Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Advisor: Advisor: camcorder of the year 2008 of rudi - 12 Dec 2008 11:14:00 > SELECTION Every year we in the Christmas in our opinion, the best camcorder models in various price ranges. Kept short and certainly not uncontroversial, we present you our favorites now the 2008th Curtain up ...
Antwort von motiongroup:
Attention is all because some users of A **** bleed .. particularly in the scoring until 1000Euros ..
Antwort von ruessel:
Why not the Nikon D90 s.erster place up to 1000 euro? Has everything you want to have .... LowLight super-sized hot viewfinders, ideal manual focus control, an interchangeable lens = geiler Wide Anglebis frog eye possible, etc. For me the milestone in 2008 with new technology. Who wants you to an even 1 / 3 inch chip or even smaller in the camera have?
;-)
Antwort von groover:
The downside of the Nikon D90 is unfortunately missing the microphone input.
Otherwise, this device would be really very interesting.
LG
GROOVE
Antwort von ruessel:
The downside of the Nikon D90 is the lack of microphone input. Then try the 'Camcorder of the Year "to clean the sound levels. I have in the database Slashcam found nothing about this ....
Antwort von groover:
The camcorder of the year for me is absolutely not an issue ........
Good sound, however, already.
And this feature of the D90 easy "nor" no.
If the next development in the direction of Still Image Camera goes, I would just right.
LG
GROOVE
Antwort von hock jürgen:
Actually, a great pity this is not the Canon HF 100 wins even though they are in the test of the Panasonic in picture quality far superior. (Under Test) and synonymous in my own comparison. Is this perhaps s.der right of Page Slashcam Page where even weeks advertising of Panasonic runs.
It seems to me it is synonymous here with everything from magazines to the test.
Best Regards
Jürgen Hock
Antwort von Zizi:
Yes .. The SD100 is completely for ass!
Handling is synonymous not everything .. which utilizes 1080 HD it may stand for me is a mystery! more ultra-sharp 16:9!
So I was not even a week before landing back on the Ebay! The HF100 is clearly preferable because they are not synonymous when an all-rounder is!
Antwort von Meggs:
3 x Sony, 1 x Panasonic, you're in the clinch with Canon?
What I do not understand:
In your database has the Canon HV30 for a better assessment than the Panasonic SD100, the Canon XH A1 has a better rating than the SonyFX 1000th The camcorder of the year, with the lower valuation. Why?
Antwort von domain:
Simply because in this election, times the reason has triumphed and the quality of the tool and not s.sich any laboratory values included (which, incidentally synonymous times in the text above).
Sharpness fanatics should see very much (especially all the other Picture parameter) and are therefore extremely gracious in dealing with each other from their point of view insignificant features of camcorders.
Antwort von Zizi:
Simply because in this election, times the reason has triumphed and the quality of the tool and not s.sich any laboratory values included (which, incidentally synonymous times in the text above).
Sharpness fanatics should see very much (especially all the other Picture parameter) and are therefore extremely gracious in dealing with each other from their point of view insignificant features of camcorders. Yes da geb ich dir recht!
But a top SD100 s.der understand I did not!
This camera was for me the biggest flop 08!
Especially because the expectations were very high, loud and Lowlight predecessor GS500 etc.!
Just because a pseudo-ring and viewfinder anyway None has the right to use is still far from being a empgehlenswerte Camera!
The HF100 is 100x recommended synonymous if the lot is not synonymous passt!
The FX1000 and the rest is fine!
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) The FX1000 and the rest is fine! Well, if SAE student Daniel Zanetti says, it must be so!
Only he can judge what is okay.
Antwort von Zizi:
Well, if SAE student Daniel Zanetti says, it must be so!
Only he can judge what is okay. What is going on with you, have an open ass?
If what you want to get rid of personal mach where the different!
and please you in the future, saving your hypocrisy!
That the FX1000 is a good camera, may I still say ..
It is my opinion anyway!
or Apple is now synonymous cameras so that you only Apple Cams as well may mean? Apple Troll du ..
Antwort von DWUA:
You open your mouth.
Much worse!
Antwort von hock jürgen:
Hello, to think again!
Panasonic 336 points from Slashcam
Canon HF 100 366 points from Slashcam
Best Regards
Jürgen
Antwort von Meggs:
Simply because in this election, times the reason has triumphed and the quality of the tool and not s.sich any laboratory values included (which, incidentally synonymous times in the text above).
As far as I understand the Slashcam tests, the scores considered synonymous not only the laboratory values, but is a total rating on the camcorder overall.
