| where creative commons / common-free music from?
Question of drsost:
Januar 2009
Hello,
someone can give me a directory name, where I Common Music & financial freedom, which under the Creative Commons license and may be used free of charge?
Sought is somewhat synonymous for non-commercial and commercial.
Is there somewhere a side entrance?
THANK YOU!
Reply ksr:
Search times in the forum, there a lot of threads about this (and the difference Royalty-free note, etc. ...).
Perhaps that is synonymous here was: www.musopen.com
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Hello,
someone can give me a directory name, where I Common Music & financial freedom, which under the Creative Commons license and may be used free of charge?
Sought is somewhat synonymous for non-commercial and commercial.
Is there somewhere a side entrance?
THANK YOU!
There is no music you can use free of charge! GEMA represents only the author, not the performance rights holders !!!!!! All this is a widespread misconception that not even the press until now has understood!
On a piece of music there are the following rights:
Lyricists = authors => belongs to Verlag => representation of GEMA
Composer = originator => Publishing = is> represented by GEMA
Performing artist / owner Musikter = power => belongs to Producer> Label / Record Company => not represented by a third party! (Exceptions: GVL)
GEMA covers only the first two, which are those who work with s.wenigsten of Music had, but the last party, often people from x, is the performance in the form of licenses have to be paid. Even if it is three Royalty is that these people will not be interested.
MB
Reply Bernd E.:
... There is no music you can use for free ...
There is of course, and especially after this was synonymous asked: From the GEMA was no talk here and because of the thread starter used formulations may be assumed that it the difference between "free" and "GEMA-free" is well aware.
Reply MarcBallhaus:
There is of course, and especially after this was synonymous asked: From the GEMA was no talk here and because of the thread starter used formulations may be assumed that it the difference between "free" and "GEMA-free" is well aware.
By GEMA was no talk? What do you think probably what "public domain" should be hot? ... tz ... and the slash is in the German Language "or". Who can read is a clear advantage. And that the difference is most bewussst, is simply not at all. Most go on thin ice so because of the complex do not know. In addition, includes a creative commons license the commercial use of mostly categorical.
MB
Reply Bernd E.:
... From the GEMA was no talk? What do you think probably what "public domain" should be hot ...
Probably exactly what the questioner in the subordinate clause is further defined: a free music, which is CC. Who can read the posting will take place in any case not explicitly question the GEMA would apply. And so I leave the field once again synonymous with the music experts ;-)
Reply KrischanDO:
Marc,
imm remain loose.
There is probably really "public domain" mean, by analogy with "public domain".
Composer might be given to those for the staging of their plays do not want to see coal, similar to the amateur photographers who are happy when their pictures are printed times.
I notice there jamendo.com, and is not for free, but free and GEMA-negotiable.
regards
Christian
Reply MarcBallhaus:
I myself made long music and published several sheets. I am basically allergic react when I read something and especially the stupidity of the press likes vebreitetet. The authors have never had a problem, but to license the site in recent years, thousands of people lost their jobs, and I give it synonymous to blame the press because she has still not understood how the business works and the Germans have always talked of GEMA ... it is sick to me. Sorry, is not meant personally.
In life nothing is free, Music garnicht already, because if they have something good, has at least one person so much work done, but usually 5-10 people, and that is simply paid.
And, again, public domain, Creative Common or completely no preference as it is: A commercial use is actually categorically excluded, and the thread author wants to commercially exploit.
MB
Reply Ficeduld:
And, again, public domain, Creative Common or completely no preference as it is: A commercial use is actually categorically excluded, and the thread author wants to commercially exploit.
MB
Marc Sorry this is absolute nonsense. There are Creative Commons licenses in which the composer, lyricist what its creators always synonymous composition thee free, explicitly for commercial use, licensed. Just look at Jamendo and the website of the Ctreative Commons visit
Regards
Reply drsost:
I am not the GEMA synonymous and have said that commercial and non-commercial searches.
The term commercially in the area of application is in some ways not, but maybe. The separation in the area of application is very difficult and therefore I simply search for both.
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Marc Sorry this is absolute nonsense. There are Creative Commons licenses in which the composer, lyricist what its creators always synonymous composition thee free, explicitly for commercial use, licensed. Just look at Jamendo and the website of the Ctreative Commons visit
Regards
Probably falls into the category of "junk", but hardly in the category of art. I know many professional musicians, many good and not quite as professional, but None of which would offer something, I know not even one of the GEMA-free, because the bottles are usually bad for the deal are NEN. I have never seen something synonymous GEMA free only heard what was reasonably good.
