Frage von MiXMaster:
Yes, I know if this post reads überschrift, thinks to oneself: Oh God, schonwieder such an idiot, not the fading hinkriegt.
This is true, but well, it's not the 1st Crossfade, which I created and still I'm s.verzweifeln.
So I have two scenes that are to be faded. So I add as the "soft Aperture a". When I look at the whole, the Aperture works in principle synonymous - but you can see during the Aperture short, a picture of a completely different scene! How did they respond to that?
I have read something like this, that such effects can occur if one has several scenes with the same timecode. But I'm pretty sure that the two scenes of a coming and the same tape!
Thank you schonmal ...
Antwort von steve:
Already done ... bye
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Hi,
erstmal thank you for your reply.
So the fact is, I have a little over 2 seconds and 12 seconds car bike.
It is now even less than in your example, but I do not understand the principle.
If I use a aperture, which is exactly 2 seconds long, then I need 2 seconds out of the car scene, and 2 seconds from the bike scene (when Aperture is 2 seconds). That would indeed mean that my car starts scene after 200 milliseconds crossfade, but even erstmal plays no role.
Even if I have the transition terminates in a length of 20 frames, I see the "wrong" picture during the transition. The figure it out, I absolutely do not ...
Would be nice if you tell me that again could explain.
Antwort von rush:
So ..
'ne blende consumption as you know, "feed" ...
CLIP A - 2 seconds
CLIP B - 12 seconds
blende time - 2 seconds?
So now you want a 2 seconds to dazzle of A-> B, then you will can not succeed, because seconds after the 2 simply nothing there is a clip of which you can hide ... is hot, you could shorten the clip to about 1 second in the timeline and then again 25 frames Had overhang could be used to hide the ...
comes out then? I think so;) it is late ... hehe
Antwort von MiXMaster:
So if I dazzle of A-> B wants, why should the 2 seconds which still be there? If the fading is only 2 seconds, then disappears after 2 seconds nurnoch CLIP CLIP A and B visible. Why then even more material from A CLIP?
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Hi,
So now I'm still a little bit rumprobiert and found that Aperture will work if I CLIP B to another video track lay and let the two overlap.
The question now is: Why do you have to do it and sometimes themselves) sometimes not (overlap? The other panels in the Project that is all I have left on the same video track, although they work wonderfully!
Antwort von Hanzl:
So, in the premiere of my knowledge, two types of transition are possible:
1) The two clips are then needed, it must "flesh" be present (the original scene to be longer than that) in the timeline. When meat is missing Premiere can add still images, but this only works if the ident Überblendstelle synonymous with the end or is Originalclipanfang . Is Orignialclip before or after the Überblendstelle another scene that does not recognize the premiere and believes there is enough meat there. False images purely slipping. That happened synonymous with "cut" scenes, as s.das premiere of original material and holds a scene change is not detected. Fairly offense, if you like me as much as possible and make sense captured in one piece. Reinrutschen The Images Of scheibar completely "foreign" (ie non-contiguous) scenes could happen by cutting labor, synonymous with "Stills" I've seen mistakes.
2) overlap in the same track and fade over the length of the overlap. My preferred method is sensitive only when handlungswichtige scenes fall into the overlap. Against too short or missing material is hardly a halt grown herb. Attaching of still images would sometimes be the lesser evil, but this works (see above), unfortunately, only if the original clip ends or begins. Here would be for the other case, a manual option s.einer interface very useful. Even still images to create works for me only occasionally, because Premiere seems like interfaces within the overlap and not to export and re-import is not synonymous very elegant.
Good luck wishes Louis.
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Thank you very much! You brought a lot of light into the dark:)
So Will now prefers to always leave the blinds "manual" overlap.
