Frage von sennox:
Question 1: \u003cbr /\u003e Since I got the camera bloederweise only a day before an important turning and the whole time I thought would work with 25p, I have a problem now because I've actually worked with 50i. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now there before me two days to shoot. Now I wonder should I continue to keep working so everything is the same with 50i or can I switch to 25p quiet conscience ... and later with 50i 25p mix? I mean the pure understanding, I can indeed only deinterlace the entire Project at the issue ... and if I deinterlace progressive material is interlaced so is not it? ... So my understanding I would say that now that the material is interlaced and progresive is later reversed ... which would lead me to all the deinterlace interlaced material to individuallyand then only with the progressive material to mix .... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So my theory ... Do I have a flaw? Does it work this way? Or can I mix bedenklos? (I use Adobe Premiere Pro) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Question 2: \u003cbr /\u003e I am most locations documentaries for the Web. Would it use to be here in future probably more useful 24fps instead of 25 right? I read the many monitors dafrstellen 25 is not as good as 24p due to 60Hz ... Now my Question has, 24fps not very "sluggish film" documentaries run so I think something more "liquid" \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Question 3: \u003cbr /\u003e Before that I used a VG10 which SonyNEX yes synonymous AVCHD has recorded 1080 50i. I would have to actually my first recording in 1080i mode in exactly the same format as before with the Sonynexvg10 have recorded ..
 |
Antwort von pilskopf:
To 1: Try some of what happens when you mix in your NLE both formats. In my opinion, the mix should go, but I want to say anything wrong. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e to 2: a matter of taste but I can not see any difference between the two frame numbers - I like 24p \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e to3: No idea where the problem is or was. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So I can not really help, sorry
Antwort von WoWu:
To 1) \u003cbr /\u003e Never change during the production of an image formats! \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e To 2) For the Web to meet the same criteria as for any publication, if you not only postage big show in 12 frames presented content Do. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e To 3) \u003cbr /\u003e Image quality is not dependent primarily on the codec or the Fildformat. \u003cbr /\u003e The Opposite position in the image quality you have to clarify a.Beispiel. for there is no "blanket" citation said.
Antwort von dienstag_01:
Regarding 2) I think I explicitly say that I certainly do not know, I'm interested but would certainty, the frame rate of 24p is synonymous not a better way than 25p for Web (computer monitors). In the interlaced field but this is different (24p - 60i).