MB
Reply marsteini:
Probably falls into the category of "junk", but hardly in the category of art. I know many professional musicians, many good and not quite as professional, but None of which would offer something, I know not even one of the GEMA-free, because the bottles are usually bad for the deal are NEN. I have never seen something synonymous GEMA free only heard what was reasonably good.
MB
Well, yes that's true now synonymous not. Especially on Jamendo find good titles quite often - especially in the field of techno / trance music, etc., which "borrows" without much tape can be made ...
But that's true at least not!
Reply shodushitanaka:
Probably falls into the category of "junk"
MB
10,000 albums (Jamendo) and every scrap title? Not even this one? Aha, see, you probably do not even reingehört and talk to people here uninhibited your own scrap A. And what you personally like or do not feel as art or not, interested not sow. Will not attack you but such a waste .... bad.
Reply shodushitanaka:
Probably falls into the category of "junk"
MB
10,000 albums (Jamendo) and every scrap title? Not even this one? Ah, understand ... Presumably you have not even reingehört and talk to people here uninhibited your own scrap A. And what you personally like or do not feel as art or not, definitely not interested sow. Will not attack you but such a waste .... bad.
Reply Ficeduld:
That's right.
Just as a small tip as Beisiel for electric groove jazz at its finest:
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Well, yes that's true now synonymous not. Especially on Jamendo find good titles quite often - especially in the field of techno / trance music, etc., which "borrows" without much tape can be made ...
But that's true at least not!
And the charge is commercially exploitable?
10,000 albums (Jamendo) and every scrap title? Not even this one? Ah, understand ... Presumably you have not even reingehört and talk to people here uninhibited your own scrap A. And what you personally like or do not feel as art or not, definitely not interested sow. Will not attack you but such a waste .... bad.
Call me a single reason why a talented artist should give his music? Even if it is only electronical? For good compositions pay publishers pay for good productions labels, there is simply no reason ... unless nobody is willing to pay, and if so, the music is just worthless.
MB
Reply Ficeduld:
Say, have you ever really own music made?
The situation is rather this: You make the best music in the world and is interested not sow. Even 10 years ago sat the clerk of a large record company in front of a stack of demo CD's to s.einem days reinkamen and has listen to it without a ton of force in the.
Tens of thousands of bands and musicians to have experienced something that only waited for the arrogant and autocratic record companies in the A to join. The first step was the possibility to burn CD's. Now offering platforms like Jamendo any tape of their music the chance to be heard worldwide. And some people will suddenly discover ergattert and a contract. Or get money for a commercial license their songs.
If you want another reason?
Musicians enter into a contract with a label which they have completely einschnürt musically. Here you have under a pseudonym, the Freiheitt to do what they want ... and they do it.
So, in the'80s did you had probably right ....
Reply shodushitanaka:
Call me a single reason why a talented artist should give his music? Even if it is only electronical? For good compositions pay publishers pay for good productions labels, there is simply no reason ... unless nobody is willing to pay, and if so, the music is just worthless.
MB
It is to film or music for movies.
What I am saying, There are very good, free or not very expensive music. And if we as a fast ne Saxofon for prosecution or for shallow clouds, etc. Pianogeklimper needs, then you will find what most usable. Für nen club, theater, etc. may be worthless in the film but it fulfills its purpose. Although it is by the famous film composer must originate or encourage people to have to dance.
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Say, have you ever really own music made?
The situation is rather this: You make the best music in the world and is interested not sow. Even 10 years ago sat the clerk of a large record company in front of a stack of demo CD's to s.einem days reinkamen and has listen to it without a ton of force in the.
Tens of thousands of bands and musicians to have experienced something that only waited for the arrogant and autocratic record companies in the A to join. The first step was the possibility to burn CD's. Now offering platforms like Jamendo any tape of their music the chance to be heard worldwide. And some people will suddenly discover ergattert and a contract. Or get money for a commercial license their songs.
If you want another reason?
Musicians enter into a contract with a label which they have completely einschnürt musically. Here you have under a pseudonym, the Freiheitt to do what they want ... and they do it.
So, in the'80s did you had probably right ....
Yes I have, in the professional league, and that is why I know it is synonymous.
It is to film or music for movies.
