The blog speaks volumes IMO! From a purely market-based perspective while it is clear to understand Apple's decision to phase out products that are not profitable and increasingly new 'life-styles of pushing products ", but professional users, especially in the video section there will soon not much left than to the" hated Change Windows PCs "for!
Antwort von 407621:
After the last!! (Puns, and hopefully not a prophecy) Update to Final Cut Studio 3, it seems to me, unfortunately, synonymous to occur as the blog writer.
BluRay? LiveType? DVD Studio Pro update? Real 3D? 4k video?
Apple is already the main probably only dedicated to the more profitable business can be clearly seen s.den numbers. Too bad! But once Apple Calculator were an integral part of each graph and offices of many film productions.
I'm just waiting out the Adobe Flash dispute escalated, and Adobe released the following software and CS6 only exclusively for the prima running Windows market. Long time is over when it was said that only Macs running reliably. I am angry with myself broken the shortcomings (total battery after 1.5 years, missing key interfaces: eSATA, HDMI ,..., faulty hardware, faulty software, no 8GB Ram in the MacBook Pro early 2008 ,...) my MacBook Pros daily round.
Antwort von makra:
If the Motion team is unable to develop the software was properly next, it would be fitting to an end with terror Herbei lead. I get angry every day on this totally vebuggte piece of software. Beach Balls and crashes after some time a project is more extensive. If they do not, they should let it keep better hinbekommen altogether. There are indeed alternatives: Nuke, After Effect, Blender, ....
I would however wish to live next and Motion will develop into a true 3D compositing tool.
Antwort von Gregott:
I despair slowly synonymous with Apple (I'm so happy s.Anfang, broke my fat 8CORE purchased and what the right time to jump ... 4200 ¬ ... but have always had problems ... can not even FullHD Videos play smoothly ... you can be streamed Youtube videos run with 5 frames ... why? fälschlicherweisse I have been in the store two different graphics cards installed ... after 200 hours, or the vulture knows how much I've rumgeschlagen myself to believe me Of the Apple finally what is wrong with my box .. since my case, when engineering was ... so book now book now they tell me but I can only make one to expand the poor graphics card .... good because, unfortunately, can not twice purely because the MacPro can not supply power ... even the really shit what you think? That I ne as a professional graphics card with 1500 benchmark score using? Kann ja grad mal FullHD of Glump! Looks like ne onboard card. I thought the professionals in the video section in any case, work with it, is now shrinking real benefits immenz ... I think it was then, unfortunately, the last time that I've bought Mac nen. But I wander still so nen small ray of hope which the And which one can integrate both Grakas ... I mean in the video field is always so that you have three monitor ... Two for normal work, and one as reference!
Antwort von joey23:
Mobile devices, that is what we do. (Steve Jobs, January 2010)
It's just a matter of time until all iPhone products for the professional from the Apple product range are komplet wound, and Apple iPod only, and builds iPad. The computer age is slow for Apple. The Sotwarezeitalter it already is. Instead, it is synonymous Usergenerierte software lowest rail s.der can earn vigorously. Is worth more.
Too bad. Now remains only Linux and Windows. Never thought that Apple simply gives up.
Antwort von Alf_300:
As we hear here in the forum so Apple is the smoothest CALCULATOR, Must be because the 40 probably switch to Microsoft, which is constantly Bsustelle. And he looks good, what need of even more.
Antwort von meawk:
Although I'm sorry for the jobs of those guys, but what have since then in terms of AVCHD or MOV h.264 .*- hinbekommen and real-time processing in almost 18 months ago: Unfortunately, not much, I think. So this is again synonymous consistently.
Full concentration on the iPod in terms of Fanboys, Netbook, and so a cheese. And a few more apps are now Maybe come. Wait for the app, which brings about a self-destruction of these parts. . . Regards
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"joey23" wrote:
... Mobile devices, that is what we do ... (Steve Jobs, January 2010) ...
Just because Apple is currently the company is global, with the mobile device has the greatest economic success does not mean giving up other areas. The way mobile devices are synonymous MacBook and MacBook Pro, not just iPod & Co.
"joey23" wrote:
... The computer age is slow for Apple ...
If this were so, it would do this very slowly: In January 2010, the Mac sales were 36% higher than in the previous month, calculated over the first quarter, an increase of at least expect to still about 25%. Apple will hardly be so stupid to retire soon from this booming market.
"joey23" wrote:
... Never thought that Apple simply gives up ...
Apple has fired some employees. This is sad for everyone involved, but conclude from this that the "age of software for Apple had already expired" and that "Apple just give up" is wild speculation. Do you think seriously that in the next year, no Macs, and is no longer FinalCut Pro? Incidentally, Microsoft has released almost exactly a year, almost 1,500 employees and 3,000 more in May 2009 - and Windows continue to exist.
Antwort von Bespi:
Basically, I am delighted with the news. A Buyout Of Final Cuts Adobe would be a dream. The best of Final Cut and Adobe bundled together (Premiere and Final Cut pro so the least likely of the surface not be too hard.) Software and a new all-rounder was born. Adobe probably would be final except in the creative industry, the monopoly (Music).
For News: The killer argument for the Mac, I would not describe motion. It is a very nice program because (yes even synonymous with FCS come along for free), but absolutely irreplaceable. The killer argument would be, if at all, Final Cut Pro itself
Antwort von DWUA:
"Bernd E." wrote:
Incidentally, Microsoft has released almost exactly a year, almost 1,500 employees and 3,000 more in May 2009 - and Windows continue to exist.
So this comparison is still soft. Do you know the synonymous in this regard? http://sites.google.com/site/patrick-kohan/funstuff
> Chain mail against garbage .. mil.
;)))
Antwort von Axel:
"Bespi" wrote:
To be welcomed in principle. Final Cuts a buyout of Adobe would be a dream. The best of Final Cut and Adobe bundled together (Premiere and Final Cut pro so the least likely of the surface not be too hard.) Software and a new all-rounder was born.
For News: The killer argument for the Mac, I would not describe motion. It is a very nice program because (yes even synonymous with FCS come along for free), but absolutely irreplaceable. The killer argument would be, if at all, Final Cut Pro itself
AAE Adobe and Photoshop are to my taste, Premiere and the other stuff, are both needlessly complicated, and the other synonymous with verbugged. Those who do not otherwise know, struggles valiantly to s.and believe that he was working with "pro" because of the former flagships. I test Vegas with a friend, I think that would be more appropriate. That in combination with AAE. What should Adobe be held for them to improve the integration of the Programs, in his suite? Proprietary container for the import of bitchy provide interframe codecs? In addition, a high-quality, very strong real-invent intermediates? No, I think that would be the combination of the Studio Suite with no successful crossing.
I think the question is premature grave. I do not think that Apple's editing software is a deficit, and it will, even if Apple phasing out the pro-rail, a company continue to pick up the concept and, perhaps not with the same staff (we forget that Apple is so good as no software is invented, everything is bought), and of course, synonymous (if not only) for Windows. As for synonymous different when Macs still only send Valentine cards, if they are not already become a substitute for a partner ;-)))
All's Well That Ends Well, Shakespeare is like a piece.
