Frage von doki:
Hallo erstmal, I'm new here in this forum
I have your forum for a long time and has thus synonymous've learned quite a bit, but I am still a novice.
So now to my questions:
I would like AVCHD movie files (*. mts) with Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 cut. Since I am only a dual core processor and 2 GB of Ram and have it bothers me not that I am not with CS3 natively cut, because eh would not go well.
That is why I have the Grass Valley ProCoder 3 purchased to view the files into an intermediate format.
1) In what format should I convert now? Here in the forum is because you are not quite synonymous agree, it seems to me: MPEG2 HQ has led to large blocks and a transformation coding is clearly visible. But another alternative is for me synonymous not yet herrauskristalisiert.
So what settings do I need in ProCoder to make not too much to get lost?
Or someone knows a better workflow with other Transcoder (Xilisoft Video Converter?).
2) Which codec should you use? When using the Canopus HQ codec is used, the output files so illegible when you uninstalled or ProCoder?
I have already used the search function and I have long adopted the theme, but still no dezitierte solution, so please do not refer to the search.
And I am a Beginner, clearly, but I hope it can still accept someone of my question, because surely several people interested.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
There are but a plug-in for the AVCHD Nativschnitt:
Antwort von doki:
thanks for the quick reply!
Among the plug-in: Is the problem then if I later want to change PPro CS4?
I think I should be recalled that some forum users are not completely satisfied with it were, but it can be synonymous, since that I mistaken.
In AviSynth frightens me a little of the complexity that I had your contribution on your homepage even read (which, incidentally, is very informative).
Had to go through ProCoder 3 less to recommend? And can I use the Adobe Encoder?
What exactly is the difference between MPEG2 and HQ to Canopus HQ AVI Intra-Frame Intermediate? Are there advantages bezgl. space and computing power?
In addition to PPro CS3: there is actually no project templates for 1920x1080 interlaced. I think, because I must prepare myself what. What are the correct settings?
I have a Canon HF100.
I hope I do not slay you with my flood s.Fragen.
Thanks again for your professional answer!
Edit: Again the MainConcept plugin: the plugin is to go through intermediates or allow a Nativschnitt the AVCHD files?
Since my PC is not exactly the ideal cut is Pc, makes a difference for me (Intel C2D e6550, 2gb ram, radeon 2600xt, windows xp 32bit)
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Among the plug-in: Is the problem then if I later want to change PPro CS4? I do not know, but I would possibly change in CS5.
Had to go through ProCoder 3 less to recommend? It's expensive!
And can I use the Adobe Encoder? I do not know!
What exactly is the difference between MPEG2 and HQ to Canopus HQ AVI Intra-Frame Intermediate? - MPEG2 GOP is based
- HQ AVI is intra-frame based
Are there advantages bezgl. space and computing power? HQ AVI requires significantly more space, but it is from the PC easier to deal with many tracks you need, perhaps 0-RAID disk group.
In addition to PPro CS3: there is actually no project templates for 1920x1080 interlaced. I think, because I must prepare myself what. Put you a free designable visible Desktop Project (see Manual).
What are the correct settings?
I have a Canon HF100. For the Nativmaterial you can not create AVCHD because CS3 can not accept. With the above plug-in you get but synonymous appropriate project templates.
Edit: Again the MainConcept plugin: the plugin is to go through intermediates or allow a Nativschnitt the AVCHD files? Nativschnitt, see above.
Since my PC is not exactly the ideal cut is Pc, makes a difference for me (Intel C2D e6550, 2gb ram, radeon 2600xt, windows xp 32bit) Need to stop trying as it s.besten when you run, if necessary upgrade.
The need so many users of this comic Media Card Vido make.