What I am saying, There are very good, free or not very expensive music. And if we as a fast ne Saxofon for prosecution or for shallow clouds, etc. Pianogeklimper needs, then you will find what most usable. Für nen club, theater, etc. may be worthless in the film but it fulfills its purpose. Although it is by the famous film composer must originate or encourage people to have to dance.
For me, the sound 50% of the image. And this includes the synonymous Music. Without really good music in the Picture, I can not think.
MB
Reply markusG:
In life nothing is free, Music garnicht already, because if they have something good, has at least one person so much work done, but usually 5-10 people, and that is simply paid.
Newcomer synonymous can be satisfied at all to be played. Not everyone makes the music profession.
And the question for commercial / non-commercial, but first has nothing to do with Gema, so s.Rande. Gema's looks whether publicly or not.
And by the way: Nine Inch Nails recently released Music, which is to be disseminated - Free license if I have understood correctly. Just the job site;)
Reply MarcBallhaus:
But is synonymous no preference, I can understand your reasoning yes. Maybe I'm too old to slow the flow of things yet to recognize the right;)
Then I will, I just make the task s.and s.mal there to listen and here and there a few times when people zuzuspielen me out what should be dropped. I learn so happy about this.
MB
Reply frm:
I've synonymous nor a Besispiel if you want commercial use. They are very competent and very inexpensive synonymous. I just music for a cinema advertising purchased and this costs 80 EUR.
The next legally synonymous help.
http://www.sonoton.de/
Reply Christian Schmitt:
Search just the music I use for editorial contributions of NGOs (in Germany as a non-recognized eV) can use and with minimal cost for unlimited streaming on demand can use.
Do I understand correctly, the CC license and is a contributing editorial about environmental pollution as a non-factory?
Hat jmd here on Jamendo schonmal the use of individual titles, eg in a TV contribution clarified?
To GEMA: here's someone who works for the transmitter and can confirm that in addition to songs for the GEMA package always be the rights to the label be?
How does it work in practice?
(Ich hab das jedenfalls never noticed when I still worked for television ...)
Reply klaas:
To GEMA: here's someone who works for the transmitter and can confirm that in addition to songs for the GEMA package always be the rights to the label be?
How does it work in practice?
(Ich hab das jedenfalls never noticed when I still worked for television ...)
You get the broadcasting rights of the Gema ...
Reply MarcBallhaus:
To GEMA: here's someone who works for the transmitter and can confirm that in addition to songs for the GEMA package always be the rights to the label be?
How does it work in practice?
(Ich hab das jedenfalls never noticed when I still worked for television ...) You get the broadcasting rights of the Gema ... http://www.gema.de/fileadmin/inhaltsdateien/musiknutzer/senden/s_vr_fs_pr_tarif.pdf gruß, klaas.
NO !!!!!! WRONG! THIS IS semi! Is it really too much to ask to read my posts here again before the next semi spread?
You get no standard broadcasting rights of the GEMA, GEMA only because the author represents. That's not so hard to understand! You need the authorization for the use of copyright and to use the service right, first of gibts GEMA (properly!), Second there in case of radio broadcast of the GVL. Never before on the LC code on EVERY CD wondered? Let people tell you something!
Search just the music I use for editorial contributions of NGOs (in Germany as a non-recognized eV) can use and with minimal cost for unlimited streaming on demand can use.
Do I understand correctly, the CC license and is a contributing editorial about environmental pollution as a non-factory?
Hat jmd here on Jamendo schonmal the use of individual titles, eg in a TV contribution clarified?
To GEMA: here's someone who works for the transmitter and can confirm that in addition to songs for the GEMA package always be the rights to the label be?
How does it work in practice?
(Ich hab das jedenfalls never noticed when I still worked for television ...)
Oh people ... throws but not all the time. What's right with the press of commercial exploitation to be done? Answer: NOTHING, ZERO, NADA. This is a completely different thing and is in fact synonymous not only of the GEMA settled.
I've synonymous nor a Besispiel if you want commercial use. They are very competent and very inexpensive synonymous. I just music for a cinema advertising purchased and this costs 80 EUR.
The next legally synonymous help.
http://www.sonoton.de/
EUR 80, clear, but GEMA PLUS!
