Frage von Heinrich123:
Regard! New.
From entry 57 on Talkshow followfocus DIY
Pilskopf had uploaded at Post20 about my poor HD quality beschwert.Hatte MPEG4 with 2000kbit/sec. Many were watching in HD Artefaken.
Onload Tip of Pilskopf File with 6000kbit/sec
Axel then posted ne Instructions for Compressor. Post No.26
Here are the results
2000 version mpeg4
Mark2 6000s version of H264
This possibility of comparison, I did not want to subject yourself.
Especially when the boys pay attention synonymous kite flying. Since it is extremely
So I'm thrilled. Although Youtube makes much kaput by the compression. In the original H264 fly away. And at a reduction of the original 5GB file to 145 MB H264
Hello I had the time on vacation Mark2 test.
I liked the pictures of the broadcast very well.
Had fought on the other, but Page synonymous with the weaknesses.
Fortunately, there are alleviated by now the UPDATE, the worst weaknesses.
The film is made only with the Mark2.
But I made synonymous already 2 projects where I have composed EX1 and Mark2. Actually went quite well.
Lenses When I used the 24-105 and a 50mm fixed focal length.
Now I hope that you will not tear the film too much :-))
As I said were just the first attempts at walking closer.
Antwort von domain:
Nicely done, but liked the colors I do not particularly. Yellow, red and skin tones are good but blue and green are my opinion and although consistently shown more blunt about the entire video.
Or is it caused by Youtube?
A screen shot from your video
Comparison to a video snapshot of the JVC HD40, although I am certainly of the opinion that their colors are already hard s.der border to kitsch :-)
The picture is not processed until the size.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Domain
Some part. Youtubekompression just makes the colors a bit mushy.
I think so. Especially in my eyes is green, often really good.
Perhaps I convert makes synonymous with what is wrong?
If there someone has a good tip, I would be grateful.
For the 2nd Have I made any color correction.
As was already discussed in appropriate fora on the FArblook the 5D. Some are inspired others reject it.
I think a little color correction would have done well.
Otherwise, thanks for the "nicely done" is indeed almost a compliment :-))
PS Your blue is shining :-))
Antwort von domain:
Can you specifically change the colors in some really Mark2 profiles, so that a white balance would produce slightly different colors? Namely, it looks as if the shots consistently had a slight reddish tint. If this could be eliminated, would the colder colors are a bit better and more intense to bear. Straight green and blue colors are very common in nature, yes.
In heaven, come with you partially shadowed prior horizontal upward in the manner of a Grauverlauffilters. Since I'm pretty sure that you led her on purpose Herbei already at the Studio or in the NLE. Is that synonymous for some strong vignetting?
Antwort von gunman:
Hello,
Good done! In some places you have fairly strong vignetting in the corners. Is that the hood was ...?
I do not think sound bad, I aer perhaps a little too "sad" - so when the weather is nice, beach, landscapes and people, but is certainly a matter of taste.
Respect.
Gunman
Antwort von Axel:
As is taste of the speech: This is synonymous only a few steps away of the "cinematic" trinkets, is wont to be tested with the Canon 5D Mark2 otherwise.
I found the red poppies in an otherwise how easily desaturated box very nice, but what does that mean? It expresses a longing?
The camera is now synonymous film, the photographer, it just needs to learn.
And since the film is called
colors of southern France, do I give domain law. Even with this compact camera has to be large differences in brightness per filter. In many scenes there is too little drawing to make it in the postpro still crunchy, an exposure problems, with the very cheap and snapping their automatic tendency would have been avoided earlier.
Conclusion: The big plus is the low depth of field.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Domain.
Good observed.
Yes, I have set up a Grauverlauffilter.
But not consistently. (; Had it not always with this)
The Vigentierung is of the sun visor.
I've only noticed during dubbing. On
the camera monitor will not grant as much during daylight hours.
I thought the whole movie then ne Vigentierung give,
I was then but too much of the Effect.
Hello GUNMAN: The music was composed and recorded myself.
Is a bit of my direction, the Melachonische.
Axel quite rightly observes, the red poppy as the whole film is to document the longing for the South of France. I think it is clear from the language and images. Or am I wrong?
What you had done differently?
I'm always open to constructive criticism.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Oh what I wanted to write.
It seemed important not only synonymous with images of extreme depth of the course as we otherwise often seen films of the Mark2 install, but compose synonymous consistently sharp, or at least weitgehenst sharp images.