Antwort von domain:
In this election, there seems in retrospect to be somewhat different weightings:
"The handling is very much behind Canon's competitors, which the SD100 Panasonic with the new (old) trend towards more service opportunities continues. Hopefully, a good incentive for the Canon here abzuschauen something in the future." Furthermore, even the general statement that it would be highly s.der time, is synonymous in the consumer area times the wide range vorzuknöpfen.
I would like the Pana for the mini-sensors is not synonymous growth but we already recognize and that I welcome very much that this time more innovative features and trends in the foreground were not pure and Pixeltüftlerei.
Antwort von gunman:
Well, if SAE student Daniel Zanetti says, it must be so!
Only he can judge what is okay.
What is going on with you, have an open ass?
If what you want to get rid of personal mach where the different!
and please you in the future, saving your hypocrisy!
That the FX1000 is a good camera, may I still say ..
It is my opinion anyway!
or Apple is now synonymous cameras so that you only Apple Cams as well may mean? Apple Troll du .. Hi,
So please! I'm not necessarily a friend of PowerMacs Auesserungen in this forum. But there is a big difference between his harsh criticism, which may sometimes synonymous slightly below the Gürtellienie lies, and your letter manière loose.
Gunman
Antwort von Meggs:
In this election, there seems in retrospect to be somewhat different weightings:
That is not it, on the contrary, such as quasi-document links are in it to the respective tests. In any event, I understand this.
Antwort von domain:
Original Adenauer: "What will my stupid chatter of yesterday."
Moreover, where is the problem? Have you ev a HF 100?
Regardless of any evaluation, it is important that you do with your tool're happy.
Antwort von Meggs:
Moreover, where is the problem? Have you ev a HF 100?
Regardless of any evaluation, it is important that you do with your tool're happy. Nope I have of the not rated camcorders. In the foreseeable future, I would like NEN HD camcorder growth. That is why I am following tests and evaluations. I am for me come to the conclusion that in the 3000 ¬ Class A1 (now s) is the favorite. It covers, among other things synonymous with the Slashcam test. I had actually hoped that somebody of Slashcam to comment why they are now using your camcorder as assessed differently in the respective tests.
Antwort von domain:
Slashcam quote: "... kept short and certainly not
uncontroversial, we present ..."
They have deliberately false Camera on the podium lifted so that the discussion in the sour cucumber time something is revived :-))
Antwort von Jan:
I think I would have decided similarly, except in the class under 1000 ¬.
synonymous if the Camera Viewfinder has not - it would be for me the new Canon HG 20 has become - probably synonymous to SonySR 11, JVC HD 30 & 40 (simply because this company for me with the biggest leap forward has made the company interested in or for the editors and provides two HD recording formats?) or Canon HF 100 (price / performance).
FX 7 (up to 2000 ¬ gibts eh not much), FX 1000 and EX 1, one can indeed understand.
VG
Jan
Antwort von domain:
But once again proves that it is in the ¬ 1000, - the power class as closely involve other is that you no longer can give advice or should be, because each of the mentioned models can be happy.
The various discussions in this segment, remind me s.alte Photo Club times.
So, now the subject with a 17-Din Film and same with the 21-Din same film company. What we see? During the 17-Din film can fence slats in 200m distance still clearly distinguishable, which is at 21 Din no longer.
Sometimes I thought that the presenters themselves in a couple of fence slats were missing ;-)
Antwort von tillbaer:
@ domain :-)))
Quite your opinion! I have three HV30 and found the quality great. Nevertheless captivate me repeatedly Vimeo videos, for example with SD5/SD9 which were made, or with the HC1. All Cameras, schärfemäßig which lie beneath my HV30. I consider just moving to AVCHD and the SD100 is one of the HF100 and the HF11 to my favorites.
For me it is still s.wichtigsten WHAT I film, and not whether or not with 15% more or less sharpness. A few years ago we would have our finger on the sharpness of a SD100 geschleckt. For me this discussion is crying at a high level. But where should something take place if not here?
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The Panasonic HDC-SD100 is has made my test for VAD only a "Satisfactory" to get school grading system, it is a mere fair-weather camera with a Fummel operating concept. The camera lacks the possibility of a personal menu favorites with them. A point-focus is also not. Weak light / Lowlichtaufnahmen are simply unusable, which completely breaks Luminanzauflösung that during bad weather with cloudy sky. Images in 1920x1080 are in store for videos too small, since it practically no more shots can be made.
The LCD monitor deceives a perfect video before, but it is not on the media card to see!
Why this camera in the Camera Slashcam of 2008 has been chosen, probably knows only itself Slashcam Something true because not all the Canon I would - and Sony cameras as well as the JVC cameras far ahead of myself, the Panasonic set tested.
