Frage von Tobias Claren:
Hello.
What you should understand the 25P cinema mode to use?
Are there any good reasons?
What would be with a wedding? Is not an action movie or sports.
Regards,
Clare Tobias
Antwort von yeah:
Pure taste. My taste would not. Maximum at very low light to even step out of a diaphragm. In normal light rather counter-productive, because now the Aperture to be closed next.
In addition, "Cinema mode" is not. Movies is 24 frames / second. Although Sony, for example, this shit "Cineframe called (even have a large Sony) is not true.
Not convinced? Just try it.
Antwort von Tobias Claren:
So even keinne reason for this mode as the Canon HG10?
Should I not be behind the video came to edit?
Or coming from the camera already out 1080p? Also, the file is available on the PC plays in 1080p?
1080i looks on the PC wiedergegeen markedly worse than 1080p.
Except with DVD player software, such as NVidia PureVideoHD supported.
But maybe it will be synonymous times on a BD secure.
And then there will be someone with a 08/15-BD-Player play.
So never in 25 P-Mode (or 24p) film?
But afterwards improved? If yes, how?
Or do we as synonymous to the nature of the filmed disconnect (wedding?)?
Antwort von yeah:
Kinomodusgetue This is my Meiung after Werbeunfug just as stupid as the 100 000 times zoom (digital).
Lowlight For 25p may be good, but otherwise not really.
And here as synonymous n-fold already mentioned, movies look very little with the camera to do, but rather with the world and besides the camera ... but do nothing with the framerate. Or is it for you in the most important movies that are badly made jerky images?
Canon HF100 has 25p I think something better spatial resolution, which could very quiet recordings perhaps 25p-use motivation.
Antwort von yeah:
--
Or coming from the camera already out 1080p? Also, the file is available on the PC plays in 1080p? Off camera, if they do not FullHD dominated, very safe only 1080/50i out. Typically, this information can be found in the manual.
Antwort von Axel:
My usual statement (sigh) as a notorious proponent 25p. Frames are prettier. With "quiet recording" is not a difference to see, with Lowlight has just as little to do with cinema look, that's all nonsense stop loose. But undaunted next claimed. Try both modes, and pick the one you like better.
Antwort von PowerMac:
The supposedly improved sensitivity comes from the fact that 25p in love with a 1/25s shutter of exposure and was in fact brighter than with a shutter of 1/50s. 1/25s is just unfortunately wrong. Unless there is a vomiting effect of the viewer as desired.
Antwort von DeeZiD:
Dear 25 clean frames than 50 badly set up fields <<- My opinion!
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von Markus:
Dear 25 clean frames than 50 badly set up fields The decision in the first instance the cameraman and not just a recording format.
What you should understand the 25P cinema mode to use?
Are there any good reasons? 25p makes sense then, for example, if the only output progressive picture is to be made, for example in the production of Internet videos. In this case, one saves the deinterlacing and can be finer Articles and incorporate graphic elements, with the interlaced video would be unthinkable.
Antwort von Klaus Zimmer:
Dumm nachgehakt - If I, therefore, exclusively via the Web, PC, synonymous times Beamer (not HD) it - that is definitely not on TV or on DVD will output - 25p makes sense?
Antwort von mr.cliff:
Dear 25 clean frames than 50 badly set up fields blafasel
The image quality of the final result depends on so really did not. Go, play with your Aiptek.
Antwort von Axel:
Dumm nachgehakt - If I, therefore, exclusively via the Web, PC, synonymous times Beamer (not HD) it - that is definitely not on TV or on DVD will output - 25p makes sense? In reality, yes deinterlacer for subsequent Webfilme no
problem. What about Mark wrote the fine structures, but it is not only to subsequently inserted graphics or fonts. We are accustomed to contrasting vertical lines are not clean out to see. It is a characteristic of this field technique, and regardless of with which device is being played. Not tragic.
The characteristics of 25 frames on the other hand, is here again and again emphasized: The lollop of the image in motion. With 25p, there is only one shutter speed, which makes sense, namely 1/50tel second. In 25/tel begin to blur images in 1/100tel seen it already bucking. The standard exposure time of an analogue film camera with 24 fps is 1/48tel second. That and
only that guarantees enough motion blur to consecutive frames to stick together. The automatic transmission of "p" Shear-enabled cameras are not around it. When recording in Hellen is mercilessly shortened the exposure time, and here the defendant Strobo effect occurs.
If "i" with 1/100tel recordings with "p" recordings with 1/50tel made under the same conditions and under the same conditions are compared, it is
not possible, at moderately moving subjects to see a difference. In fast movements, we see significant differences. What you will find even better that you should choose ...
Antwort von Tobias Claren:
Where should the output as interlaced done?
LCD TVs have progressive playback.
Whether LCD TV or PC monitor is no preference.
And s.einem old PAL TV you see it eh of a well-made medium.
If there is a PAL outputs, then you should get out as 567i.
Otherwise it is always a PAL version.
For example, a DVD.
When should you ever so the material remains interlaced display?
Antwort von Axel:
OT to Anglicisms: Words from English are adopted. "Make sense" I find scarce and beautiful as "meaningless" but "useful" would be an alternative. What I think is really problematic is "interlaced". German declines have it "interlacedt" or "interlacet" hot, but it is similarly stupid like "outgesourcet", it is ugly.
Where should the output as interlaced done?
LCD TVs have progressive playback. The deinterlacer in LCD or plasma TVs are not all equally good. This applies to the purchase of its own device, but is also more of a point "p". As far as I know, but the 50 stages is always preserved.
Whether LCD TV or PC monitor is no preference. The no. Almost all software players are only 25 stages which, by default, with the method "Interweave" (both fields are displayed on top of each other). It looks at "original size" shitty, if the viewer the picture scaled, there are lines of salad. Only the software DVD player (the missing hyphen is a Anglicism) deinterlace properly, but also with significant loss of quality compared to frames.
And s.einem old PAL TV you see it eh of a well-made medium.
If there is a PAL outputs, then you should get out as 567i.
Otherwise it is always a PAL version. For example, a DVD. In order to limit the confusion: Pal is technically "i". However, if both fields of a frame at one time, it is
synonymous of "25p". That is no other version. " The days when the line tube devices are not fast enough were able to build - the birth of the half - has been passé. That is why progressive images are universally usable. If there were no LCD, plasma or computer ...
Antwort von flipmo:
The survivors continue to live anonymously and post only as guests. Yep.
Deinterlacer: s.besten to see that you have your picture - if for television - initially for the tube optimierst. The broadcasters seem synonymous still to be done ;-)
In a few years, the cards are shuffled, perhaps: perhaps fall then yes synonymous old bastions like overscan ...
Antwort von Markus:
Parallel discussion outsourced:
Antwort von flipmo:
The survivors continue to live anonymously and post only as guests.
Yep.
Deinterlacer: s.besten to see that you have your picture - if for television - initially for the tube optimierst. The broadcasters seem synonymous still to be done ;-)
In a few years, the cards are shuffled, perhaps: perhaps fall then yes synonymous old bastions like overscan ... That would be absolutely desirable.
Those who prefer more motion information takes 720p/50p
Those who prefer more visual information takes 1080p/25p
It is that simple (or so it should be easy). Interlace today just always makes sense and is less depending on the deinterlacer just simply mirror-cracking or ugly: D
Gruß Dennis
Antwort von flipmo:
Interlace today just always makes less sense and is (...) You do not accidentally upset someone?
;-))))))))
