Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Handling the First Test with HDV CAM Canon XLH1 of rob - 16 Sep 2005 17:19:00 > Clear the slogan calling for the exclusive Canon cameras had exclusive atmosphere-Europe invited the international press to Präsenation of the HDV-capable successor XL2 XL H1 to London. Town of the presentation was "The Hospital" any of the HD production studios send a stone's throw from Covent Garden. The studio was carefully with
elected, could be demonstrated especially the uncompressed SDI output of the HD-CAM under studio conditions in this setting - but the one after ...
full article
Antwort von Dr.Hasenbein:
Hello
a camera so I think just as a hobby filmmakers sometimes technologically interesting (see how at the IAA synonymous times a Ferrari) look at it.
But something relating to pixel shift, when I was 10 years ago I had purchased SonyVX1000 (which still delivers great shots), I asked at the fair a Sony employee, as it looks because the pixel shift with this camera. Even the Hi8 predecessor had sowas ostensibly - read in any video magazine. At that time, Panasonic was much fanfare around the theme, its 3CCD Camera was indeed synonymous with fewer pixels on the chips as Sony.
The response of the Sony-Mann: ANY 3CCD Camera works with this technology, to mention the extra would be as if Mercedes would turn out the new model extra that a wheel is present. I got to this statement has never been a competent opinion of Page. I am interested but once ........
Greeting
Dr.Hasenbein
Antwort von camworks:
"Canon has a number of the H1, therefore, aids donated to lead precisely to the edge. Firstly, there is a button for the so-called peaking at which the edge sharpness is automatically drawn." "peaking" means the kantenaufsteilung only for the viewfinder (with no signal is then recorded!) and to focus is not tools, instruments for the automatic. The steepening in the viewfinder makes it just easier to find the right schärfepunkt (manual) to be found.
certainly it is in professional cameras shoulder so. I would be surprised if Canon realized this would be established with evidence of another function.
Antwort von london rob:
The function of the "peaking" was expressed somewhat misleading - I've now made more clear in the text ...
Antwort von camworks:
So I see no change in the text ... there is still "... edge sharpness is automatically drawn.
Antwort von london rob:
well, there now is that "* * the edge sharpness in the viewfinder is automatically considered" - has now "pulled" by "increasing" replaced, ok?
Antwort von Martin:
So: first a thank s.Slashcam for first info on the Canon. 'm Really looking forward to a comparison test (for Sony and the Panasonic HVX 200 wenns go!:))
PS
Peaking is a resource for focusing. Gesteilt this is the sharpest in the viewfinder. Everything correctly in the text.
Martin S.
Antwort von camworks:
well, there now is that "* * the edge sharpness in the viewfinder is automatically considered" - has now "pulled" by "increasing" replaced, ok? it suits it. :-) Halt the advance sounded significantly after ner automatic, where the signal is recorded as synonymous.
Antwort von camworks:
Peaking is a resource for focusing. Gesteilt this is the sharpest in the viewfinder. Everything correctly in the text. yes, now. previously not really. to avoid d S.da incurred any rumors, I wanted to know the clear.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Now you get only with the peaking sharp shots with the Canon, or is it synonymous with the automatic or is this too slow for this?
Antwort von GhostDog:
Ochsdradium through the powder coating on the inner flanks of the edges at Canon, the lineup is synonymous with no automatic focusing around the Faktor3.14152926 .... I hope that's enough and will be included in the website of incredibilities ....
Antwort von seniore t:
@ bruno peter to focus: on the topic:
often work with the xl2 and have so far not a problem with auto-focus: super-sharp images. synonymous with zoom out. not appreciate that canon as objective-profit suddenly worse or slower rausbringt objective ...
But more importantly:
If I manual sharpen the lead, I need a control monitor, even at sd resolution. to focus on the viewfinder manual just does not work. dv-cam that no preference and no preference which resolution (sd or hd). someone else opinion?
just my 2Center
st
Antwort von Tony Schweizer:
Progressive ripped signals are recorded as so-called segmented frames (ie, as two fields). HDCAM, this means for example, "PsF. When playing back then creates a full screen (without the time lag between the two fields).
SDI -> hard drive: 270Mb/Sec for SD and 1080i HD 960Mb/Sec at 8 bits (= 432 GB / h) - there is a stately RAID announced in a backpack together with Honda generator for power!
Price: U.S. $ 9k, 9k EU ¬, ie about 24% more expensive. Why?
Antwort von roland:
In my new XL2 can not draw the same time you can zoom and focus - which is synonymous for XLH1.
For a normal income earners with professional ambition is to lift the price falling wages, etc. can hardly be.
Antwort von Jörn:
The uncompressed output brings me to an idea: Could we use the XLH1 as high speed camera for 0.7 ~ 1.5-megapixel photos?
How could we save that much content and process later? Sufficient for a high-end PC with a hard disc RAID?