I think the possibility of the shallow depth of field can not be an end in itself but must be a design element that will be used selectively. Here I like to admit that I was there one or two times too much in love with the pictures.
But is nice if you can develop next to :-))
PS I am looking forward that the recent posts were so constructive.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The quality looks at me besoinders good and sharp from. How did you upload it? With what bit rate the video was compressed?
Antwort von Axel:
Axel quite rightly observes, the red poppy as the whole film is to document the longing for the South of France. I think it is clear from the language and images. Or am I wrong?
What you had done differently? It would have been next tragedy, the camera would have been merely a photo function. There are so set slideshow Programs, which can be unsuccessful, Music, timings, transitions and Ken Burns animations. This is your video: a slideshow.
If nostalgia is the theme that are securely attached and Impressions (voltage, or at least Dynamics) expression, as it has recognized as an evaluation criterion for Hitchcock
movie, inappropriate. Therefore, it is not a criticism, merely an observation that the whole thing is totally unfilmisch.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The video is simply no s.Zusammenhängen. The absence of a line that the whole thing to make one. There are too different images pasted together, but together make no sense.
But every start is difficult sau that comes with the years and after 20 Shooting Of all alone. : D make videos is much more difficult than to snap photos.
The horses with the DOF shots I found beautiful, this is great. Unfortunately, the video quality is not shared None specific, which could indeed be an SD resolution, but as I've already seen quite badly much better videos of the action. Is it 720p? If so, you have taken ne bitrate of 2000 or less? Lad of the times with a 6000s high bit rate to MP4 720p. Otherwise, there must be somewhere an error occurs.
Or maybe use Vimeo, eh much better than Youtube.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Pilskopf
Yes had with 2000 bitrate compressed (; Compressor)
6000 the then loads fast enough over the Net or I see that somehow wrong?
Antwort von pilskopf:
I do I thought. 2000 is really rubbish and you can see that very clearly. Of course, the load goes afloat, your video is not even 20 minutes. Video quality is really important, and the artifacts remind a s.Handyfotos. You ne ProfiCAM, make something of it, the audience will thank you. So check it out with 6000.
Pay for your next vacation that you insert more long shots, then you can go into detail synonymous. (In the small alley, for example, Picture) is too high and off-center because I want to have a reference as the village looks like, as do the gates of the city has a recording, possibly even of a mountain. Look at times on TV documentaries, it's always a similar pattern, you will see there is no detailed record of the prior is not a long shot. Always find a relation of (one scene to another; The poppies did you get this done synonymous). There is none, building a slow black aperture and no direct Cutten.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Will heed your advice.
But what is funny. Without HD it looks better than in the HD mode.
In HD mode, at normal stupid Artefaken looks pretty good?
How did that happen?
I chose 720p.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Before rendering, or even in the original way? But ultimately I can not help anyway because I do not know Cam and probably synonymous not your editing program, but if you ever say with what you cut, you will help the very competent Axel.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
No no, in the original, it is great!
Very beautiful HD quality.
Only on Youtube, it is the way it is.
I use FC for the cut.
Antwort von Axel:
The Slashcam deti it was had, I think the times extensive testing for upload-download vimeoHD and youtubeHD made. Conclusion: Regardless of which data rate with the upload took place, the video was always re-encoded and then streamed with ~ 2000.
But a high data rate provides the respective encoder obviously better starting material.
Lost Blog From the tip to provide a clip
before encoding with lightweight digital sharpness.
From Slashcam experts WoWu of cheap gold tip how to do it against pixel blocks, pixel clouds in fuzzy or dark spots: the entire video
prior to encoding with a slight grain (; a quasi-layer digital sharpness) provided.
Before you upload the 6000 version, you can test how far the clip of each video portal is botched: (clip from the 6000s, not to export from the original)
quick & dirty one 2000 version. In finetune visible artifacts with the above-mentioned tricks.
Concerning Final Cut Pro / Compressor: I do not think that all these different media encoder very doll.
Antwort von pilskopf:
So if I upload with 2000 and with 6000, as different as day and night. I think my videos perfectly adequate with almost no artifacts, and always highly invite to MP4 720p and 5500 or 6000th
I doubt synonymous, so great that Vimeo recoded. Like yesterday when I upload a file with 320 MB, there is still the same size. Vimeo When the newly compressed, then the file should not be synonymous smaller? Although the compress again even after the upload but I guess that will be optimized more easily.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Pilskopf: And in Youtube? As you see from there vids?
Haste mal a link to your films?
