DVL-Digest 1284 - Postings: Index AvidDV 3.0-> 3.5? DVD encoding Shake vs. AE Splicing Tape (was I need help -- JVC 9600 Deck Damaged?) AvidDV 3.0-> 3.5? - "Valerie Shoaps" >The color correction makes it very >tempting but, I just got my system stable w/ Win2K. Anything else besides >color correction that makes it worth it? Color correction is the biggie, but there's also support for more decks, and timecode offset. If you don't need those, then... If it matters, XP can be just as stable, once you know how to tame the extraneous stuff. Valerie DVD encoding - "Perry Mitchell" From: James C. Anderson > > What our French colleague neglected to tell us is what platform he is using. > If he is on the Mac then I can sympathise for a lack of affordable speedy > MPEG2 encoding. > In despair I decided to bite the bullet and for the price of DVD SP I made a > production PC, and for that platform there is all manner of MPEG2 solutions. > Gee, Perry, I thought you were happy with the Digital Media Press MPEG encoder card. I thought I might pick one up when the updated card comes out. Now you've ditched it and gone PC? Say it ain't so! Shake vs. AE - "Valerie Shoaps" >>> FCP covers Premiere and a high percentage of AE.. >> >> I really can't swallow that. FCP is not nearly the compositing tool >> that AE is. > >I do not agree with that... I have been working a lot with AE.. in fact >between 1996-1999 at my studio we was using AE to do all the >compositing.. and M100 just to do the mastering.. I have been thousends >of hours working with AE.. so I know the App quite well and not doing >just easy jobs, lots of multilayering compositions, you can check at >www.mastervideo.cc Since the release of FCP we have drop the use of >AE as well as a 70%... almost everything is done with FCP... AE is >keept for that special filter wich is not running on FCP..or the motion >stabilizer, or the time strech.. the specific functions that FCP >doesn't have... Jordi, I think you are mixing your email lists. "Shake vs. AE" is a thread on the AE list. But since you mentioned it... FCP has some basic compositing tools. However, they are "basic". Transfer modes are very nice. If you can accomplish your compositing needs in FCP, all the power to you. However, for more sophisticated work, AE has 3D layers/cameras/lights, much better time effects and motion interploation, full vector text support, displacement mapping, motion tracking, better subpixel resampling, etc... It's not a threat to AE, FFI-C*2, Shake, or DF. I think Boris' Continuum Complete brings a lot to the NLE table, but it won't knock off any of the major mogfx programs either. Valerie Splicing Tape (was I need help -- JVC 9600 Deck Damaged?) - "Perry Mitchell" From: Maike13 What's the recommended method for splicing a tape? I've a broken one that I'd like to try to salvage. Is this more of a risk in potential deck damage than it's worth? Also the tape looks like it's stretched on either side of the break. I'm assuming I should cut it back either side of the break but how far is recommended. (diese posts stammen von der DV-L Mailingliste - THX to Adam Wilt and Perry Mitchell :-) [up] |
 slashCAM  News HD Camcorder database One-on-One Cam comparison About our tests About us |
|
|
