Frage von shrenk:
Hi folks ..... I sent the following complaint s.Adobe is how it works ... really not. The same is true for synonymous Premiere Pro 2: Hello my lovely program developers ....
.. my friend and I bought our Premiere Elements. When we started the installation was an indication that this was not possible because the SSE2 instruction was not executed. Yes people gehts still good or what else ...? Once we have cleverly made the Internet what the SSE2 in general, we are faced with the question of whether you will lose all ATHLON operators as customers ..... I felt transported back in time as Win95 was still dewy and there for this to s.der agenda was ... but ..... HELLO ... we are in 2006. 40 years ago, some have already managed to shoot people on the moon ... and your day is s.and limited part of your software on a Prozessotypen ....... I really swells the comb. Especially has broken the seal of the packaging, is to say that I can give the software back-longer. Sure, later looked at the packaging it says in the Harwareanforderung in there ..... but to react, I must fetch me here a closer look and actually we had some confidence from the house Adobe. As a premiere, only install on Windows XP, you have indeed been synonymous reisengroß XP written on the package.
Such a system can indeed get over with two still-closed eyes, but I do not buy me now INTEL PC only because the Lord has Adobe somehow get a rappel, and once he said would now be limited to one type of processor. And come to me, please do not s.with "I had it ... are quoted because of the performance and bla bla ..." No, I accept this kind of software do not farm. We as consumers have anyway been punished enough as Banana product users (... now everyone knows all "BARRELS THE CUSTOMER"). Who, or what disabilities commission has said about this mischief actually YES?? No. .... it is therefore an extra buys None INTEL platform. Dear me, I'm looking for a software that is timely and continued on my Athlon running .... unless ANY courageous programmers develop a patch of these SSE2 Mist auschaltet. Good, then again maybe läufts as Premiere Pro 1.5 .... or not. There is then when I take Prempro or Magix 1.5 or Avid Express or something like that. But ok ... what solls. I tell people ATHLON adee as only.
A very disgruntled former Premiere users.
 |
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi,
I can well understand your anger.
When I was myself then excited when I noticed that the beautiful wooden wheels of my coach no longer s.den Ford T fit ....
have long letters written s.Henry Ford, now I regret not being slowly switched back then. Somehow, the others seem to stay more comfortable.
Seriously: What's so problematic? The technology goes next, people want more, faster, next .... Programs to accelerate hardware development, would be where graphics cards or the hardcore gamer?
Play with, or let it be, you are forced to do anything.
Moreover, the new AMDL probably support the SSE 2?
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von Froschkapitän:
Hi folks ..... I sent the following complaint s.Adobe is how it works ... really not. The same is true for synonymous Premiere Pro 2:
... I really swells the comb. I would like to see ...
you'd prefer to buy Edius, the software is better than defitniv premiere for dummies.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
I have both EDIUS Programs and P-Pro ...
Edius is not better, in my experience, Premiere Pro provides at least for my purposes much more ...
Antwort von Ralph:
Seriously: What's so problematic? The technology goes next, people want more, faster, next .... Programs to accelerate hardware development, would be where graphics cards or the hardcore gamer?
Play with, or let it be, you are forced to do anything.
Moreover, the new AMDL probably support the SSE 2?
Gruß Jörg There are still strong doubts as appropriate when Adobe powerful computers such as an Athlon 2800 + erlärt for scrap metal when other programs get cut as much or even more power from the same "old" processor - you should not always so because of obscurantist and Technology - his and herstellergläubig. Why should an editing program only work with the latest processors? But the choice should lie with the user: if my hardware is running a little older, some things stop slowly - and when it is unbearable, and time means money, then I might buy a new calculator. But if I use the * must * be able to start the program at all? It seems to me to be much more likely that there's a deal between Intel and Adobe are officially (to be advised of Adobe only Intel procs) should force the user to upgrade. If I do not edit HDV and Calculator have one that's faster than any other calculator with whom I have worked in the last 5 years of IT, why this should suddenly be too little??
Incidentally, yes Adobe pulls with all 2.0 programs in the system by - SSE2, ie AMD64 or Intel Pentium 4 Processor is Abolut condition - how many times people see the free Adobe who will not upgrade their software for their hardware ...
Ralph
Antwort von Froschkapitän:
Canopus synonymous untersützt only Intel processors.
For good base, there are no good chipsets for AMD CPUs, which touched the s.The quality of intel.
Me synonymous digitalschnitt.de confirmed.
Antwort von shrenk:
Canopus synonymous untersützt only Intel processors.
For good base, there are no good chipsets for AMD CPUs, which touched the s.The quality of intel.
Me synonymous digitalschnitt.de confirmed. Not true ..... we are all our cards (REX RT) with Athlon processors operate. Edius 3.0 synonymous runs fine on it.
Antwort von prem:
Unfortunately, you have me misunderstood.