Antwort von pilskopf:
This is not shared with ner bitrate of 6000, the example is synonymous nearly equal to the original, which was no better. : D Can you say yes synonymous same time whether you like too long loads.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Yes, under true HD looks very good.
Get your tip to heart and upload times synonymous with 6000th
Ah, yes: the ranges of 16:9 is not synonymous shrill :-))
Antwort von pilskopf:
Ne. I do not even stand on the format. : D I just got ne sau Focal small, almost has too much cut all the Wide Angleund. Otherwise looks kacke. On the other hand, I prefer so ne Focal, we see just what it synonymous.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
What haste for a preview monitor?
still looking for something good not too expensive.
Antwort von pilskopf:
I only have a limited budget material, I'm just a small preview LCD 3cm off s.der Cam. : D Ridiculous small, clear, with your gscheit you ever need anything for the sharpness.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Just so we do not forget what we want to talk
:-))
Antwort von pilskopf:
Yeah, we're waiting for the 6000-bit version. : D
Greeting
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello.
So now I have a problem or I'm stupid.
Wanted to create a File in Compressor with the 6000 bitrate of Pilskopf mentioned as MPEG4
If I could go into default, he offers me, but only a max of 2045.
I Do something wrong? Who can help.
Antwort von Axel:
Compressor, the
Preferences window has three icons under the
Preferences tab. The right one is a "+". By clicking you can duplicate the currently selected preset, the prerequisite for being able to edit it. The list is now something like: H.264Kopie. Double-clicking on it opens the default. The second tab with the name of
coders. See Attachment. As I have just found ourselves remains the "quality" at 75%, if you confine the data rate. If you choose the other hand, "Automatic", post them postmaster to 100%. Hmm. Later, back up the default.
EDIT: Just checked. To limit the data rate to 6000, at 75% quality, probably is in order. Curiously, then, the average effective rate of 7967.72 kbits / s. If "auto" and 100% quality but at an imposing 21.98 Mbit / s (; Source: HDV). Good to know.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Axel.
In H264, I had many times the problem with upload on Youtube.
Brach always after about half an hour.
In mpeg4 no problem.
Do I get to the 6000 synonymous with MPEG 4?
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Axel saving you the trouble.
Has worked with H264 and 6000kbit/sec.
Needed some time (, 1 1 / 2 hours)
For the Comparison of the quality I will open a new topic so that the information is not synonymous for other sets.
For this is certainly interesting for many.
1000 thanks again for the help and s.Dich synonymous s.Pilsi!
Antwort von Heinrich123:
've Just decided to change the subject and referring to shut Post
Antwort von Axel:
Are they with you after the export actually 6000 kbit / s? As always synonymous, if you have uploaded the film, let me know.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Axel.
6000 version is up.
See link in first post at the top.
With 6000 I have uploaded. What has turned it into a Youtube then I do not know.
Where you see the?
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Here are the results
2000 version mpeg4
6000s version of H264
Antwort von deti:
Plaintext: 2Mbit / s are gruesome, 6Mbit / s are in order.
In scenes such as one held at 0:15 blades of grass and shrubs provides only mud. Presumably, at 2Mbit / s, the YouTube for HD video for its use, not a higher level of detail in animated scenes inside.
Deti
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Yes, I think synonymous.
I have recommended the set 6000kbit/sec and 75% quality.
Possibly. Bring 100% quality and 21mbit/sec something else. The question is how big is the file and extends the rest of my life up to onload the file? :-))
Antwort von deti:
YouTube anyway, since only 2 Mbps in H.264 for HD video uses ranging 6Mbit / s for the delivery of fully minimize the transcoding losses.
Deti
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Yes, I think I can live synonymous with the good quality!
How smooth is the playback of the videos are in HD?
What did you do for a line?
Antwort von pilskopf:
So this way can the quality can be seen. Did you at least feel that it is HD. For me, it loads normally quick to load no problem at all this.
Now you have to put more s.The color correction. : D
Antwort von deti:
Yes, I think I can live synonymous with the good quality!
Will you, unless you Hoste your videos yourself ;-)
How smooth is the playback of the videos are in HD?
What did you do for a line? Under Linux, it comes just choppy, but under Windows and MacOS without problems. The playback of HD video should work cleanly s.2Ghz dual core CPU.
Director: 1Gbit / s from the workplace to the router, Internet connectivity 10Gbit / s (no, this is no joke).
Deti
Antwort von Heinrich123:
10GB WOW !!!!!! Not bad
So for me this conference has great worth.
