Frage von Pimmelpirat:
Hello,
280'er is still in the 16 / 9 2.7 "screen really necessary when the 4 / 3 starts because one else has ever left and right, a black bar on the screen of the action. So the picture is smaller than the screen s.der Cam. Maybe the setting s.der Who has experience with it?
Thanks in advance
sj
Antwort von Acer:
You can record in 16 / 9 and in 4 / 3. Widescreen you have more wide angle (read more Picture =) The 4 / 3 your picture on the screen is cropped on the left and right, there is no image information lost by the pruning, in Comparison to 16 / 9 but already.
Ciao;).
Antwort von Ivy:
Exactly! ;-)
Lg,
Ivy
Antwort von Acer:
Why do not register you. No spam mails of slashCAM And you know when we have the pleasure to meet you ;-)
Ciao;).
Antwort von Pimmelpirat:
You can record in 16 / 9 and in 4 / 3. Widescreen you have more wide angle (read more Picture =) The 4 / 3 your picture on the screen is cropped on the left and right, there is no image information lost by the pruning, in Comparison to 16 / 9 but already.
Ciao;). Image Info at 16 / 9 lost. I do not understand completely.
Actually you would need the 2.7 "display at 4 / 3 is not recording, right?
Antwort von Ivy:
I do not understand now, so very ... ;-)
But if you allude to my jar file is added quite nonsensical posting * laughs *, I would like to alert you that an author / in me has specifically asked my opinion about this (see "Panasonic NV-GS 280 at Dixons) And unfortunately I was not fast enough to be the first to respond, but wanted to show with my answer, however, that I responded very well to the request explitzite my person. * lach *
Until then,
Ivy
Antwort von Acer:
You can record in 16 / 9 and in 4 / 3. Widescreen you have more wide angle (read more Picture =) The 4 / 3 your picture on the screen is cropped on the left and right, there is no image information lost by the pruning, in Comparison to 16 / 9 but already.
Ciao;).
Image Info at 16 / 9 lost. I do not understand completely.
Actually you would need the 2.7 "display at 4 / 3 is not recording, right? Ne, ne, at 16 / 9 (widescreen / "movie format") have just more visual information. More chip area is used (more pixels)
The 2.7 "could just as well with 4 / 3 monitor (in the case 4/3-Aufnahmen) I only movies on 16 / 9. ..
Ciao;).
Antwort von Acer:
When I drafted my post (about it, see a) sent off, I wanted to be synonymous, the first * grin *, but then you have already answered and everyone was happy ...;.)
Ciao;).
Antwort von Acer:
Yes already. Was about to order there, but what one hears so there. Ivy you've got these synonymous action. I have a question about the device. Have a new issue presented, with the the 2.7 ". Can you tell it to me? Reply Do you mean the order as an allusion?
Antwort von Pimmelpirat:
You can record in 16 / 9 and in 4 / 3. Widescreen you have more wide angle (read more Picture =) The 4 / 3 your picture on the screen is cropped on the left and right, there is no image information lost by the pruning, in Comparison to 16 / 9 but already.
Ciao;).
Image Info at 16 / 9 lost. I do not understand completely.
Actually you would need the 2.7 "display at 4 / 3 is not recording, right?
Ne, ne, at 16 / 9 (widescreen / "movie format") have just more visual information. More chip area is used (more pixels)
The 2.7 "could just as well with 4 / 3 monitor (in the case 4/3-Aufnahmen) I only movies on 16 / 9. ..
Ciao;). If you only films in 16 / 9, then you have synonymous certainly worth a 16 / 9 Television, right?
Because in a 4 / 3, the picture is so protracted.
PS Yes're right'll need to register once.
Greeting
sj
Antwort von Acer:
Oh yes, also called 2.7 "does not au 16 / 9. inches are just the diagonal. 16 / 9 or 4 / 3, only the aspect ratio to each other as the ...* Info ambiguous title for appointment *
Ciao;).
Antwort von Acer:
If you only films in 16 / 9, then you have synonymous certainly worth a 16 / 9 Television, right?
Because in a 4 / 3, the picture is so protracted.
PS Yes're right'll need to register once.
Greeting
sj Yes, before I had a 4 / 3 monitor, now a 16 / 9 LCD TV. I'm very happy with it. The difference was huge for ollen CRT monitor in 4 / 3. Can I recommend all just ...
Ciao;).
Antwort von Ivy:
Acer, exactly what I meant.
And look: I have logged on. This is my first official post. Tam Tam! Applause! ;-)
Lg,
Ivy
Antwort von Acer:
Acer, exactly what I meant.
What did you mean? Can you still call me Philip, then I better ful * grin *
HIPP, HIPP, HURRAY, and the 3x, he has signed up: o)
Antwort von Acer:
Our guest / questioner has slips away, * * pity, now we have a dialogue ...;.)
Antwort von Pimmelpirat:
Oh yes, also called 2.7 "does not au 16 / 9. inches are just the diagonal. 16 / 9 or 4 / 3, only the aspect ratio to each other as the ...* Info ambiguous title for appointment *
Ciao;). So yes, I think that recording the 2.7 "display with a 4 / 3, almost a bit is unnecessary, because the black side bars.
Antwort von Ivy:
Acer, exactly what I meant.
What did you mean? Well, the allusion. You have posted up next. The others from the thread. Now do not. So wirds gut gradually complicated ... ;-)
Lg,
Ivy
Antwort von Acer:
Oh yes, also called 2.7 "does not au 16 / 9. inches are just the diagonal. 16 / 9 or 4 / 3, only the aspect ratio to each other as the ...* Info ambiguous title for appointment *
Ciao;).
So yes, I think that recording the 2.7 "display with a 4 / 3, almost a bit is unnecessary, because the black side bars. Therefore, 16 / 9 to film much better.
Antwort von Acer:
Now klär me on that hint, I no longer looking through, really
Antwort von sj:
Acer, exactly what I meant.
And look: I have logged on. This is my first official post. Tam Tam! Applause! ;-)
Lg,
Ivy I am so pleased synonymous.
Antwort von Ivy:
Juhuuuuuuuu! ;-) Another launchy!
So that with the allusion was so:
I wrote "Yeah!".
Then you wrote "Why did not actually announce yourself?"
Then I wrote "I know my post was nonsense, but that was because an author of this thread has actually spoken to me."
Then you've copied the quote in which sj asked me to take a position on its thread and asked: "Do you think this allusion?"
And I answered: "Yes, I mean that."
And then chaos broke out.
Lg,
Ivy
Antwort von Acer:
Achso. The
"I meant" has confused me. Would you have "the" written, I know know. this is like the chat room here, huh?
Antwort von sj:
Yes but now no preference.
Again on the action. The lens protection is synonymous quite loud when on it, or approaching (think of the engine). If it is synonymous with you like that?
Antwort von Acer:
This is not so bad, better than a "do-it-with-the-hand-off lens protection." You take the net to ...;.) mechanism indeed
Antwort von sj:
Ok thank you. Until next time.
Greeting
sj
Antwort von Acer:
And so the gallant knight riding to his princess to the castle
