Frage von Paul Kirschke:
Hello User,
I have an Athlon 3000 XP System and ask myself zuzulegen the above software. Somewhere I read that the prog is running only with the Athlon64. Is that true? Must also be installed Win XP with the SP2?
Antwort von mcconner:
Hello,
yes, Adobe Premiere Elements 2.0 requires the SSE2 instruction set, and the can not the Athlon XP.
Other processor means here, unfortunately, synonymous different motherboard and possibly other stores.
Or you rack up another program.
Regards
McConn
Antwort von hannes:
> Or you'll catch another program.
which is certainly the most sensible is (;-))
particularly important functions in this "light version" is not available. It will obviously only make you hungry for Appro
Antwort von Chris2:
> Or you'll catch another program. similar price-and quality class: The light version of Sony Vegas:
http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/products/showproduct.asp?PID=977
particularly important functions in this "light version" is not available. It will obviously only make you hungry for Appro I think this is a rumor. Premiere Elements is designed as a full product for the target group "Home users and contains restrictions (must be synonymous ... it costs only one seventh of the price of Prempro) but synonymous features that make it into the Pro version so there is not at all ( DVD menus, Batch Wizard Stillimage-stuff, ...). Other target precisely.
Antwort von hannes:
The 'I consider it a rumor.
Yes?
Then work with it once, then you'll see.
I threw it certainly go back down.
Price of manufactures, there is no reason for this synonymous crippled version.
For 50 ¬ you can get today already MediaStudioPro7.
Since you have a full program without any restrictions.
Antwort von Chris2:
> Then, once work with it, then you'll see. Do I synonymous - at home (and work on work uswith Video Collection Pro). There is really only four things that I find something annoying:
1st) it is not a second PC monitor support (the program window can not be greater than drag)
2nd one) timelines can not (by "eye" icon to make invisible but was most improved in version 2.0)
3.) ripple-delete is enabled by default (can be), but bypass via shortcut.
Are 4.) No file-sharing with After Effects (possible because the project files, but XML-based, but can perhaps somehow synonymous with a fixed one simple scripted Converter ... I need time to look yet).
Everything else is totally for me to clean cutting short of things in order.
I threw it certainly go back down. Tastes and requirements are different ...
For 50 ¬ you can get today already MediaStudioPro7. ... I, in spite of the low price, consider it little more than a completely overburdened consumer program. This software tries obsessively an "egg Wollmilchsau to be", but IMHO clear concept synonymous few weaknesses and bugs.
Better a complete, well-programmed and optimized engine, features, and filter as an unqualified mess.
Antwort von Paul Kirschke:
Hello,
between Vegas was mentioned, there is this prog in German or a German workshop manual or equivalent? I want to cut my eigenlich twisted movies, accompanied with 'normal' transitions, music and failed to ban it several of these films on DVD. As I previously wg in various forums regarding encoder very different opinions. Quality and speed of reading, here is a new attempt, my work s.den AVI files to optimize.
Antwort von Chris2:
I'm not sure, but I think Vegas, there's only in English.
German's tutorial here:
http://www.vegasvideo.de
A German distributor (no product placement but the only one I know) would be the example here:
http://www.soundservice.de/ (see "Sony Media Software")
Antwort von Helmi2:
> Especially important functions in this "light version" is not available. That would be there.
1st ..
2nd ..
3rd ..
Antwort von MiXMaster:
what do you mean?
Antwort von Helmi2:
what do you mean? Has done himself.
There are a number of other post dealing with the issue.
Antwort von Mr Jo:
As I previously wg in various forums regarding encoder very different opinions. Quality and speed of reading, here is a new attempt, my work s.den AVI files to optimize Hi Paul,
I use the last few days the Canopus Procoder Express. The program will cost about 60 eur, and I must say that each one of these Euros well spent. The quality of the encoded files (*. mpg-especially at my files for DVD creation) is so good that I'm in the process, all of my recent DVD Make it new (the original-Avi-Files, I'm still so in most cases). The result is simply unconvincing.
Greeting Mr Jo
Antwort von Helmi2:
I use the last few days the Canopus Procoder Express. The program will cost about 60 eur, and I must say that each one of these Euros well spent. The quality of the encoded files (*. mpg-especially at my files for DVD creation) is so good that I'm in the process, all of my recent DVD Make it new (the original-Avi-Files, I'm still so in most cases). The result is simply unconvincing.
That sounds good. What software did you use before?
Antwort von Mr Jo:
What software did you use before? Hi Helmi2,
after various experiments with the built-in MPEG encoders of various editing programs (Premiere Elements, Premiere Pro, and Ulead VideoStudio9 Pinnacle Studio9plus) I ended up in Nero .. With Vision Express Avi files then can be exported to *. mpeg format ". The encoder can be a configuration of the bit rate and VBR 2Pass too .. so I was (almost) happy ..
With Procoder Express, but the tide has clearly turned again .. the differences of that encoder to date, not so "dramatic" and mainly by the choice of VBR and determines the bit rate, so Procoder can expand significantly over a wide area .. analogy, even in ancient times, shooting out Video8 is a clear pros s.weniger pixels and steadiness noted. The effect keeps s.Television is limited, but the mpg file s.PC monitor with such a Resolutionvon viewed 1280 x 1024, is the difference immediately. For DV footage, the fine detail such as grasses swaying in the wind wins again so clearly that determine the difference in synonymous s.TV Comparison is.
DVD's I create remains with Vision Express, then I choose "SmartEncoding" in the default options, thereby creating the DVD is the only menu generated a renewed encoding of the films does not occur. The quality is so .. Procoder on the DVD of course, is elected at the Procoder "Highest Quality" and "2Pass VBR" in the settings.
Greeting Mr Jo
Antwort von Helmi2:
Your description is forcing me formally next week, not just a new analog-DV converter but still synonymous Procoder Express to buy.
That is changing a lot of money because the software only eigenlich AVI to MPEG. Quasi a video Zipper. ;-)
http://www.digitalschnitt.de/produkte/zubehoer/
Sigh. I hope the differences are so great that it pays off.
New workflow.
1. Reading with Canopus ADV-55
2. Cut with Premiere Elements 2.0
3. Delinterlace VirtualDub
4. Converting with Procoder Express 2.0 Canopus
5. Burn to DVD with Nero 7.0
If I could do better?
Greetings
Helmut
Antwort von Mr Jo:
If I could do better? No, but different ;-)
Item 3 Delinterlace VirtualDub can miss you, does it all the Procoder (see settings in the Picture)
Greeting Mr Jo
Appendix: DVD settings for Procoder, VBR 2 pass, average bitrate 5072 (equivalent to approximately 2 hours movie on DVD)
zum Bild
Antwort von Helmi2:
New workflow.
1. Reading with Canopus ADV-55
2. Cut and convert with EDIUS Pro 3
5. Burn to DVD with Nero 7.0
A full version of Edius, there are currently at a Crossupgrade by 199 Euros. Check whether or not I change of Adobe Premiere Elements 2.0 for EDIUS PRO 3.5 will. Unfortunately, the offer only runs until 31.12.2005
The package of Proder Express is already included.
Antwort von Markus:
New workflow.
1. Reading with Canopus ADV-55
2. Cut with Premiere Elements 2.0
3. Delinterlace VirtualDub
4. Converting with Procoder Express 2.0 Canopus
5. Burn to DVD with Nero 7.0
If I could do better? Yes, you could save you the deinterlacing. Each PAL device can deal with interlaced video, as this is defined in the specification so. ;-)
Learn More:
Deinterlacing - or not?