I learned what to do so.
I did not deal with HD set so hard because my customers have with SD (; DVD) were satisfied.
Another question looking for a good one (; affordable) Preview Monitor.
Is there anyone a hint? (; Color correction?)
Noch ne question: How do I get the HD quality to the customer?
HD television but he has playing media? / Burning like with what?
I read once synonymous the FC / Mac will not describe Bleurays?
I know a lot of questions
Antwort von Axel:
... I read once synonymous the FC / Mac will not describe Bleurays? DVD Studio Pro only supports the dead HD-DVD, and the synonymous of burning her only if you have an HD-DVD drive with burners that are no longer produced.
With Toast you can burn with a - external or internal - Bluray drive a movie on disc, no authoring, auto-start.
With Adobe Encore (; synonymous Mac) you can then dazupacken synonymous menus. The compatibility of the discs is similar to the first question, as with standalone DVD players at that stage.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Color correction is only through your eyes I would say. My Prog Magix correction is just a normal color to edit the individual colors too, I use a Virtual Dub which dominates the filter. The better and more expensive because Progis have easier ways to do so.
If your like me the red Vid not simply outshines that you kannnst with simple means to make homogeneous.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Thanks Axel!
You have Brennst on HD DVDs or distribute you still?
I mean is already absurd. Since wahnsinn quali and then s.auf DVD haste to SD.
Pilzi: I thought a useful monitor for
Assessment of color correction.
FC has been very ne viable correction option.
In the film, I have very deliberately wanted flashy colors. Simply the Colors.
But you're right, the Mohnblumenrot is very strong!
Antwort von Axel:
Noch ne question: How do I get the HD quality to the customer?
HD television but he has playing media? / Burning like with what?
I read once synonymous the FC / Mac will not describe Bleurays The film could be transferred on a USB flash drive, 8 GB's available at discount for under 10 ¬, 16 GB for under 20 ¬. A suitable player could be synonymous jump on it, for safety. By customer request, that he will film on a Bluray player has to run, so that's standard, the compatibility issue to be clarified. I would look for in a USB compatibility to the movie on BD specification, for example, where there are no 108025p.
Here I am hanging with my views on the question whether a German reference book a la
BD demystified is known for the Basics?
Funny the way that it slashcam the editorial was not yet achieved it, open the Book Bluray attached to ...
Antwort von Heinrich123:
You practice the way? Your customers want HD?
Antwort von Axel:
I get the crumbs of my full-time self-employed colleagues, when there were weddings, company parties and things like that. They wanted, in fact, much earlier than the HD bands for music videos, corporate videos for the Net's fair or movies. Synonymous but that has changed completely in recent months. Yes, the USB stick is my choice, at present But even in addition to standard DVD, the quality is not blatantly under a BD to be placed. The keyword is 1080p upscaling, which many stand-alone DVD player (do very well, better than the LCDs and plasma). Unfortunately, it is not economical, given to a bride and groom to the DVD player like the synonymous ;-)))
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Axel Preview Monitor with whom you are working?
Antwort von pilskopf:
There is a special kind of panel, which is good for image editing. Ask me not iwe now called, is substantially more expensive than the normal TFTs. Yes I know, not really help next. : D
Antwort von Axel:
I have not calibrated monitor. I did not even have a Full HD monitor. When I bought my Samsung SyncMaster 223BW, which cost even more than his third FullHD successors.
All of these monitors are 16:10 and not have 50 Hz frequency. It is a matter of professional claim, as it assesses the. The same applies even synonymous for monitor speakers. The next step would probably
Eizo, more precise, I can not tell you. This topic has been discussed in the forum very often. The Conclusion is, as you can imagine: Quality costs money.
As evidence that the colors are set on the Samsung quite well, I guess I was satisfied with them so far on all other output devices. I was a little uncertain with the gamma value. The picture appeared on all the other devices a bit too dark. This was how I found out - not least thanks to this forum - Mac s.dem s.den custom gamma value of 1.8, the sets are better at 2.2. This shows that the assessment is subjective and relative: If the monitor is
too bright, it makes the picture
too dark. I have not the slightest idea why is the factory setting up a Mac so, because (in direct Comparison, System Preferences> Displays> colors are> Calibration> gamma) by toggling a 1.8 only faint milky ago. Does anyone know it?
The guarantee to have a completely neutral presentation that would be nice, and a luxury. The same applies to the assessment of the tone. The level of quality increases linearly step-arithmetic, the price exponentially.
