Frage von jimihendrix187:
Hello people, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Please I need your help, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Have a video with Magix per X4 exported: \u003cbr /\u003e MTS file with 29.9 fps 1080p, 16:9, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now I stand under pressure, the video is shown on a plain in regional TV transmitter Yuhu! Now the conditions of the transmitter are as follows: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Technical Guidelines for Video Submission \u003cbr /\u003e 720 x 576 PAL \u003cbr /\u003e 16:9, only 25 fps, progressive or interleaved \u003cbr /\u003e Format: QuickTime, AVI, MKV, MPEG4, H.264, MPEG2 (a.6 Mbps) \u003cbr /\u003e Even 720p or 1080p HD videos will be accepted \u003cbr /\u003e Tone: -10 dB (not mandatory, but waer nice) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Please help me I'm not trained and do not know how to convert the video .. My problem is I still access the original Project, Magix can not (broken desktop) I've only
Antwort von Alf_300:
I'd proceed with CS5 follows. \u003cbr /\u003e Formally, 1080p24 \u003cbr /\u003e Image and sound separated \u003cbr /\u003e Import video in Premiere \u003cbr /\u003e Interpreieren footage to 23.976 \u003cbr /\u003e Pure tone \u003cbr /\u003e Film speed / length a.Tone adapt \u003cbr /\u003e Film Halbbildopionen reduce flicker \u003cbr /\u003e and Rendering
Antwort von jimihendrix187:
thanks for the quick help! \u003cbr /\u003e unfortunately I have not much experience with CS5 only ever cut with magix. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I know is a lot to ask but would you be so kind to me and it still koenntest explain in more detail? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e thank you nice
Antwort von Alf_300:
Still more difficult is because it is actually quite simple \u003cbr /\u003e With tsMuxer (google) 1.1.0.6 Image and Disconnect Tone \u003cbr /\u003e then in CS5 a Project: 1080p AVCHD \u003cbr /\u003e and next, as described \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e http://www.chip.de/downloads/tsMuxeR-GUI_42591287.html
Antwort von dienstag_01:
The Augangsformat is not 24p but 29.9 ... \u003cbr /\u003e One can not simply reinterpreted, but that is nonsense. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Edit: maybe you have After Effects synonymous for disposal?
Antwort von Alf_300:
@ Tuesday \u003cbr /\u003e I'll do so and if you are better then assigns Forward \u003cbr /\u003e Jott has written in another thead that it synonymous with no hardware is nothing special, but what does it matter? If 29 xx exists and is 1080p (probably 1080p24 (23.976 used). \u003cbr /\u003e Perhaps you remember the thread where I still a.Fully engage ect then my video to 120%. there has not changed. ;-)
Antwort von dienstag_01:
Used not 24, but 25p (actually 50i) is. \u003cbr /\u003e Reinterpreted is between 24 and 25 frames, not on the falls. This is not at all. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Edit: 20% difference in time to not fall for you? What's that for a film? A kind of landscape impressions? Ok, since it can be. But I think as you get no tone synonymous adjusted properly. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Edit 2: One can generally say that the conversion of 30 to 24 are a bit easier (with fields) and after 25, there is the pull synonymous.
Antwort von Alf_300:
25p is not with me - then the waer 50i
Antwort von dienstag_01:
It is now time not about you.
Antwort von Alf_300:
I will not Rumstreiten me \u003cbr /\u003e 've Made my suggestion if you want to be fairly fit wenns if not synonymous because other suggestions do not get updated very often.
Antwort von motor-tv:
If there is anyway only SD (PAL) is to be, why not play out similarly and directly to PAL 50i for example? Had the problem but never (or have not even thought 30fps), but an attempt will cost nothing. The TO would have to stop once behold what he has lying around a.Hardware so AV converter, DVD recorders, etc.
Antwort von dienstag_01:
So, let's start at the front of. \u003cbr /\u003e Alf's suggestion, well, I think the gasagt as for non-useful (but you can try). \u003cbr /\u003e In general, to say the conversion is very problematic. Depends very much on the present material from but. That is, if the video contains very little movement, the conversion is less noticeable than if it contains a lot (and it still horizontal) movement. \u003cbr /\u003e Tools that are suitable for the conversion: Adobe After Effects, and (I've only heard) TMPEG. Premiere (and certainly synonymous Magix) do not really get what. With whom (or TMPEG AE) as a first step I would try it to make the conversion in one step and look at that result. There may be synonymous, other programs, but something that should in-the-art high-quality image interpolation
