Frage von NikNolte:
When I look at the class or the SonyHDR-XR500 Panasonic DC-TM350, then draw all the half-images at 1080i on, so with.
Nevertheless, the really good shots to make .. Gibts actually synonymous affordable camcorders that with the better record 1080p and how big the differences are there?
Antwort von WoWu:
Frames are characterized not only by the fact that there are two fields but synonymous in that the color processing is different, because
one field related (systemic) when de-Interleasing its color information always are in the wrong line, and thus no artefacts to prevent.
Of time not to mention the usual temporal artifacts.
But these debates have been conducted thoroughly and often.
It is always a question of entitlement that one has s.das Picture.
If you (i) sufficient ... no problem, then go ahead (i).
Antwort von NikNolte:
How can I assess whether (i ranges), if I have not seen a (p)-films and I do not know any "normal" CamCorder which aufnehemen in this format, or am I wrong there?
Antwort von deti:
How can I assess whether (i ranges), if I have not seen a (p)-films and I do not know any "normal" CamCorder which aufnehemen in this format, or am I wrong there? What is your target format? What motives are filmed?
Examples of source formats and their application with decreasing preference:
- 50p: standardized for rapid movements such as sports, slow motion - technically currently only in 720th With good little camera filmed of 1080 to distinguish.
- 25p: downscale in 1080 for detailed images without rapid movements (eg, landscapes, interviews), in 720 for HD Web videos - not advisable -> more of 1080th Attention: Consumer cameras often lose 25p Resolution!
- 50i: Detailed kingdom only for static subjects. Loss of detail in fast motion - suitable only for fast movements, for example, if you later scaled down to 720 and / or has a good deinterlacer.
Deti
Antwort von NikNolte:
And what now provide the consumer camcorder?
Antwort von WoWu:
Deti @
in 720 for high-definition Web video - not advisable -> more downscale of 1080th I can recommend under any circumstances, because the quality is not nearly as good as native 720th
Even with hardware (S & W) can still be significant differences.
@ NikNolte
Deti has described it already .... what is your target content. The ConsumerCams make every possible format.
It is questionable, it is only in the class that arise as the format.
Antwort von NikNolte:
Well, I'm just a filmmaker holidays, birthdays and special events, so no sports photography, etc. ...
I really wanted to buy a SonyHDR500 and has had only a camera in the SD format ..
Antwort von tommyb:
Then you 1080i is quite thick enough.
Antwort von deti:
Deti @ in 720 for high-definition Web video - not advisable -> more downscale of 1080th
I can recommend under any circumstances, because the quality is not nearly as good as native 720th
Even with hardware (S & W) can still be significant differences. I clearly said that's enough for web scaling down against the background that the local film with ca / s 2Mbit are encoded at 720p25, but with 1080p and man in post-processing still has more creative freedom, for example, to zoom in image areas. I did not say that someone should follow this professional workflow.
Deti
Antwort von WoWu:
True, the "Web" hab'ich overlooked, sry.
But how did you get to Web video, which was not even mentioned?
@ NikNolte
I hope you are aware that you get at 1080x1920 as well as None consumer camera. Not only that, it is usually only 1440x1080 anyway, synonymous, the Resolutions of the optics are far from the desired resolutions. Not to mention the chips quite, especially with the 1-chip cams.
To that extent you're with a native 720p50 resolution (that's the resolution that serves the synonymous ARD and ZDF broadcast HD) is actually better than with a resolution of 1080 does not in any case, but only works in half-frames, with all the known consequences .
Antwort von NikNolte:
Now, I do not understand ... the consumer camcorder at the top, as above, but should 1920x1080 Resolutionbringen ..
The perhaps not with the professional cameras are compared, may be so, but should not get the 1440 (which I have a Blue-Ray players, burners and Television?)
Remain so, but in SD??
Antwort von wolfgang:
No, I would not stay in SD - but then you should be able to enjoy HD synonymous (and want). Say: cut your footage in HD, Blu Ray or playing of homemade media players, and watch HDTV on a gscheit the matter.
Antwort von NikNolte:
of course ...
Antwort von WoWu:
@ NikNolte
Wolfgang has said it already, which should of course be no Plädeuer for SD but if I the consumer area, 1080i (25) and 720p50 to ask, has 720 well ahead. ) If you someday really) (from the sensor + from the 1080s Resolution Lens (no preference whether i or p gets, then you can re-think.
But as long as my sensor can not even represent the difference in approach between 720 and 1080 and not only my Optics and yet quite come to the unspeakable (i) artifacts do you need a lot of love for the interlace television to make such a decision .
Or alternatively, just have such a miserable Wiedergabeweg that the differences are not visible.
You get these days than 1080, but no real compromises only 1080 in the price range.
Only if I had had the choice between i and p, I would have in any case, the fingers of (i).