More important than a high-end system is the awareness of the problem and the consistent use with the various expedients.
Antwort von pilskopf:
There is a problem with a perfect monitor. It makes the colors so how it will look good and are correspondingly realistic. But now the whole community, or the customer who comes every 300 ¬ TFTs, and watch a correspondingly unnatural picture even though you did everything right. Otherwise you'll get ne tube as a control, which are still better than a new color TFT. Everything is not so easy.
Antwort von Axel:
There is a problem with a perfect monitor. It makes the colors so how it will look good and are correspondingly realistic. But now the whole community, or the customer who comes every 300 ¬ TFTs, and watch a correspondingly unnatural picture even though you did everything right. Turns out to be less tragic. Anyone who has totally screwed up his monitor and be happy as a blue picture with a blue sunglasses looks (one was reminded s.Duckula), this fiasco is accustomed to speak and calibrated for the false color. He will recognize a well-corrected Picture synonymous with his delusion through. And what is more, in the known good payment practice for videography services I have in front of the decrease Calculator made - before I - a habit. Improvements cost nothing, they take place in the presence of the customer. Then there's coal, or a movie. Payable upon delivery. Recommended.
Otherwise you'll get ne tube as a control, which are still better than a new color TFT. And are often very cheap. However, they then usually no way to properly display a 16:9 picture. They start with used at 700 ¬. Possibly. But this is (in square pixels, ie for you) no problem. I do not know exactly, but I think the older models lack only a "squeeze" function.
In the FullHD the 5D Mark2 but I do not know if that was such a sense. Who watches still in the tube? Calibrated (; or "reasonably calibrated") TFT seems to me better.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello you two.
Thank you for responding to you with the topic you monitor apart.
My reasoning is.
A television or PC monitor for preview.
Incidentally Pilskopf since I've seen your Staydicamaufnahmen suddenly the question is no longer monitor the Prio.
Where should I choose to do so.
My 5D with Lens weighs ca.1600 grams
Glidecam 1000 or 2000?
Antwort von pilskopf:
The HD-2000, possibly with so ner Armhalterung. But do not forget one, the less the weight, it will be smoother with such a system, the manual recording.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
You're the expert
If I had problem with that, I will contact s.dich :-))
Did you mean the 2000 is still reasonably portable?
Antwort von pilskopf:
That, in any case, it will be tantamount to 3 pounds total weight, possibly slightly less. There is such a Armbrace for it or how they call that puts the weight on the whole arm, which could be helpful. Ich habs with such a weight does not really work and why you would not envy. : D
But you can indeed with the Glidecam filmed not only in running special synonymous to clean pans, use it as a tripod, and you do not have to unpack it first, stand up, adjust, which goes much more smoothly with a Glidecam.
Antwort von Clemensch:
hello s.alle!
Just wanted to say what monitor calibration.
You can make a relatively easy to monitor true color setting:
http://www.xrite.com/product_overview.aspx?ID=788
Perhaps that helps one or the other.
beautiful grülße
Clemens
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Thank you for the tip
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Mal ne other question has anyone know of this Folwfocus.
So the adjustment of manual focus via the scroll wheel.
Where can I get her as a bevel gear.
Have a Mattebox with rods and would like to mount anything like this turn.
Is there a specialist among you?
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Times googled and I found this link.
What do you think?
http://follow-focus.de/Willkommen.html
Antwort von Axel:
Times googled and I found this link.
What do you think?
http://follow-focus.de/Willkommen.html Salut,
why not a new thread? Having
these
Good workmanship, virtually no game, very good price.
Disadvantage: No extension should be proposed times. But if you already own just pull the sharpness (; shoulder rig), no preference ...
PS: you have concerns that by the sprockets that stretches you to the Lenses, whose diameter is significantly increased. The result is that the distance must be greater to the rods. Eventually, a "riser" is needed ....
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Hello Axel.
As always, competent!
Thanks for the reply.
This means that you know personally this product.
What are the delivery?
Antwort von Axel:
This means that you know personally this product.
What are the delivery? If he has in stock, you've got one, two days later. Call for consideration. It is aware that the Cinecity followfocus is cheaper. I have nothing against these Indians, things got even a few synonymous (; Rods, Flycam). Where it is not just stability but mainly to mechanical precision, I would not risk's.
Antwort von Heinrich123:
Who selbstgebaut such a thing before?
Components from where?
When I hand the other guys are very clever just need a reasonable instructions!
