Frage von axel.schultze@t-online.de: November 2006
crap, in turn is great scheiss happens. we have filmed with 2 cameras and accidentally (I know. that may not happen) a cam in 16:9 and 4:3 in the other set. Now let me between pest or cholera select: 1) the video is 4:3 and the 16:9 material trimmed or 2) the video is 16:9 and the 4:3 material stretched. However, this is the mega 4:3 persuasive blurred
both looks pretty bad, but probably I will be for 2nd decide, as the cam 16:9 was significantly better.
do you have another idea or an advice?
I thank you very
Antwort von Markus:
"One guest wrote:
do you have another idea or an advice?
Not really. But because the material must necessarily be scaled so that no black bars are? This could be the final product as a 16:9 - Video arise in the 4:3-shots with black bars left and right to be embedded. The latter loses s.Schärfe somewhat, but not so much as the inflation-Width to 16:9.
The same topic:
Antwort von Uwe:
It must not necessarily synonymous to black borders => they can be colored, totally soft, light with light, soft original clip ... The imagination knows no bounds. But of course, are always last resort ....
Antwort von Nicht eingeloggt:
Professionals decide in case of doubt, for 4:3 letterbox. I see this as synonymous to the lesser of two evils (Sorry for the silly Diphtongs is a travel-PC).
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
Hello, 've ever smaller scenes of 4:3 according to 16:9 conversions can but looked very good! Of poor quality, I can say nothing.
Antwort von darKOR:
Many thanks once. do you really think that it is reasonable, in the 4:3 scenes an edge in the left and right images to show? I've viewed myself again and find it terribly - but perhaps the least bad of all the possibilities. possibly, the very good, if I might still 4:3 persuasive in s / w transformer and the bissel kontrast change. because it is in any case only a few 4:3-cut images in a 15-minute interview, then I did now in this way:
16:9 video with a few cuts 4:3 (s / w, bar left and right).
thanks' you!
Antwort von Markus:
"Not logged in" wrote:
(Sorry for the silly Diphtongs is a travel-PC).
ALT + 0196 = Ä ALT + 0228 = ä ALT + 0214 = Ö ALT + 0246 = ö ALT + 0220 = Ü ALT + 0252 = ü ALT + 0223 = ß
... at least when the German character set is supported. ;-)
Antwort von Alpinist:
"Not logged in" wrote:
In case of doubt, for 4:3 letterbox.
Would I make now synonymous. One sees in many reports, vswenn current recordings (16:9) with older (4:3) are combined (eg, History Channel & Co). The question is rather the target medium. If a standard TV set should be, then 4:3 (ie letterbox), otherwise at the 4:3 shots around Blake is black, hence the 4:3 natively displayable Picture significantly downscaled will unnecessarily ind ...
Depending on the image content must be transported, I would preferably be synonymous for the 16:9 format (with unscaled 4:3 between) to decide, but only if a DVD is issued and the 16:9 material properly with the correct aspect ratio used is. If the material is sent to 4:3, and therefore create the video in 16:9 letterbox by proceedings in the video content in 4:3 are included, they appear with bereavement edge, ie top, bottom, left and right black borders. This can be seen repeatedly in various channels. Therefore one can only answer your question, if you know what content your video shows and on what medium you are ausgibst.
If you decide but should be 16:9, which is synonymous possibility that 4:3 material decentered s.den edge to slide. Perhaps even prune and the unused part of the picture with something else to fill. Graphics, still or video image running. A cartoon-like outline style is another way to old recordings 4:3 involved. I then proceeds with projects mainly in HD have been rotated, but where old 4:3 SD material to be mixed.
