Newsmeldung von slashCAM:\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von MrDizzle:
that people always trust even in the location, should be the next to the Oberbaumbruecke suck out most location here :)
Antwort von B.DeKid:
What was now the Red Epic good / necessary? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Best regards \u003cbr /\u003e B. DeKid
Antwort von mannamanna:
Great clip, great tracking shot - so yes ruecken "Touch of Evil" moderate camera movement in tangible near (as an alternative to the otherwise necessary for Wahnsinnskraenen :-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e youtube = Yg8MqjoFvy4 \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e mannma
Antwort von rakzak:
I cool finds synonymous. Also because it is used quite organically, somehow unremarkable, with no detours Weil is possible only. It goes so gradually over of a camera that would be synonymous to a different feasible, when the man would suddenly ask: how does it work? (If you do not already know it) \u003cbr /\u003e I could not care less synonymous with what turn the cam. But if you have a Red Hat at hand, why should not she take? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Zacharias
Antwort von jwd96:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Red EPIC \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - RAW \u003cbr /\u003e - More frames per second \u003cbr /\u003e - Higher resolution \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e That would be the only points that I would now think of why you want to use an EPIC. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now might be superior to whether the guys here in this film may have more fps with twisted in order to better stabilize certain passages. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e But the grading (the RAW material offers the possibilities), or high resolution is not there at all. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So I wonder why you had a Red Cam for use shown here and if it is not just "cool" to say "We have a movie with NER and NEM Octocopter RED twisted .... the story is not so but dolle after all, ne RED and NEN Copter " \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Well understandable what I
Antwort von rakzak:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von mannamanna:
Embarrassing, have a look at the third time realized that the same is not always the Ninja, the more is to come - and the ending is not happy, at least for the Nija ;-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e manna
Antwort von jwd96:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von DiMaDo:
Disadvantage in my eyes is synonymous to the copter abundant dust to rise, especially clearly seen in the opening scenes ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Is just inherently no different. Would also recognize you at a low altitude air movement in the grass or plants.
Antwort von FabeX:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Frank B.:
Arguments speaking for the use of the RED? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e You want to apply for and get the Octocopter synonymous in the professional market / application. \u003cbr /\u003e The use of the expensive camera is a message a.potentielle Customer: Look, we rely on our device such an expensive camera. The Octocopter can wear it with him it is safe. \u003cbr /\u003e With the image is determined to do much.
Antwort von pilskopf:
So I do not know. I enjoy the Chopter very good but the grading and the cut is bad imo, so I can understand not here, but you must see at once that the section does not fit at all. What is actually the exact grading now, I see only a part of the image is completely black and darkened to the work atmosphere? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Where the terrain is exactly what this means? Ausgelutscht apparently so I've never seen that before somewhere.
Antwort von rush:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von handiro:
because hamwers again: best & most expensive technology, huge effort and zero content ....
Antwort von reikel:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von unodostres:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Sinus:
I was up last fall for a synonymous OktoKopter aerial photographs. For about 13 years I am in modeling the way. The reason that I have put the issue back at the moment is simply that it is still too much about model \u003cspan style=\
Antwort von reikel:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Crookie:
Just great shots. \u003cbr /\u003e Thus synonymous shit what dranhaengt a.dem Copter. \u003cbr /\u003e Contents boring or unrealistic? It does not matter anyway super shots. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Otherwise there are all considered more likely to Optics, rather than on content. Then why not synonymous here, where it really matters only to the optics?
