on the model for a bit more color in daylight, which is synonymous for the 250th H
Although Canon is synonymous Sonyaus their 1 Chipper rausholen much.
With one or three 1 / 6 "sensors is not equivalent with a video camera in regards to digital photos, which is synonymous with the so-250er.
Test report of the well-known magazines are always entertaining
Partly synonymous informative. I must nonetheless times Motzen, 2 well-known magazines have the JVC HD 7 tested, which came out in stabilizer? Maybe number 1 gave the maximum score (video), Mag number 2 has criticized him arg (VAD)
What gives?
When two well-known magazines already so far apart, whom
then should we trust?
My tip look at the model to predict themselves, and decide then!
PS sorry for the excessive length of contribution
VG
Jan
