Frage von deti:
... declared the bodies of the ARD is now surprising that it had failed as a single HDTV production and exchange format ...
Consequently, should "all HDTV contribution / raw material and / or Sendesignalzulieferungen" with immediate effect in the scanning raster 1080i50 (named place of stations synonymous 1080i/25)
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/ARD-720p-HD-als-gemeinsames-Produktionsformat-gescheitert-Update-1031977.html
Deti
Antwort von Marco:
This is really old hat, since almost no one produces at 720p. Currently open the question of what will happen with the broadcast standard, or what will happen as quickly.
Marco
Antwort von domain:
The 720-format so it is all a joke.
All cameras, as synonymous, the TVs have been working for some time with the 1080 format. It would be logical that 1080i50, once of the bandwidth, etc. would be possible here is switched to 1080p50.
I am looking forward such reports, as this one, extraordinary. For example, in Austria I refuse steadfastly to the ORF of 720-he offered to switch format with payment.
The times I can.
Antwort von Marco:
I find nothing wrong s.720p50. But it must be the entire production and broadcast chain to be coordinated. The current chaos is plenty wrong.
Marco
Antwort von domain:
At the time of that decision was 720p50 EBU sure nothing bad. But it also shows the reality today strangeness of that decision maker and I am sure that this format will be one in a very short time to history.
Antwort von beiti:
Although I was always an opponent of 720/50p interlaced and a fan of the format, but I see a synonymous, that the international deadlock makes it necessary to rethink the station. It is unfortunately not always in practice by the better standard, and sometimes wins the marketing ("Full HD").
Before we get to see now 100% of the ER program, only to be converted into form, I am sure the same switch the transmission method.
At a regular operation of 1080/50p we will probably wait a long time. So far there is neither sufficient nor an appropriate broadcast standard production equipment that could be integrated as a precaution in new receivers. One must probably assume that the most recent HD receivers can not send update 1080/50p are synonymous. Thus, if the technicians do not think of what really Spiffy (ie a backwards-compatible to broadcast standard 1080/50i), the first modulating means back several years simulcasts. This can be thought of at the earliest when the SD broadcast has now been set (otherwise you would need a triple-broadcast). And as long as the departure of Resolutionnoch takes SD, I do not dare to predict, we know today is not even completed the digitization of satellite and cable.
Antwort von Alf_300:
I tipe more going for it that the TV stations once again comes to the cost
Antwort von beiti:
Does anyone know how the current situation in the U.S.?
The transmitters have there already a few years earlier started with HDTV, and I have heard to believe that there still is a coexistence of 720/60p and 1080/60i format.
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
Probably buy all the cameramen to an EB-707 can deliver, at 50p, but that's just a joke! Although the camera makes no bad shots and with a little skill synonymous nice sharpness and relocation permits manual work. For outdoor productions probably not a bad choice to capture 180p50 material.
But have switched to the ER all Transmitter takes eh still is in many shoots in the current before the DigiBeta rotated with how often I experience is that customers want SD, with corporate films is always the lowest really HD.
to some point get to 2k then 4k and maybe then 8k, Full HD is really only relative to what the industry just as FullHD see and buy the customer, at normal viewing distance of 3-5 m, the end user before notice no difference as long as it in the belief can actually be seen, as his eyes can actually see, often when the end user still needs x-glasses etc.
Antwort von domain:
... At normal viewing distance of 3-5 m before the end customer can see no difference as long as it does in the belief really more to see than can actually see his eyes, often when the end user still needs x-glasses etc.
How true.
We currently have many HD Television with HD signal in the pub gardens around the city for the football World Cup. Honestly, I can hardly make a difference between PAL and the 720-downskalierten he finds out from the ORF format. Only when one goes pretty close, we can see the slightly sharper script of the inserts. The stubble of the singing Hymnne players but no one interested in anyway. So really is all one, the experience is diminished in value from the game itself in None PAL way :-)
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
It counts:
Main, the customer buys!
... and is satisfied!
