Frage von TMaekler:
Hello,
I am currently looking for an adapter for film-look, ie Depth of Field. As a camera, we use the XM-1, and there are here in the forum and on the Internet so more than enough Mögichkeiten something with adapters to realize - but unfortunately not for the XM.1.
One here knows whether the existing adapter from P + S and Redrock (or another provider) synonymous s.die XM-1 match?
Thank you,
Torsten
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
I am currently looking for an adapter for film-look, ie Depth of Field. Even wrong! Forum Search!
Antwort von Axel:
You wrong. You can use any adapter. The XM-1 which has a filter thread? 58mm or so? For this you need a transition ring. Ask at the respective manufacturer, but it fit all.
Smaller Camobjektive are even better suited, and when you do 4:3, it is even better.
Antwort von TMaekler:
I am currently looking for an adapter for film-look, ie Depth of Field.
Even wrong! Forum Search! Hmmm, you need to write here that you have two hours searching the forum behind it?
You wrong. You can use any adapter. The XM-1 which has a filter thread? 58mm or so? For this you need a transition ring. Ask at the respective manufacturer, but it fit all.
Smaller Camobjektive are even better suited, and when you do 4:3, it is even better. Yes, 58mm. Thanks, I try 'my luck times.
Antwort von PowerMac:
I am currently looking for an adapter for film-look, ie Depth of Field.
Even wrong! Forum Search!
Hmmm, you need to write here that you have two hours searching the forum behind it? (...) It already passed, would be seen if that thou depth look blur and film could keep apart! And not just sat! That does not bother and that you are looking for an adapter.
Antwort von Axel:
A 35mm adapter looks just because of the use is for many - and seemingly synonymous for TMaekler - obvious, but it is actually a misunderstanding. A small DOF merely extends the possibilities to identify the motive. At the same time he
is forcing you to look a certain, namely a blur, which makes it difficult to take pictures without dazwischenzuschneiden adapter. So it
forces you to work synonymous manner, with much more patience and care required as usual.
For the target, the subject is out, there are alternatives. When the film is small DOF free, film people still remember most of these options (and there are long, not all "rules of art", which contribute to better pictures). I quote myself from another thread:
- The background weaker than illuminate the subject.
- The background brighter than illuminate the subject.
- A set highlight (bright light oblique contour of the back)
- In the Postpro a slightly blurred vignette to determine the motive.
- Vordergr. and wallpaper. with different color temperature (Rossini)
- General talk by contrasting colors
- In the composition the motif prominently identified
- The subject with the camera monitor. The background is determined by motion blur geblurrt.
- Open Aperture, teleconferencing and distance of subject and background
- With a fog machine the space tidy einnebeln
- An actor who intensively across, makes the establishment of secular room alone for the minor matter (Al Pacino may be synonymous between Yuccapalme Billy shelf and points, with a Einchipper filmed while uncle Jörg tiefenunscharfen on the Set of The Godfather will tell us nothing ... ) One of the points where video of the film, is the lower contrast range of video. Below and above a certain excitement in the electronic scanning differences are ironed smooth, the areas remain without drawing. Deep Black (0/0/0) and pure white (256/256/256) are also s.beiden ends of the spectrum by about 15 shades trimmed (16-235, I believe) because they are in PAL colorspace not properly displayed will. The trick, drawing in all areas to obtain the scaling of the aperture scale on the area that can display video. This can be very costly with gray and light meter (for scenic work go this route) and a bit easier by Remember the Zebra.
Nothing is so krass "video look" like overdriven heights.
