Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Adobe Apps (still) too slow on Intel Macs Of rob - April 3, 2006 06:44:00 As can be read at Barefeats colleague, have the professional tools of Adobe, such as After Effects, Illustrator and Co. nor proper performance problems on Intel Macs. This is mainly s.der PPC emulation environment called Rosetta, which is necessary to run PPC code on Intel-based Mac OS X. The full processor performance is likely to be only with a port to Universal Binary available. So who is dependent on performance in high-performance Intel-based Macs, either still or wait can Barefeats call s.Adobe connect to port as quickly as possible.
Antwort von LoKs:
It is perfectly clear and quite unnecessary to test it yet and wonder why that does not run as fast as under a Quad G5 ...
A typical filler or Zeittodschläger wenns no news there ...
UniversalBin studio is out of ... they should because the final test synonymous iMovie6 ned the real hit is on the dual iMacs
Antwort von Renee:
So I close myself in the call to port as quickly as possible univeral binaries of After Effects, because I get on my new Mac Book Pro must be running.
Renee
Antwort von Nico:
Hello,
I can connect my speakers just wants me to buy a new Powerbook, and have to rely mainly on Photoshop. In grottig performance under Rosetta I'm still waiting - for me not quite unimportant news ;-)
Nico
Antwort von smart:
Faster .. port to port hopp Adobe.
All other habens synonymous already done so ... Even Cinema 4d - and det is not exactly soo verbereitet like Adobe Photoshop and the whole kram.
But after a competition has indeed purchased the adobe in terms of graphics software habens the halt no longer need to respond quickly to ...
Sometime gibts eh only Adobe ... yawn
Antwort von CHS:
Cinema4D has been ported as soon as Maxon programmed for a long time, almost platform independent. Since it is only a stone's throw to port the software.
Antwort von Kira:
Hi,
I do not know because it - what it is platform-independent programming? which must still synonymous optimize for different operating systems. you could clarify something - that interests me.
to adobe:
if they are not moved swiftly enough apple is determined to develop its own solutions. motion is then more aftereffects can be extended aperture to photoshop etc.. adobe cuts as only into his own flesh if they do not chase up fast program code. the sooner the better because rosetta sucks.
k.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Somehow, Kira is right.
Personally, I would need only synonymous drigend Photoshop. Good, perhaps synonymous Xpress and Freehand. Final Cut Pro, DVD Studio, Motion and iWork, Logic and all system programs give me absolutely. All of Apple. Fast, well made and easy. And available to all as synonymous UB.