I did not say that they do not run on the AMD boxes, but that they are not officially supported, although perhaps because the chip sets can be ne AMD cpu vllt better.
Antwort von videosteve:
Hi folks ..... I sent the following complaint s.Adobe is how it works ... really not. The same is true for synonymous Premiere Pro 2:
[b] Hello my lovely program developers ....
.. my friend and I bought our Premiere Elements. When we started the installation was an indication that this was not possible because the SSE2 instruction was not executed. Yes people gehts still good or what else ...? .... I can only agree with your anger, it is an outrage, I have made, unfortunately, the bitter experience with Encore DVD 2.0. (a week ago) I wanted after I had installed on the Intel laptop a try of Encore, install the new version on my office computer, but Adobe says that force me to upgrade to Intel, a boldness of unrivaled. Especially since I have s.Laufen customer projects with 1.5 and do not really have the project file is already open s.Laptop with the 2.0. Now I can finish everything s.Laptop, so those are no longer open 2.0 projects in 1.5 to the new version and I can not install s.Büroarbeitsplatz. Abobe - manager, you are probably your last Windows client now synonymous nor bored? The fruit growers are long dead laughing when Äppler - harvest.
A word to the Ford driver: I want to see your face when your Ford only drives with Formula 1 Super Special Sprit of Shell. Since you will probably get the tears .......
Antwort von Jörg:
Oh Steve,
I do not even bought the Ford, go next coach ....
as already stated, premiere runs fine on an AMD, just something new, he should be.
Greetings from the postman
Antwort von Diego:
Oh Steve,
I do not even bought the Ford, go next coach ....
as already stated, premiere runs fine on an AMD, just something new, he should be.
My Sempron 3300 + is new and still running Premiere 2.0 on it not - my fault? Other editing programs certainly work beautifully with it. So instead of Premiere 1.5 upgrade switch to another program instead of forced hardware upgrade ...
For information: digitalschnitt.de recommends Intel-based systems because of the good combination of Intel processor and Intel motherboard, which is important for the Canopus NLE editing cards, but not because Intel processors are generally better than AMD procs - you simply looks at the benchmarks with different programs of at toms hardware.
Antwort von Jörg:
no, no, your fault. Should have perhaps write: Premiere runs beautifully on an Athlon with the required instruction.
So has nothing to do with Intel or AMD. On an Intel celeron läufts fact not synonymous.
The companies take almost all of Intel as a reference, so what.
The benchmarks of the Athlon is the way editing area in the graphics and not nearly at the same level as in games.
Antwort von prem:
The companies take almost all of Intel as a reference, so what.
The benchmarks of the Athlon is the way editing area in the graphics and not nearly at the same level as in games. to Intel as a reference "that can indeed synonymous s.dem not inconsiderable marketing budget and the" Intel inside "grants are for us and is believed therefore not relevant except user - one that with an Intel Pentium processor, the color (better eye out as so Beautiful in an advertising campaign was called ..)
on the benchmarks in the graphics, or editing area:
The Content Creation Winstone benchmark compares USDI performance of AMD and Intel processors in Premiere, Flash, Photoshop and Wavelab together:
http://www.zdnet.de/enterprise/print_this.htm?pid=39124745-20000002c
There, the AMD beat Intel's CPUs and consume significantly less power still synonymous
http://www.tomshardware.de/cpu/charts/index.html?model1=237&model2=202&chart=63
AMD 3800 X2 vs. Intel D830 (from the comparable price):
DivX Encoding:
5:33 vs. 5:45 s (smaller is better)
3 D Studio Max
1:31 vs. 1:38 s
MainConcept MPEG-2:
2:15 vs. 2:32 s
Pinnacle Studio 9:
1:33 vs. 1:24 s
Xvid Encoding:
4:21 vs. 4:35
Antwort von venzolo:
I did not say that they do not run on the AMD boxes, but that they are not officially supported, just called directly at Canopus and AMD is synonymous officially supported.
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi,
okay, I quote from the same (very old) Test
http://www.zdnet.de/enterprise/client/0,39023248,39124745-15,00.htm
here is the importance of the program option, all cores indicated one per cent, to use. Da gibts then no stopping it. Today's premiere of support and multiprocessor will confirm the result.
Otherwise, to me is totally no preference which CPU each uses to religious wars, I have never been like, and the power consumption, coupled with almost fanless, is certainly an argument for AMD.
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Premiere Pro 2.0 running on my P4-3, 2GHz, 2MB RAM, 128MB-GraKa, S-ATA HDD certainly magnificent. I'm very happy with it!
Antwort von venzolo:
unless you believe that with an Intel Pentium processor, the colors (better eye out as well as in an advertising campaign was called ..) This should relate to the capacity, according to the motto "With Intel CPUs," runs every game synonymous with 32bit color depth liquid (and not switch back to 16bit). Whether this is in reality so was undecided.
hs
