I'm looking for a unit to record my songs (I sing). I have already compatriots but found nothing usable. there should be a device in which as little as possible to agree not changed.
it would be very nice if you write me, if you know what kind of equipment I need. I would already synonymous of the term of such a rich device and no specific model.
Many thanks in advance.
singIT
Antwort von der henne:
Search times for "field recorder. The Zoom H2 is quite good.
Antwort von bluznvideo:
If you want to have 1 device, then you can have a Pocket Recorder (for example, Zoom H4) take. When it is a bit of a professional should be, I would in any case, a vocal micro (eg Shure SM58) and the s.ein good s.einen computer audio interface with corresponding software to connect. Finally comes the need to know how much you want to spend and what happened with the recordings should be.
VG Martin
Antwort von noch n´Gast:
there's really only the Zoom H4. The extra cost compared to the H2 will definitely be compensated. Then the part can be synonymous wonderful as an audio interface, and thus halt the fast, economical way to record. I have here the almost complete studio peripherals rumstehen once Harddiskrecording on Macs, but still synonymous old analog technology (which I do not hergeben be synonymous). When I see what the carding times has cost and what is today for a fraction of previous prices for a quality offering, then I could annoy me. Oh, and before I forget, like the Shure SM58 is a good song for the micro-stage was, for the studio's good for only a very limited because it is now synonymous as better and cheaper there. In addition, you as a singer synonymous with the Micro can operate.
Antwort von bluznvideo:
@ yet n'Gast: strange ...
"nor n'Gast" wrote:
Oh, and before I forget, like the Shure SM58 is a good song for the micro stage been
Is it worse?
"nor n'Gast" wrote:
Studio's good for only a very limited because it is synonymous because now is better and cheaper.
Do not understand me wrong, I can not verify the synonymous and will not doubt what you say, but I opened up the not entirely successful. Can you spell? Why is it not? But not by the fact that there are cheaper and better. That makes it pointless, but perhaps not unfit. And what would be better suited as? After all, the Shure SM58 Micro singing ...
But we do not know what exactly it wants singIT (studio / stage).
"nor n'Gast" wrote:
In addition, you as a singer synonymous with the Micro can operate.
Now that is probably nothing else than to learn ;-)
Otherwise, your full consent to post. VG Martin
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
There are now more vocal microphones for the stage. And for a studio is a condenser microphone rather than a dynamic Micro, as it is SM58.
This is not mandatory, but for clear pictures I prefer condenser microphones, the transducer because of the better principle of "genuine" are capable of vocal recordings and the upper frequency range of more transparency.
But as already synonymous video freak who with his MiniDV not want the cool look of a Hollywood film strips-how, synonymous with a gloomy picture ARRICAM only on material ban would ... It requires more than a "Take a Sennheiser because it is a good brand."
I would advise a Beyerdynamic: D --- no nonsense, studied a bit
Antwort von PowerMac:
I have a Tascam Pocket Studio 5 lying. Was quite good. Perhaps something needed?
Antwort von noch n´Gast:
Because Christmas is, you can still 'nen Fuffi to give, if seriously meant was. The thing was beautiful and expensive, and very quickly away from the window because the Zoom PS04 (eg) better, was cheaper and smaller. I got my Tascam even three years ago for 'nen Hunni can sell, but today, I would really give away (or for the private museum's repeal, as I keep up with my TASCAM 688 (maximum of 100 hours on the recorder part and looks As new) and the Emagic Unitor and my ATARI überlege. And what the outposts or ShureSM58 is concerned. The Shure is a micro-stage, for example, against a T-Bone SC1100 or SC2000 really no trick. Firstly, the frequency response of the Shure is not as heady, secondly, it sounds quite bright, and thirdly you can with the example referred to as synonymous Mikros a few other things increasing. Sure sounds of yet more expensive mics Neumann, AKG, Schoeps Brown or even better, but the huge price differences on the T-Bones and consorts worth in times where you "Music" almost exclusively as an MP3 to listen to mobile phones, hardly more. I hear the differences yet, but currently working consciously with the "cheap" stuff, because I prefer ten cheap microphones reserved for specific tasks, as an expensive, then certain things but can not. And this is actually from the business point of view more useful approach, and for my ego's rail, at least for me, the better, because I believe None that I worked with said things. Craft level.
