Frage von Hans:
Hello,
I'm with my 3-chip PAL DV camcorder material filmed and cut. S.TV The movement is smooth, since there is so 50 fields. If we now make mp4 and wmv files with 25 progressive images for an Internet video of it, then it is jerky in certain passages, such as zooming and panning. This problem is known to me synonymous. What I must now consider when shooting that happened not more so. The zooming and panning with the camcorder, incidentally, were slow. Why such trailers of Hollywood movies or videos on the Internet are synonymous so smooth in the movement, although they often use less than 25 frames, and include some very fast movements?
I would like to say that the jerk at a Resolutionvon 320x240 (1 / 4 VGA) is not very noticeable. But then it renders the video in VGA size (640x480), then jerky is enormous. Maybe im looking for tips and ready? Gleichmal Thanks in advance.
753-AT-gmx.net
Antwort von Nathanjo:
: Hi,
I'm with my 3-chip PAL DV camcorder material filmed and cut. The
: S.TV motion is smooth, since there is so 50 fields. If we now make mp4 and
: Wmv files with 25 progressive images for an Internet video of it, then it jerky
: In certain passages, such as zooming and panning. This issue to me is synonymous
: Unknown. What I must now consider when shooting that happened not more so. The
: Zooms and pans with the camcorder, incidentally, were slow. Why are such trailer
: Synonymous of Hollywood movies or videos on the Internet so smooth in the movement,
: Although often less than 25 frames, and use some very fast
: Include movements?
I would like to say that the jerk at a Resolutionvon 320x240 (1 / 4 VGA)
: Not very noticeable. But then it renders the video in VGA size (640x480), then
: Jerky is enormous. Maybe im looking for tips and ready? Thanks
: Gleichmal in advance.
The only reason I can think of for the explanation of such observation is a higher motionblur. Otherwise, I can not at the observation actually share, I've noticed has never been so strong.
MfG,
Nathanjo
