Frage von ThomasM:
I am currently in search of a microphone and 2 models have been synonymous in the further choice:
AKG C1000S and Rode M3 Stands in a review:
The sensitivity of both microphones - a tribute s.The design - relatively small. When AKG there are on average about seven mV / PA, where it really matters, is set up which of the two adapters. When Røde there are 7.2 mV / PA. Thus, both demand a high performance microphone preamplifier, which should in turn an input sensitivity of at least-have a 60 dBu Signal to noise ratio of at least -70 dB to avoid disturbing noise on the recording.
(; Source: Professional audio magazines 12/2007)
There is any significance for the use s.der HV30? Know me with these things / values not look so ...
I am of course open to synonymous oriented model for other proposals which s.meinen requirements: Allround Micro, XLR with battery; robust for interviews;
Antwort von hofnarr:
the akg c1000 is widespread among radio people, and versatile. synonymous, it is good to use as a reporter in the video micro-range, if you do not mind the housing color (and the first series c1000 was still black) ...
I had hitherto rode the paw not in the ...
With approximately 7mV/Pa both are about equally loud. the preamp to the hv30 I do not know, s.einer xm2 or Sony VX2100 but it works pretty well ... c1000
Antwort von ThomasM:
From the color produced, I would rather tend to Rode;) For this you can turn the switch of AKG Cardioid Hypercardioid on. The Rode had a switchable attenuator synonymous - but that may not have the HV30 (again, via the menu)?
Incidentally, the Rode & AKG can be found at Thomann Test Reports:
http://www.thomann.de/at/rode_m3.htm
Antwort von hofnarr:
The 142dB max. noise level, which will cope with the rode as per data sheet to reach you roar up to the interview with a maximum. since passed but before the trommelfell ;-)
http://www.rodemic.com/downloads/m3/m3_datasheet.pdf
interesting is that even the switchable highpass filter that defused Ideally, low-frequency rumble. The c1000 has not. no idea whether the hv30 has a switchable low cut or pad. at a price below 100 euros, the rode is certainly much cheaper than the akg. If I could not have been eternally two c1000, would I rode alone out of curiosity one m3 order ;-)
Antwort von ThomasM:
What do you think is (in an interview situation, indoor / outdoor) more important, the switchable filter / damping or exchange bureau kidney / hypercardioid?
Is there really an adapter, with which I can put 2 XLR mono mics each on the left and right stereo track of the HV30?
@ jester: if I buy the M3, I will be happy times you can borrow for free for one weeks - if you're from Vienna + Area ... :)
Antwort von ruessel:
Is there really an adapter, with which I can put 2 XLR mono mics each on the left and right stereo track of the HV30? Have you ever thought that the Rode M3 is around 1 / 3 longer than the HV30, and even harder with this bracket? What gives?
Antwort von ThomasM:
@ ruessel: yes, of course - I've said before Nirg that I s.Zubehörschuh the mic, or want to be installed;) I deliberately want a hand mike.
Antwort von ruessel:
I will deliberately a handheld microphone. Then watch out for a good mechanical "hand" decoupling, or are s.lautesten finger noise. Cardioid microphones are very sensitive because ....
Antwort von hofnarr:
What do you think is (in an interview situation, indoor / outdoor) more important, the switchable filter / damping or exchange bureau kidney / hypercardioid? damping you need is rare, often low cut, because the wind is synonymous with noises, among other things helpful. kidney / kidney is hyper (; especially indoors), and sometimes synonymous depending on the situation a "matter of faith." classic reportage micros are often printed receiver = kugel. Some people use hand-held as synonymous placing tubes reportage micros and sometimes it works synonymous ;-)
Is there really an adapter, with which I can put 2 XLR mono mics each on the left and right stereo track of the HV30? Of 3.5 mm stereo jack adapter twice xlr there, but you can synonymous normal cable stereo jack to 2 x cinch divert the cut cinch plugs and 2 couplings xlr solder. in such solutions, the signal adapter implementation is always asymmetrical, you should be the cable lengths to keep micros rather short ...
elegant solutions, there are the adapters of beachtek or studio1, very cheap, they are unfortunately not:
http://www.beachtek.com/
http://www.studio1productions.com/index.htm
Antwort von msteini3:
@ ThomasM: I have a BEYERDYNAMIC MCE 86 S II CAM:
http://www.thomann.de/de/beyerdynamic_mce86sii_cam_richtrohrmikrofon.htm
http://www.beyerdynamic.de/broadcast-studio-video-production/produkte/mikrofone/mikrofone-fuer-video-film.html?tx_sbproductdatabase_pi1% 5BshowUid% 5BshowUid% 5D% 5D = 395 & tx_sbproductdatabase_pi1% 5BshowUid% 5D% 5BbackPID% 5D = 88 & = cHash 88a17c2b24
It is operated s.einer SonyHC1. I must, however, Austen manual, because the automatic transmission too far rears and then creates a noise in quiet passages.
Since I live in synonymous WU, you may like to drop by for testing.
Markus
Antwort von ThomasM:
I have another question that has arisen for me:
Suppose I use the HV30 with
two mono mics
1) the above Rode or AKG with XLR + jack adapter on
2) For example, a Rode VideoMic
Adapter for it would be no problem. But my question is, have the following: If I have two
different mono mic input s.Stereo the HV30, I can separate the two channels levels (, presumably because the two microphones have different susceptibility) or go to the HV30 not?
And if not, it would work with one Beachtek adapter?
Would it really such a small mixer:
http://www.thomann.de/de/rolls_mx_34.htm Information from the hv20.com Forum: Does seem, however, has meant that no part of MIC output, but LINE, as far as I know what the signal is stronger. Can damage the camera? Or is it an advantage, because the HV30 does not have to even step up?
Thanks for your help in any case:) Have learned a lot here!
Antwort von hofnarr:
the two levels can be separated känäle the hv30 apparently not, at least not what the instructions:
http://files.canon-europe.com/files/soft31926/manual/HV30_CUG_DEU.pdf
perhaps but a hv30 owner knows more about it here ...
beachtek a passive adapter should work, eg you can order the "fair" level of the microphone s.den Customize "quieter" microphone, but does not enhance signal low.
the small mixer would be (; like almost every active small microphone mixer with at least 2 channels) is a possibility, with the microphone level at which you need to raise synonymous can. but again you need a cable adapter of the 3.5 mm jack to the Rode VideoMic xlr input of rolls ...
Another pseudo-field mixer priced out of the corner would zb here:
http://www.behringer.com/EN/Products/1002B.aspx
an adaptation of on-line when needed can miclevel with (realizing a damping member easily and conveniently, are just a few resistors) ...
