One has the possibility of cutting some programs, a so-called "time remapping" way.
My cam can record 25p and 50i. Am I the scenes that I want to play in a weak SlowMo better record in 50i or 25p and Time remapping and then time remapping. If the quality is better in 50i then I would prefer to have, or hold it move when I rotate a scene where I know I would like to slow it down.
Antwort von Axel:
This is not a question that can be answered flush. First, time-remapping is not necessarily a clean effect. Then he noticed as the effect, he may be synonymous imho stage, ie stutterer. You get with 25f. Is it to be smoother, 50i advantageous. Should 50i deinterlaced to 25p but later - with no preference whether a software or playing on a progressive machine - is the Resolutionder pictures then a little worse than with 25p.
The decision you can remove the ninth, but easier:) Mache (all contact with "M" or "Tv" 1/50tel test shots with shutter:
1. Camera on Tripod, make wave-wave, sometimes in "i" times in "f".
2. Moving with a steady hand as camera and WW-setting around the room slowly, in "i" and then "f".
3. From Tripod slow (and I mean slowly) a road with moving cars swirl about.
All this on the Calculator do not compare (in this case does "i" always look like crap), but via component of the camera to a TV.
You then compare the results critically. Both have advantages and disadvantages, such as sweet and sour, you will not be able to rename them first, but you will able to distinguish them. Finally, it is a matter of taste. Decisions according to your personal preference. Perhaps it is synonymous for one or the other "opportunities" (slow motion have the best hand with "i", but SW was synonymous to be good, keyword AAE or so).
Antwort von lilbarby:
"Axel" wrote:
All this on the Calculator do not compare (in this case does "i" always look like crap)
I can not confirm ... The playback quality is absolutely from the use of deinterlace-kind in the software player. The VLC player has a rich assortment s.deinterlacern example, so that one can always choose the right one.
Antwort von WoWu:
But it is already impossible if you are only "a right" must choose, just to get a perfect picture.
And no interlacer eliminates the systemic Chromafehler, no preference how good he is. What was once developed as analog data reduction has not been long in time. We hope to soon 1080p50.