----------------
This distribution of this technical bullshit times to an end, but simply invites you and take a member of the GEMA contract down, so as if its composer wäret and GEMA would represent you. There is in it exactly what the GEMA s.Rechten perceives and what is not. The Conclusion will be: GEMA cares strictly paper, and although one which, on their notes herniedergeschrieben did. To nothing else GEMA mentioned not a word with any music person - but synonymous rights. GEMA is simply not competent to make the labels and the GVL. One is the composition s.sich, the other the recording, a paper, the other audible material - both legally has nothing to do with each other.
MB
Reply klaas:
Broadcasting rights of GEMA, performance right of GVL is true ...
But more interesting is that you do not Rehcte from the label or publishing needs ... not even the consent of the artist as GEMA and GVL must conclude
gruß, klaas.
Reply Christian Schmitt:
@ marc and klaas
Wat now and as it is now?
Can me a definitive statement on the use of copyrighted music (such as Madonna, etc.) in an editorial environment (in my case, environmental contributions for an NGO) made?
No commercials in their own case, simply think Greenpeace makes a dedicated team with a report on the domestic water lakes.
"Broadcast" will be in your own web portal, via streaming on demand.
What do I need?
Gema + GVL?
Gema + + GVL consent of the label / artist?
1000 Thanks!
- Christian
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Broadcasting rights of GEMA, performance right of GVL is true ...
You go me on the biscuit, very real. You have absolutely no idea of the matter, no shimmer, but this post wild drauf los, just because of what you are broadcasting rights in the form GEMA've read.
Lies you kindly right, before you give advice here the other financially can be fatal. That is absolutely not ok what you do here. I hardly believe that you have to pay if anyone here purely because of your recommendation today.
What do I need?
Gema + GVL?
Gema + + GVL consent of the label / artist?
- Christian
If you want to be sure, then the latter. Indeed, a sharp lawyer finder could make a commercial benefits in that a particular organization so applies, not the press law.
For more accurate take a lawyer, I'm here to None and not synonymous Jurisconsult mimes.
MB
Reply klaas:
Send the right is the right of broadcasting in the public or private television is no preference.
you do not need to right the labels and publishers of ...
gruß, klaas.
Reply MarcBallhaus:
Send the right is the right of broadcasting in the public or private television is no preference.
you do not need to right the labels and publishers of ...
gruß, klaas.
I declare to you now what that means. It only means that you have with your radio broadcast of your orchestra or band scores of the paper and the play can send. Nothing else Do you really not? GEMA represents publishers and authors, provide both paper and NO recorded music!
I bet with you to any amount you mention that you are wrong. To everyone. I am 20 years GEMA member, an author and a publisher, almost as long as I have a registered label with the GVL, you do not know what you are talking about here.
MB
Reply Christian Schmitt:
If you want to be sure, then the latter. Indeed, a sharp lawyer finder could make a commercial benefits in that a particular organization so applies, not the press law.
For more accurate take a lawyer, I'm here to None and not synonymous Jurisconsult mimes.
MB
Hmm, should be clear what the editorial contribution and what advertising / marketing / PR is - but you're right, I'll give the next time ...
( "World of Wonders" is probably because in a gray area ...)
And you agree with an association is a recognized, which is not profit, will find difficult to a "commercial benefit" under the can.
Thanks in any case!
Reply Dirschl:
CC Music s.einfachsten when you get Jamendo recently and is 2 EUR for a commercial license for certain securities acquirable. In addition to contact the artists personally and always, but so far have been very pleased. I myself am a musician CC synonymous and synonymous write film music. I have a super genius gerdade Piano Instrumental Music CD finished. With YouTube you can see Vladimir Sterzinger live. But a good film, the emotion is made and the only perfect if the music on the film is written.
It is not always complete songs, but the sequences of the film value. I can you GEMA-free songs on piano, synth, guitar, etc. .. supply. Just contact me. The effort to write a song is low. Usually 1 day per song - So many man nix 5-10 weeks (this is usually the justification of the music industry ...). Man needs so usually no orchestra or a singer / songwriter. You can yes the Burghausen Video (128 views of the longest castle in Europe) view we have of 19:00 clock to 2 clock early twosome worked. The Environment Video - emission prevention Sagar live, we have recorded and then mastered just yet. That's just been working 7 hours.
If your so good musician knows, it just asks where they are not provided according to the GEMA are. If you have as a musician only licenses sold, which is possible for CC, then it is for both the film producers as synonymous for the musician is good business. Unlike GEMA Music, individual contracts with the artists will be closed.
Super thing.
Examples on YouTube and your own CC Music:
http://www.youtube.com/DIRSCHLcom
| |
